{"id":{"repo_id":"texas","oai_identifier":"oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/33516"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/texas/oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/33516","repository":{"repo_id":"texas","name":"University of Texas","base_url":"https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Exploration of short and long term memory in adults who do and do not stutter","abstract":"The purpose of the present study is to look at short-term and long-term memory differences between persons who do and do not stutter. Adults who do and do not stutter listened to lists of 12 phonologically related, 12 semantically related, and 12 neutral words. Both groups will be required to recall these words immediately and after a 20-minute time delay where participants were presented with interference tasks. It was hypothesized that persons who stutter would demonstrate lower recall than adults who do not stutter on the immediate recall of phonological lists but that no such differences would be observed for the semantic or control lists. Further, that after multiple exposures to these word lists the initial immediate recall differences will dissipate. Taken together, these predictions would lend further support to the notion that phonological working memory is initially more taxing for AWS. No significant differences were seen on short-term or long-term accuracy rates between speaker groups for the phonological, semantic, or control list conditions. AWS saw a significantly higher rate of increase on performance from first to last short-term trials on phonological condition than AWNS counterpart. This difference was not seen for semantic or control conditions.","abstract_html":"The purpose of the present study is to look at short-term and long-term memory differences between persons who do and do not stutter. Adults who do and do not stutter listened to lists of 12 phonologically related, 12 semantically related, and 12 neutral words. Both groups will be required to recall these words immediately and after a 20-minute time delay where participants were presented with interference tasks. It was hypothesized that persons who stutter would demonstrate lower recall than adults who do not stutter on the immediate recall of phonological lists but that no such differences would be observed for the semantic or control lists. Further, that after multiple exposures to these word lists the initial immediate recall differences will dissipate. Taken together, these predictions would lend further support to the notion that phonological working memory is initially more taxing for AWS. No significant differences were seen on short-term or long-term accuracy rates between speaker groups for the phonological, semantic, or control list conditions. AWS saw a significantly higher rate of increase on performance from first to last short-term trials on phonological condition than AWNS counterpart. This difference was not seen for semantic or control conditions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Utianski, Danielle Blair"],"institution":"The University of Texas at Austin","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Speech-Language Pathology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Byrd, Courtney T."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Hampton, Elizabeth H"],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-05","date_published":"2015-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:01:20Z","subjects":["Long-term memory","Short-term memory","Stuttering"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["doi:10.15781/T2WD89"],"render_values":[{"text":"doi:10.15781/T2WD89","href":"https://doi.org/10.15781/T2WD89","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2152/33516","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Byrd, Courtney T."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Hampton, Elizabeth H"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Utianski, Danielle Blair"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-03-03T19:27:32Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-03-03T19:27:32Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech-Language Pathology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The University of Texas at Austin"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Long-term memory","Short-term memory","Stuttering"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["doi:10.15781/T2WD89"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2152/33516"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of the present study is to look at short-term and long-term memory differences between persons who do and do not stutter. Adults who do and do not stutter listened to lists of 12 phonologically related, 12 semantically related, and 12 neutral words. Both groups will be required to recall these words immediately and after a 20-minute time delay where participants were presented with interference tasks. It was hypothesized that persons who stutter would demonstrate lower recall than adults who do not stutter on the immediate recall of phonological lists but that no such differences would be observed for the semantic or control lists. Further, that after multiple exposures to these word lists the initial immediate recall differences will dissipate. Taken together, these predictions would lend further support to the notion that phonological working memory is initially more taxing for AWS. No significant differences were seen on short-term or long-term accuracy rates between speaker groups for the phonological, semantic, or control list conditions. AWS saw a significantly higher rate of increase on performance from first to last short-term trials on phonological condition than AWNS counterpart. This difference was not seen for semantic or control conditions."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Exploration of short and long term memory in adults who do and do not stutter"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Byrd, Courtney T."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Hampton, Elizabeth H"],"dc:creator":["Utianski, Danielle Blair"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-03-03T19:27:32Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-03-03T19:27:32Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of the present study is to look at short-term and long-term memory differences between persons who do and do not stutter. Adults who do and do not stutter listened to lists of 12 phonologically related, 12 semantically related, and 12 neutral words. Both groups will be required to recall these words immediately and after a 20-minute time delay where participants were presented with interference tasks. It was hypothesized that persons who stutter would demonstrate lower recall than adults who do not stutter on the immediate recall of phonological lists but that no such differences would be observed for the semantic or control lists. Further, that after multiple exposures to these word lists the initial immediate recall differences will dissipate. Taken together, these predictions would lend further support to the notion that phonological working memory is initially more taxing for AWS. No significant differences were seen on short-term or long-term accuracy rates between speaker groups for the phonological, semantic, or control list conditions. AWS saw a significantly higher rate of increase on performance from first to last short-term trials on phonological condition than AWNS counterpart. This difference was not seen for semantic or control conditions."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["doi:10.15781/T2WD89"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/2152/33516"],"dc:subject":["Long-term memory","Short-term memory","Stuttering"],"dc:title":["Exploration of short and long term memory in adults who do and do not stutter"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech-Language Pathology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["The University of Texas at Austin"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:01:20Z"}