{"id":{"repo_id":"toronto-retro","oai_identifier":"oai:utoronto.scholaris.ca:1807/125587"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/toronto-retro/oai:utoronto.scholaris.ca:1807/125587","repository":{"repo_id":"toronto-retro","name":"University of Toronto","base_url":"https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Evaluating Others’ Relevance: Dimensions, Levels, and Interdependence","abstract":"Humans seek to determine what other people are like and use others’ characteristics—such as their age, gender, and attractiveness—to assess others’ relevance to their own goals. The resulting appraisals of others’ opportunity and threat shape social judgments and behavior. My thesis accomplishes three broad aims. With Studies 1 and 2, I demonstrate that appraisals of who threatens and who facilitates one’s goals are independent dimensions of social judgment (Lassetter et al., 2021). People can be evaluated as (a) facilitating a goal, (b) threatening a goal, (c) both facilitating and threatening a goal, or (d) neither facilitating nor threatening a goal. I term this two-dimensional model the Relevance Appraisal Matrix. Relevance appraisals shift dynamically with perceiver goals: For example, a person may be appraised as facilitating a mate-seeking goal, but as neither facilitating nor threatening a self-protection goal (Lassetter et al., 2021). Further, relevance appraisals are distinct from stereotypes of group attributes and likely act as a mechanism between stereotypes of others and downstream outcomes. With Studies 3 and 4, I show that the Relevance Appraisal Matrix describes appraisals of individual targets (e.g., a nurse, a man, a close friend) and groups (e.g., medical professionals, men). Thus, in addition to appraising whether individual targets—including close and known others—pose opportunity and/or threat, relevance appraisals function as group-level phenomena that influence evaluations of broader groups. With Studies 5 and 6, I examine the link between relevance and interpersonal closeness. Close others may be especially likely to influence decisions and goal pursuit—and possibly, more likely to both facilitate and threaten goals. I show that threat and opportunity appraisals negatively and positively relate to perceived closeness, respectively. In sum, I propose a framework for understanding the structure of relevance, test how that framework applies to individual- and group-level social perception, and examine the link between relevance and closeness. Relevance appraisals are central and consequential to social perception. My thesis illuminates the structure of these appraisals and lays the foundation for future research examining how relevance shapes attention, emotions, and behavior.","abstract_html":"Humans seek to determine what other people are like and use others’ characteristics—such as their age, gender, and attractiveness—to assess others’ relevance to their own goals. The resulting appraisals of others’ opportunity and threat shape social judgments and behavior. My thesis accomplishes three broad aims. With Studies 1 and 2, I demonstrate that appraisals of who threatens and who facilitates one’s goals are independent dimensions of social judgment (Lassetter et al., 2021). People can be evaluated as (a) facilitating a goal, (b) threatening a goal, (c) both facilitating and threatening a goal, or (d) neither facilitating nor threatening a goal. I term this two-dimensional model the Relevance Appraisal Matrix. Relevance appraisals shift dynamically with perceiver goals: For example, a person may be appraised as facilitating a mate-seeking goal, but as neither facilitating nor threatening a self-protection goal (Lassetter et al., 2021). Further, relevance appraisals are distinct from stereotypes of group attributes and likely act as a mechanism between stereotypes of others and downstream outcomes. With Studies 3 and 4, I show that the Relevance Appraisal Matrix describes appraisals of individual targets (e.g., a nurse, a man, a close friend) and groups (e.g., medical professionals, men). Thus, in addition to appraising whether individual targets—including close and known others—pose opportunity and/or threat, relevance appraisals function as group-level phenomena that influence evaluations of broader groups. With Studies 5 and 6, I examine the link between relevance and interpersonal closeness. Close others may be especially likely to influence decisions and goal pursuit—and possibly, more likely to both facilitate and threaten goals. I show that threat and opportunity appraisals negatively and positively relate to perceived closeness, respectively. In sum, I propose a framework for understanding the structure of relevance, test how that framework applies to individual- and group-level social perception, and examine the link between relevance and closeness. Relevance appraisals are central and consequential to social perception. My thesis illuminates the structure of these appraisals and lays the foundation for future research examining how relevance shapes attention, emotions, and behavior.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lassetter, Bethany"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Neel, Rebecca"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-11","date_published":"2022-11","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:28:05Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1807/125587","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Neel, Rebecca"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lassetter, Bethany"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2022-11"]},{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-11-11T18:47:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-11-11T18:47:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022-11"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1807/125587"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Humans seek to determine what other people are like and use others’ characteristics—such as their age, gender, and attractiveness—to assess others’ relevance to their own goals. The resulting appraisals of others’ opportunity and threat shape social judgments and behavior. My thesis accomplishes three broad aims. With Studies 1 and 2, I demonstrate that appraisals of who threatens and who facilitates one’s goals are independent dimensions of social judgment (Lassetter et al., 2021). People can be evaluated as (a) facilitating a goal, (b) threatening a goal, (c) both facilitating and threatening a goal, or (d) neither facilitating nor threatening a goal. I term this two-dimensional model the Relevance Appraisal Matrix. Relevance appraisals shift dynamically with perceiver goals: For example, a person may be appraised as facilitating a mate-seeking goal, but as neither facilitating nor threatening a self-protection goal (Lassetter et al., 2021). Further, relevance appraisals are distinct from stereotypes of group attributes and likely act as a mechanism between stereotypes of others and downstream outcomes. With Studies 3 and 4, I show that the Relevance Appraisal Matrix describes appraisals of individual targets (e.g., a nurse, a man, a close friend) and groups (e.g., medical professionals, men). Thus, in addition to appraising whether individual targets—including close and known others—pose opportunity and/or threat, relevance appraisals function as group-level phenomena that influence evaluations of broader groups. With Studies 5 and 6, I examine the link between relevance and interpersonal closeness. Close others may be especially likely to influence decisions and goal pursuit—and possibly, more likely to both facilitate and threaten goals. I show that threat and opportunity appraisals negatively and positively relate to perceived closeness, respectively. In sum, I propose a framework for understanding the structure of relevance, test how that framework applies to individual- and group-level social perception, and examine the link between relevance and closeness. Relevance appraisals are central and consequential to social perception. My thesis illuminates the structure of these appraisals and lays the foundation for future research examining how relevance shapes attention, emotions, and behavior."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluating Others’ Relevance: Dimensions, Levels, and Interdependence"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Neel, Rebecca"],"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Lassetter, Bethany"],"dc:date":["2022-11"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-11-11T18:47:35Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-11-11T18:47:35Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2022-11"],"dc:description.abstract":["Humans seek to determine what other people are like and use others’ characteristics—such as their age, gender, and attractiveness—to assess others’ relevance to their own goals. The resulting appraisals of others’ opportunity and threat shape social judgments and behavior. My thesis accomplishes three broad aims. With Studies 1 and 2, I demonstrate that appraisals of who threatens and who facilitates one’s goals are independent dimensions of social judgment (Lassetter et al., 2021). People can be evaluated as (a) facilitating a goal, (b) threatening a goal, (c) both facilitating and threatening a goal, or (d) neither facilitating nor threatening a goal. I term this two-dimensional model the Relevance Appraisal Matrix. Relevance appraisals shift dynamically with perceiver goals: For example, a person may be appraised as facilitating a mate-seeking goal, but as neither facilitating nor threatening a self-protection goal (Lassetter et al., 2021). Further, relevance appraisals are distinct from stereotypes of group attributes and likely act as a mechanism between stereotypes of others and downstream outcomes. With Studies 3 and 4, I show that the Relevance Appraisal Matrix describes appraisals of individual targets (e.g., a nurse, a man, a close friend) and groups (e.g., medical professionals, men). Thus, in addition to appraising whether individual targets—including close and known others—pose opportunity and/or threat, relevance appraisals function as group-level phenomena that influence evaluations of broader groups. With Studies 5 and 6, I examine the link between relevance and interpersonal closeness. Close others may be especially likely to influence decisions and goal pursuit—and possibly, more likely to both facilitate and threaten goals. I show that threat and opportunity appraisals negatively and positively relate to perceived closeness, respectively. In sum, I propose a framework for understanding the structure of relevance, test how that framework applies to individual- and group-level social perception, and examine the link between relevance and closeness. Relevance appraisals are central and consequential to social perception. My thesis illuminates the structure of these appraisals and lays the foundation for future research examining how relevance shapes attention, emotions, and behavior."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1807/125587"],"dc:title":["Evaluating Others’ Relevance: Dimensions, Levels, and Interdependence"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:28:05Z"}