{"id":{"repo_id":"texas","oai_identifier":"oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/126058"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/texas/oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/126058","repository":{"repo_id":"texas","name":"University of Texas","base_url":"https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Improved integration of information to reduce subsurface model bias","abstract":"Subsurface modeling deals with data-related issues like cognitive and sampling biases, and model-related challenges including statistical assumptions, misspecification, and algorithmic biases. These challenges introduce four critical implications during subsurface modeling. Firstly, subsurface sampling is subject to sampling bias, which compromises statistical representativeness. Secondly, analog selection methodologies rely on multivariate statistics and expert judgment that overlook spatial information and data dimensionality. Thirdly, subsurface inferential workflows that utilize dimensionality reduction seldom provide repeatable frameworks that maintain model stability and are invariant to Euclidean transformations. Lastly, deep learning methods for dimensionality reduction, characterized as black-box models, lack interpretability and robust evaluation metrics, increasing susceptibility to algorithmic bias. Consequently, neglecting these challenges in subsurface modeling could lead to erroneous predictions, inconsistent inferences, diminished model reliability, and suboptimal decision-making that impacts project economics. This dissertation integrates information within subsurface models to reduce model bias and significantly improve their accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. First, I create spatial declustering methods to debias spatial datasets with single and multiscale preferential sampling in stationary populations. Second, I introduce a novel geostatistics-based machine learning method for identifying subsurface resource analogs that integrate spatial information in subsurface datasets with high dimensionality. Next, I efficiently combine machine learning and computational geometry methods to stabilize lower dimensional spaces for uncertainty quantification and interpretation. Finally, I create a methodology to assess, evaluate, and interpret the stability of deep learning latent feature spaces. These novel methodologies demonstrate the importance of improved techniques for information integration in subsurface modeling and show better results over naïve methods. This results in objective sampling debiasing in spatial stationary populations with single or multiple data scales, improving statistical representativity. Also, the results show better generalization and accurate identification of spatial analogs in high-dimensional datasets. Moreover, the methods yield Euclidean transformation-invariant lower-dimensional spaces, ensuring unique and repeatable solutions that improve model reliability and interpretability, for rational comparisons. Finally, the results indicate that deep learning models for dimensionality reduction exhibit algorithmic biases and instabilities, including sample, structural, and inferential instability, affecting their reliability and interpretability. Together, these innovations ultimately reduce model bias and significantly improve subsurface modeling.","abstract_html":"Subsurface modeling deals with data-related issues like cognitive and sampling biases, and model-related challenges including statistical assumptions, misspecification, and algorithmic biases. These challenges introduce four critical implications during subsurface modeling. Firstly, subsurface sampling is subject to sampling bias, which compromises statistical representativeness. Secondly, analog selection methodologies rely on multivariate statistics and expert judgment that overlook spatial information and data dimensionality. Thirdly, subsurface inferential workflows that utilize dimensionality reduction seldom provide repeatable frameworks that maintain model stability and are invariant to Euclidean transformations. Lastly, deep learning methods for dimensionality reduction, characterized as black-box models, lack interpretability and robust evaluation metrics, increasing susceptibility to algorithmic bias. Consequently, neglecting these challenges in subsurface modeling could lead to erroneous predictions, inconsistent inferences, diminished model reliability, and suboptimal decision-making that impacts project economics. This dissertation integrates information within subsurface models to reduce model bias and significantly improve their accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. First, I create spatial declustering methods to debias spatial datasets with single and multiscale preferential sampling in stationary populations. Second, I introduce a novel geostatistics-based machine learning method for identifying subsurface resource analogs that integrate spatial information in subsurface datasets with high dimensionality. Next, I efficiently combine machine learning and computational geometry methods to stabilize lower dimensional spaces for uncertainty quantification and interpretation. Finally, I create a methodology to assess, evaluate, and interpret the stability of deep learning latent feature spaces. These novel methodologies demonstrate the importance of improved techniques for information integration in subsurface modeling and show better results over naïve methods. This results in objective sampling debiasing in spatial stationary populations with single or multiple data scales, improving statistical representativity. Also, the results show better generalization and accurate identification of spatial analogs in high-dimensional datasets. Moreover, the methods yield Euclidean transformation-invariant lower-dimensional spaces, ensuring unique and repeatable solutions that improve model reliability and interpretability, for rational comparisons. Finally, the results indicate that deep learning models for dimensionality reduction exhibit algorithmic biases and instabilities, including sample, structural, and inferential instability, affecting their reliability and interpretability. Together, these innovations ultimately reduce model bias and significantly improve subsurface modeling.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mabadeje, Ademide O."],"institution":"The University of Texas at Austin","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Petroleum Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pyrcz, Michael"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Lake, Larry W.","Prodanović , Maša","Foster, John T.","Jo, Honggeun"],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-05","date_published":"2024-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:00:58Z","subjects":["Algorithmic biases","Latent spaces","Deep learning","Model interpretability","Model stability","Latent space evaluation","Model reliability","Geostatistics","Subsurface modeling","Sampling bias","Information integration","Bias mitigation","Machine learning","Dimensionality reduction","Petroleum engineering"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/52597"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/52597","href":"https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/52597","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2152/126058","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pyrcz, Michael"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Lake, Larry W.","Prodanović , Maša","Foster, John T.","Jo, Honggeun"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mabadeje, Ademide O."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-07-17T00:43:51Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-07-17T00:43:51Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Petroleum Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The University of Texas at Austin"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Algorithmic biases","Latent spaces","Deep learning","Model interpretability","Model stability","Latent space evaluation","Model reliability","Geostatistics","Subsurface modeling","Sampling bias","Information integration","Bias mitigation","Machine learning","Dimensionality reduction","Petroleum engineering"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2152/126058","https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/52597"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Subsurface modeling deals with data-related issues like cognitive and sampling biases, and model-related challenges including statistical assumptions, misspecification, and algorithmic biases. These challenges introduce four critical implications during subsurface modeling. Firstly, subsurface sampling is subject to sampling bias, which compromises statistical representativeness. Secondly, analog selection methodologies rely on multivariate statistics and expert judgment that overlook spatial information and data dimensionality. Thirdly, subsurface inferential workflows that utilize dimensionality reduction seldom provide repeatable frameworks that maintain model stability and are invariant to Euclidean transformations. Lastly, deep learning methods for dimensionality reduction, characterized as black-box models, lack interpretability and robust evaluation metrics, increasing susceptibility to algorithmic bias. Consequently, neglecting these challenges in subsurface modeling could lead to erroneous predictions, inconsistent inferences, diminished model reliability, and suboptimal decision-making that impacts project economics. This dissertation integrates information within subsurface models to reduce model bias and significantly improve their accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. First, I create spatial declustering methods to debias spatial datasets with single and multiscale preferential sampling in stationary populations. Second, I introduce a novel geostatistics-based machine learning method for identifying subsurface resource analogs that integrate spatial information in subsurface datasets with high dimensionality. Next, I efficiently combine machine learning and computational geometry methods to stabilize lower dimensional spaces for uncertainty quantification and interpretation. Finally, I create a methodology to assess, evaluate, and interpret the stability of deep learning latent feature spaces. These novel methodologies demonstrate the importance of improved techniques for information integration in subsurface modeling and show better results over naïve methods. This results in objective sampling debiasing in spatial stationary populations with single or multiple data scales, improving statistical representativity. Also, the results show better generalization and accurate identification of spatial analogs in high-dimensional datasets. Moreover, the methods yield Euclidean transformation-invariant lower-dimensional spaces, ensuring unique and repeatable solutions that improve model reliability and interpretability, for rational comparisons. Finally, the results indicate that deep learning models for dimensionality reduction exhibit algorithmic biases and instabilities, including sample, structural, and inferential instability, affecting their reliability and interpretability. Together, these innovations ultimately reduce model bias and significantly improve subsurface modeling."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Improved integration of information to reduce subsurface model bias"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pyrcz, Michael"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Lake, Larry W.","Prodanović , Maša","Foster, John T.","Jo, Honggeun"],"dc:creator":["Mabadeje, Ademide O."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-07-17T00:43:51Z"],"dc:date.available":["2024-07-17T00:43:51Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["Subsurface modeling deals with data-related issues like cognitive and sampling biases, and model-related challenges including statistical assumptions, misspecification, and algorithmic biases. These challenges introduce four critical implications during subsurface modeling. Firstly, subsurface sampling is subject to sampling bias, which compromises statistical representativeness. Secondly, analog selection methodologies rely on multivariate statistics and expert judgment that overlook spatial information and data dimensionality. Thirdly, subsurface inferential workflows that utilize dimensionality reduction seldom provide repeatable frameworks that maintain model stability and are invariant to Euclidean transformations. Lastly, deep learning methods for dimensionality reduction, characterized as black-box models, lack interpretability and robust evaluation metrics, increasing susceptibility to algorithmic bias. Consequently, neglecting these challenges in subsurface modeling could lead to erroneous predictions, inconsistent inferences, diminished model reliability, and suboptimal decision-making that impacts project economics. This dissertation integrates information within subsurface models to reduce model bias and significantly improve their accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. First, I create spatial declustering methods to debias spatial datasets with single and multiscale preferential sampling in stationary populations. Second, I introduce a novel geostatistics-based machine learning method for identifying subsurface resource analogs that integrate spatial information in subsurface datasets with high dimensionality. Next, I efficiently combine machine learning and computational geometry methods to stabilize lower dimensional spaces for uncertainty quantification and interpretation. Finally, I create a methodology to assess, evaluate, and interpret the stability of deep learning latent feature spaces. These novel methodologies demonstrate the importance of improved techniques for information integration in subsurface modeling and show better results over naïve methods. This results in objective sampling debiasing in spatial stationary populations with single or multiple data scales, improving statistical representativity. Also, the results show better generalization and accurate identification of spatial analogs in high-dimensional datasets. Moreover, the methods yield Euclidean transformation-invariant lower-dimensional spaces, ensuring unique and repeatable solutions that improve model reliability and interpretability, for rational comparisons. Finally, the results indicate that deep learning models for dimensionality reduction exhibit algorithmic biases and instabilities, including sample, structural, and inferential instability, affecting their reliability and interpretability. Together, these innovations ultimately reduce model bias and significantly improve subsurface modeling."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2152/126058","https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/52597"],"dc:subject":["Algorithmic biases","Latent spaces","Deep learning","Model interpretability","Model stability","Latent space evaluation","Model reliability","Geostatistics","Subsurface modeling","Sampling bias","Information integration","Bias mitigation","Machine learning","Dimensionality reduction","Petroleum engineering"],"dc:title":["Improved integration of information to reduce subsurface model bias"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Petroleum Engineering"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The University of Texas at Austin"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:00:58Z"}