This thesis analyzes the ideologies present the campaign rhetoric surrounding the 2008 California legislative initiative Proposition·8. Using Foss' method of ideological criticism the campaign is read prior after the opposition response to determine if an ideological shift occurs. The study is framed to identify this shift as a potential product of oppositional interaction, a characteristic of rhetoric defined by Smith and Windes.
The study concludes that the shift in ideology during the campaign by the supporters of Proposition 8 was a significant development. The response from the Proposition 8 campaign reframed the debate, making the electorate vulnerable to a different ideology. This new ideology places the state education apparatus, not the courts, in the spotlight as the state mechanism that is in dispute in the marriage controversy. When placed in .this context, theories of political economy are employed to explain how the electorate may have interpreted these arguments.
One. explanation offered is that the response ideology of the Proposition 8 campaign allowed voters to vote to outlaw gay marriages as a proactive response to a mistrust of education. The discussion section indicates that this could be an adjustment to existing ideologies, or development of an issues specific ideology that is only relevant for one issue in the mind of the individual. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of ideology as a method to analyze political rhetoric and examines the role that oppositional interaction plays in the long-term development of public dialectic.
","abstract_html":"<p>This thesis analyzes the ideologies present the campaign rhetoric surrounding the 2008 California legislative initiative Proposition·8. Using Foss' method of ideological criticism the campaign is read prior after the opposition response to determine if an ideological shift occurs. The study is framed to identify this shift as a potential product of oppositional interaction, a characteristic of rhetoric defined by Smith and Windes.</p> <p>The study concludes that the shift in ideology during the campaign by the supporters of Proposition 8 was a significant development. The response from the Proposition 8 campaign reframed the debate, making the electorate vulnerable to a different ideology. This new ideology places the state education apparatus, not the courts, in the spotlight as the state mechanism that is in dispute in the marriage controversy. When placed in .this context, theories of political economy are employed to explain how the electorate may have interpreted these arguments.</p> <p>One. explanation offered is that the response ideology of the Proposition 8 campaign allowed voters to vote to outlaw gay marriages as a proactive response to a mistrust of education. The discussion section indicates that this could be an adjustment to existing ideologies, or development of an issues specific ideology that is only relevant for one issue in the mind of the individual. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of ideology as a method to analyze political rhetoric and examines the role that oppositional interaction plays in the long-term development of public dialectic.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gardner, Kasey Christopher"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts (M.A.)","degree_level":"Thesis - Pacific Access Restricted","degree_discipline":"Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Marlin C. Bates"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2009-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:36:46Z","subjects":["California","Proposition 8 (2008)","Public opinion","Communication in politics","Political campaigns","Voting","Same-sex marriage","Political aspects","American Politics","Civil Rights and Discrimination","Communication","Critical and Cultural Studies","Family, Life Course, and Society","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Gender and Sexuality","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Law","Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies","Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Political Science","Politics and Social Change","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Sexuality and the Law","Social and Behavioral Sciences","Social Influence and Political Communication"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/718","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Marlin C. Bates"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gardner, Kasey Christopher"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-06-29T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis - Pacific Access Restricted"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["California","Proposition 8 (2008)","Public opinion","Communication in politics","Political campaigns","Voting","Same-sex marriage","Political aspects","American Politics","Civil Rights and Discrimination","Communication","Critical and Cultural Studies","Family, Life Course, and Society","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Gender and Sexuality","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Law","Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies","Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Political Science","Politics and Social Change","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Sexuality and the Law","Social and Behavioral Sciences","Social Influence and Political Communication"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/718"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis analyzes the ideologies present the campaign rhetoric surrounding the 2008 California legislative initiative Proposition·8. Using Foss' method of ideological criticism the campaign is read prior after the opposition response to determine if an ideological shift occurs. The study is framed to identify this shift as a potential product of oppositional interaction, a characteristic of rhetoric defined by Smith and Windes.
The study concludes that the shift in ideology during the campaign by the supporters of Proposition 8 was a significant development. The response from the Proposition 8 campaign reframed the debate, making the electorate vulnerable to a different ideology. This new ideology places the state education apparatus, not the courts, in the spotlight as the state mechanism that is in dispute in the marriage controversy. When placed in .this context, theories of political economy are employed to explain how the electorate may have interpreted these arguments.
One. explanation offered is that the response ideology of the Proposition 8 campaign allowed voters to vote to outlaw gay marriages as a proactive response to a mistrust of education. The discussion section indicates that this could be an adjustment to existing ideologies, or development of an issues specific ideology that is only relevant for one issue in the mind of the individual. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of ideology as a method to analyze political rhetoric and examines the role that oppositional interaction plays in the long-term development of public dialectic.
"]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["75"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Ideology in California : the role of oppositional interaction as a strategy in the campaign for Proposition 8"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Marlin C. Bates"],"dc:creator":["Gardner, Kasey Christopher"],"dc:date.available":["2018-06-29T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis analyzes the ideologies present the campaign rhetoric surrounding the 2008 California legislative initiative Proposition·8. Using Foss' method of ideological criticism the campaign is read prior after the opposition response to determine if an ideological shift occurs. The study is framed to identify this shift as a potential product of oppositional interaction, a characteristic of rhetoric defined by Smith and Windes.
The study concludes that the shift in ideology during the campaign by the supporters of Proposition 8 was a significant development. The response from the Proposition 8 campaign reframed the debate, making the electorate vulnerable to a different ideology. This new ideology places the state education apparatus, not the courts, in the spotlight as the state mechanism that is in dispute in the marriage controversy. When placed in .this context, theories of political economy are employed to explain how the electorate may have interpreted these arguments.
One. explanation offered is that the response ideology of the Proposition 8 campaign allowed voters to vote to outlaw gay marriages as a proactive response to a mistrust of education. The discussion section indicates that this could be an adjustment to existing ideologies, or development of an issues specific ideology that is only relevant for one issue in the mind of the individual. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of ideology as a method to analyze political rhetoric and examines the role that oppositional interaction plays in the long-term development of public dialectic.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/718"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:source":["75"],"dc:subject":["California","Proposition 8 (2008)","Public opinion","Communication in politics","Political campaigns","Voting","Same-sex marriage","Political aspects","American Politics","Civil Rights and Discrimination","Communication","Critical and Cultural Studies","Family, Life Course, and Society","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Gender and Sexuality","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Law","Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies","Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Political Science","Politics and Social Change","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration","Sexuality and the Law","Social and Behavioral Sciences","Social Influence and Political Communication"],"dc:title":["Ideology in California : the role of oppositional interaction as a strategy in the campaign for Proposition 8"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis - Pacific Access Restricted"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:36:46Z"}