Back to results

University of Toronto

Standardizing Injustice in Transition-related Medicine?: An Institutional Ethnography of How Assessment Protocols Coordinate Inequitable Access to Hormones and Surgeries in Canada

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Transgender (trans) people experience barriers to transition medicine such as cross-sex hormones and sex reassignment surgeries. In response, standardized care protocols, such as the World Professional Association of Transgender Health standards of care (WPATH-SOC), are recommended to improve gaps in care. To better understand how standardized care protocols shape access to transition medicine in Canada, I draw on institutional ethnography as a critical research strategy. In this dissertation I thus explicate how the main protocols used to assess trans people’s psychosocial readiness for hormones or surgeries serve a powerful coordinating function. Although significant advocacy targets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders for pathologizing trans identity through the gender dysphoria diagnosis, my research demonstrates that the WPATH-SOC standardizes an entire model of care based in pathologization. This research project uses data obtained through talking with twenty-two trans people, clinicians, clinician-educators, and hospital administrators, observing clinician-education workshops, and analyzing pertinent assessment protocols and healthcare policy texts. My dissertation makes three substantive contributions to the areas of public health, trans studies, and health professions education research. First, I show that standardized readiness assessments previously understood as innocuous instead contribute to inequities and further pathologize trans people. Second, I argue that in the absence of trans health in the formal health professions education curricula, standardized assessment protocols serve as a form of curriculum, coordinating how health professionals learn and teach this clinical sub-specialty. Third, the results of this research hold the potential to bolster trans health advocacy efforts by identifying how assessment protocols rule health professionals’ and trans people’s resistance practices. In the spirit of activist institutional ethnography this dissertation concludes with a discussion on recommended future advocacy and systems change in the areas of policy, education, and practice.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Dalla Lana School of Public Health
Year dc:date.issued
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • MacKinnon, Kinnon Ross
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Ross, Lori E

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/102765
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:utoronto.scholaris.ca:1807/102765

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Toronto
Base URL
utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

MacKinnon, Kinnon Ross. Standardizing Injustice in Transition-related Medicine?: An Institutional Ethnography of How Assessment Protocols Coordinate Inequitable Access to Hormones and Surgeries in Canada. 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/102765