{"id":{"repo_id":"uab","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.library.uab.edu:etd-collection-7913"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uab/oai:digitalcommons.library.uab.edu:etd-collection-7913","repository":{"repo_id":"uab","name":"University of Alabama Birmingham","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Locus of Control Differences in the Acquisition of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training and in Self-Reported Relaxation Under True and False Feedback Conditions.","abstract":"The present experiment was designed to investigate a proposed relationship between the construct of locus of control (Rotter, 1966) and the ability to learn to relax via Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training. The main purpose was to explore the notion, reviewed by Lefcourt (1972), that certain cognitive properties are associated with locus of control. The proposal was that these cognitive properties are important to learning to relax utilizing EMG feedback. Thus, one aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in learned relaxation via EMG feedback training. Another aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in the utilization of false EMG feedback as measured by self reports of experienced relaxation.","abstract_html":"The present experiment was designed to investigate a proposed relationship between the construct of locus of control (Rotter, 1966) and the ability to learn to relax via Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training. The main purpose was to explore the notion, reviewed by Lefcourt (1972), that certain cognitive properties are associated with locus of control. The proposal was that these cognitive properties are important to learning to relax utilizing EMG feedback. Thus, one aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in learned relaxation via EMG feedback training. Another aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in the utilization of false EMG feedback as measured by self reports of experienced relaxation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Siegel, David S"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1976,"date_issued":"1976-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1976-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:05:46Z","subjects":["Electromyography","Biofeedback training","Locus of control","True feedback","False feedback"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/etd-collection/6921","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Siegel, David S"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Electromyography","Biofeedback training","Locus of control","True feedback","False feedback"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/etd-collection/6921"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The present experiment was designed to investigate a proposed relationship between the construct of locus of control (Rotter, 1966) and the ability to learn to relax via Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training. The main purpose was to explore the notion, reviewed by Lefcourt (1972), that certain cognitive properties are associated with locus of control. The proposal was that these cognitive properties are important to learning to relax utilizing EMG feedback. Thus, one aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in learned relaxation via EMG feedback training. Another aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in the utilization of false EMG feedback as measured by self reports of experienced relaxation."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Locus of Control Differences in the Acquisition of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training and in Self-Reported Relaxation Under True and False Feedback Conditions."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Siegel, David S"],"dc:description.abstract":["The present experiment was designed to investigate a proposed relationship between the construct of locus of control (Rotter, 1966) and the ability to learn to relax via Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training. The main purpose was to explore the notion, reviewed by Lefcourt (1972), that certain cognitive properties are associated with locus of control. The proposal was that these cognitive properties are important to learning to relax utilizing EMG feedback. Thus, one aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in learned relaxation via EMG feedback training. Another aim was to demonstrate locus of control differences in the utilization of false EMG feedback as measured by self reports of experienced relaxation."],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/etd-collection/6921"],"dc:subject":["Electromyography","Biofeedback training","Locus of control","True feedback","False feedback"],"dc:title":["Locus of Control Differences in the Acquisition of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training and in Self-Reported Relaxation Under True and False Feedback Conditions."],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:05:46Z"}