A theory of group decision-making applied to the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis decisions

<p>This study of political decision-making stressing the process of decision-making in a group setting is, in part, a reaction against traditional approaches of political analysis.</p><p>The study of international relations is overburdened with historical studies of the interaction between states. The classic approach to the study of a given decision by one government affecting another might be called the “rational actor model”. This model treats the state as the entity reaching the decision. The decision itself is seen as behavior that reflects a rational purpose or intent. The central concepts of the model center around the calculated weighing of goals, alternatives, consequences, and choices. The “rational actor model” is the dominant method of current political analysis.</p><p>I will implicitly contend in this paper that the concept of foreign policy as a rational process of gathering information, setting alternatives, and making decisions is not an adequate tool of understanding. In fact, the “rational actor model” does not make sense out of much political phenomenon. I will directly contend in this paper that a process model of political decision-making provides an adequate and helpful tool for the understanding of political decisions.</p>

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Arts (M.A.)

Level thesis:degree_level

Thesis

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Communication

Year dc:date.available

1973

Author dc:creator

• Slade, Lester Stephen

Contributors dc:contributor

• Donald F. Duns

• Decision-making
• Cuban Missile Crisis
• 1962
• Military bases
• Soviet Cuba
• United States Foreign relations 1961-1963
• Cuba History Invasion
• 1961
• Communication
• Social and Behavioral Sciences

Licence

• http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/

Repository record dc:identifier

https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1822

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:scholarlycommons.pacific.edu:uop_etds-2821