Back to results

University of Toronto

Kant on Personhood

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Kant is clear that we owe duties to persons, chief among them the duty to treat persons as ends and never as mere means. But the very ability to act with respect for this duty is grounded on the prior ability to distinguish between persons and non-persons. How is this possible given Kant’s view that we are given to one another as appearances operating according to deterministic natural laws? As an idea of practical reason, it should be impossible to apply

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Philosophy
Year dc:date.issued
2024

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Hamblin, Caitlin Mary
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Stang, Nicholas

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/141044
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:utoronto.scholaris.ca:1807/141044

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Toronto
Base URL
utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Hamblin, Caitlin Mary. Kant on Personhood. 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/141044