Back to results

Texas State University

Case Study Research Public Health Grants: Exploring Grant Criteria Within Public and Private Foundations in Austin, Texas

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This applied research project looked at the grant criteria commonly used to make funding decisions within public and private foundations in Austin, Texas. Eight executive directors, program officers, and/or board trustees from eight community health foundations were interviewed. The goal was to extract information about the requirements, qualities, and characteristics each foundation considered the most rewarding for a non-profit organization requesting funding. Some of the foundations interviewed funded multiple initiatives, with public health being the common thread amongst them all. Interviews were conducted from September 8 to September 29, 2006. Document and archival data analysis and structured interviews with foundation officers provided evidence that either supported or refuted the five working hypotheses developed to determine the most desirable grant criteria within public health foundations. The findings were in favor of each set of working hypotheses. Most of the public health foundations were created with a set of focus areas in mind to fund non-profit public health initiatives in the same field of expertise (WH1 : FOCUS AREAS). Most of the foundations exist to fund unmet social needs and often give preference to grant applicants who are able to communicate the scope of the unmet need in the community (WH2 : SOCIAL NEED). The majority of the public health foundations want to have a significant impact on improving the health of Central Texans (the Austin area) and prefer grant applicants to provide proof of impact if funding needs are met (WH3 : IMPACT). The majority of the public health foundations looked highly upon sustainability within the organization and required grant applicants to provide proof of outside funding and collaborative efforts (WH4 : SUSTAINABILITY). Finally, an overwhelming number of public health foundations required grant applicants to exhibit sound financial practices and appropriate financial documents to prove the organization's financial accountability (WH5 : FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY).

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Masters in Public Administration
Level thesis:degree_level
Masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Public Administration
Grantor
Texas State University
Year dc:date.issued
2006

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Prentice, Tina Forward
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Shields, Patricia M.
Committee member dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Saldana, Tamela

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10877/3590
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digital.library.txst.edu:10877/3590

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Texas State University
Base URL
digital.library.txst.edu/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Prentice, Tina Forward. Case Study Research Public Health Grants: Exploring Grant Criteria Within Public and Private Foundations in Austin, Texas. Masters thesis, Texas State University, 2006. https://hdl.handle.net/10877/3590