{"id":{"repo_id":"trento","oai_identifier":"oai:iris.unitn.it:11572/472514"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/trento/oai:iris.unitn.it:11572/472514","repository":{"repo_id":"trento","name":"Università degli Studi di Trento","base_url":"https://iris.unitn.it/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Territorial Challenges and Sustainable Regional Development. A mixed-method approach","abstract":"This thesis advances a Sustainable Regional Development approach for marginalized territories by integrating quantitative diagnostics and qualitative governance analysis in central Italy (Rome, Rieti and L’Aquila). Chapter 1 assesses municipal liveability with an SDG11-aligned composite index and Benefit-of-the-Doubt aggregation; meta-frontier benchmarking and a Spatial Durbin Model separate local efficiency from structural disadvantage and reveal spatial spillovers. Chapter 2 tests whether Protected Areas reduce landscape fragmentation using a boundary-based regression discontinuity design on CORINE Land Cover (1990–2018) and the MESH metric, finding robust reductions inside parks but rapid attenuation outside borders. Chapter 3 treats Protected Areas as social–ecological systems, combining Ostrom’s framework with IUCN evaluation criteria and interviews along the Cammino Naturale dei Parchi to compare governance capacity, participation and pressures. Overall, results argue for place-based policies designed at functional territorial-system scale, coupling conservation with connectivity measures and polycentric, shared-administration arrangements that sustain liveability and compliance, guiding targeted investment and monitoring.","abstract_html":"This thesis advances a Sustainable Regional Development approach for marginalized territories by integrating quantitative diagnostics and qualitative governance analysis in central Italy (Rome, Rieti and L’Aquila). Chapter 1 assesses municipal liveability with an SDG11-aligned composite index and Benefit-of-the-Doubt aggregation; meta-frontier benchmarking and a Spatial Durbin Model separate local efficiency from structural disadvantage and reveal spatial spillovers. Chapter 2 tests whether Protected Areas reduce landscape fragmentation using a boundary-based regression discontinuity design on CORINE Land Cover (1990–2018) and the MESH metric, finding robust reductions inside parks but rapid attenuation outside borders. Chapter 3 treats Protected Areas as social–ecological systems, combining Ostrom’s framework with IUCN evaluation criteria and interviews along the Cammino Naturale dei Parchi to compare governance capacity, participation and pressures. Overall, results argue for place-based policies designed at functional territorial-system scale, coupling conservation with connectivity measures and polycentric, shared-administration arrangements that sustain liveability and compliance, guiding targeted investment and monitoring.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gaudiello, Matteo"],"institution":"Università degli studi di Trento","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sacchetti, Silvia","Buffa, Federica"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-01-29","date_published":"2026-01-29","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:04:43Z","subjects":["Settore SECS-P/02 - Politica Economica","Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia Applicata","Settore M-GGR/02 - Geografia Economico-Politica"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","10.15168/11572_472514"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dx.doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","href":"http://dx.doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","code":true},{"text":"10.15168/11572_472514","href":"https://doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/11572/472514","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Gaudiello, Matteo","Sacchetti, Silvia","Buffa, Federica"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gaudiello, Matteo"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2026-01-29"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Università degli studi di Trento","place:TRENTO"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["firstpage:1","lastpage:111","numberofpages:111"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Settore SECS-P/02 - Politica Economica","Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia Applicata","Settore M-GGR/02 - Geografia Economico-Politica"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/11572/472514","http://dx.doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","10.15168/11572_472514"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis advances a Sustainable Regional Development approach for marginalized territories by integrating quantitative diagnostics and qualitative governance analysis in central Italy (Rome, Rieti and L’Aquila). Chapter 1 assesses municipal liveability with an SDG11-aligned composite index and Benefit-of-the-Doubt aggregation; meta-frontier benchmarking and a Spatial Durbin Model separate local efficiency from structural disadvantage and reveal spatial spillovers. Chapter 2 tests whether Protected Areas reduce landscape fragmentation using a boundary-based regression discontinuity design on CORINE Land Cover (1990–2018) and the MESH metric, finding robust reductions inside parks but rapid attenuation outside borders. Chapter 3 treats Protected Areas as social–ecological systems, combining Ostrom’s framework with IUCN evaluation criteria and interviews along the Cammino Naturale dei Parchi to compare governance capacity, participation and pressures. Overall, results argue for place-based policies designed at functional territorial-system scale, coupling conservation with connectivity measures and polycentric, shared-administration arrangements that sustain liveability and compliance, guiding targeted investment and monitoring."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Territorial Challenges and Sustainable Regional Development. A mixed-method approach"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Gaudiello, Matteo","Sacchetti, Silvia","Buffa, Federica"],"dc:creator":["Gaudiello, Matteo"],"dc:date":["2026-01-29"],"dc:description":["This thesis advances a Sustainable Regional Development approach for marginalized territories by integrating quantitative diagnostics and qualitative governance analysis in central Italy (Rome, Rieti and L’Aquila). Chapter 1 assesses municipal liveability with an SDG11-aligned composite index and Benefit-of-the-Doubt aggregation; meta-frontier benchmarking and a Spatial Durbin Model separate local efficiency from structural disadvantage and reveal spatial spillovers. Chapter 2 tests whether Protected Areas reduce landscape fragmentation using a boundary-based regression discontinuity design on CORINE Land Cover (1990–2018) and the MESH metric, finding robust reductions inside parks but rapid attenuation outside borders. Chapter 3 treats Protected Areas as social–ecological systems, combining Ostrom’s framework with IUCN evaluation criteria and interviews along the Cammino Naturale dei Parchi to compare governance capacity, participation and pressures. Overall, results argue for place-based policies designed at functional territorial-system scale, coupling conservation with connectivity measures and polycentric, shared-administration arrangements that sustain liveability and compliance, guiding targeted investment and monitoring."],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/11572/472514","http://dx.doi.org/10.15168/11572_472514","10.15168/11572_472514"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Università degli studi di Trento","place:TRENTO"],"dc:relation":["firstpage:1","lastpage:111","numberofpages:111"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","license:Creative commons","license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"dc:subject":["Settore SECS-P/02 - Politica Economica","Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia Applicata","Settore M-GGR/02 - Geografia Economico-Politica"],"dc:title":["Territorial Challenges and Sustainable Regional Development. A mixed-method approach"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:04:43Z"}