{"id":{"repo_id":"texas","oai_identifier":"oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/12550"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/texas/oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/12550","repository":{"repo_id":"texas","name":"University of Texas","base_url":"https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The theoria and praxis of obligations to future generations","abstract":"Public policy decisions made by the present generation may have a profound impact on future generations. That possibility calls into question the nature and extent to which the present generation has obligations to future generations. The dissertation starts with the notion of whether there is an obligation to have future generations. It then discusses the various theories and principles that have been put forward regarding obligations to future generations. Theories and principles are divided into major types, identifying the features of each type. Each type is then critiqued, identifying the major problems with each. Arguments against obligations to future generations are also examined. A partial solution to the problem of obligations is then proposed in the form of a Theory Y. Theory Y is discussed in the context of whether it can meet the objections raised against previous theories of obligations to future generations. The nature of Theory Y and its implications for public policy are discussed. The dissertation ends with a discussion of how obligations to future generations might be accomplished within the context of a democratic society.","abstract_html":"Public policy decisions made by the present generation may have a profound impact on future generations. That possibility calls into question the nature and extent to which the present generation has obligations to future generations. The dissertation starts with the notion of whether there is an obligation to have future generations. It then discusses the various theories and principles that have been put forward regarding obligations to future generations. Theories and principles are divided into major types, identifying the features of each type. Each type is then critiqued, identifying the major problems with each. Arguments against obligations to future generations are also examined. A partial solution to the problem of obligations is then proposed in the form of a Theory Y. Theory Y is discussed in the context of whether it can meet the objections raised against previous theories of obligations to future generations. The nature of Theory Y and its implications for public policy are discussed. The dissertation ends with a discussion of how obligations to future generations might be accomplished within the context of a democratic society.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Peebles, Rex Charles"],"institution":"The University of Texas at Austin","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Government","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Seung, T. K.","Fishkin, James S."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2003,"date_issued":"2003-12","date_published":"2003-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:01:18Z","subjects":["Social ethics","Ethics","Environmental ethics"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries&apos; web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2152/12550","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Seung, T. K.","Fishkin, James S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Peebles, Rex Charles"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-07-26T14:45:46Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-07-26T14:45:46Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2003-12"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Government"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The University of Texas at Austin"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Social ethics","Ethics","Environmental ethics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries&apos; web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2152/12550"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Public policy decisions made by the present generation may have a profound impact on future generations. That possibility calls into question the nature and extent to which the present generation has obligations to future generations. The dissertation starts with the notion of whether there is an obligation to have future generations. It then discusses the various theories and principles that have been put forward regarding obligations to future generations. Theories and principles are divided into major types, identifying the features of each type. Each type is then critiqued, identifying the major problems with each. Arguments against obligations to future generations are also examined. A partial solution to the problem of obligations is then proposed in the form of a Theory Y. Theory Y is discussed in the context of whether it can meet the objections raised against previous theories of obligations to future generations. The nature of Theory Y and its implications for public policy are discussed. The dissertation ends with a discussion of how obligations to future generations might be accomplished within the context of a democratic society."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["electronic"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The theoria and praxis of obligations to future generations"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Seung, T. K.","Fishkin, James S."],"dc:creator":["Peebles, Rex Charles"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-07-26T14:45:46Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-07-26T14:45:46Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2003-12"],"dc:description":["text"],"dc:description.abstract":["Public policy decisions made by the present generation may have a profound impact on future generations. That possibility calls into question the nature and extent to which the present generation has obligations to future generations. The dissertation starts with the notion of whether there is an obligation to have future generations. It then discusses the various theories and principles that have been put forward regarding obligations to future generations. Theories and principles are divided into major types, identifying the features of each type. Each type is then critiqued, identifying the major problems with each. Arguments against obligations to future generations are also examined. A partial solution to the problem of obligations is then proposed in the form of a Theory Y. Theory Y is discussed in the context of whether it can meet the objections raised against previous theories of obligations to future generations. The nature of Theory Y and its implications for public policy are discussed. The dissertation ends with a discussion of how obligations to future generations might be accomplished within the context of a democratic society."],"dc:format.medium":["electronic"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/2152/12550"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries&apos; web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works."],"dc:subject":["Social ethics","Ethics","Environmental ethics"],"dc:title":["The theoria and praxis of obligations to future generations"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Government"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The University of Texas at Austin"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:01:18Z"}