{"id":{"repo_id":"texas-state","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.library.txst.edu:10877/24711"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/texas-state/oai:digital.library.txst.edu:10877/24711","repository":{"repo_id":"texas-state","name":"Texas State University","base_url":"https://digital.library.txst.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Fraternity Re-Founded: A 'Pedagogues'","abstract":"This thesis analyzes the rhetoric of fraternity through an observational participant-observer study of founding the Lambda Phi chapter of Lambda Chi Alpha at Texas State University. It examines how fraternity operates as a communicative system shaped through recruitment, ritual, governance, and everyday interaction around men from diverse backgrounds. Tracing the chapter’s development from inception to institutional structure, the study identifies how dominant scripts of fraternity masculinity—emotional restraint, hierarchy, competitiveness, and performative toughness—were introduced, challenged, and revised through conflict and deliberation. Using narrative inquiry and rhetorical analysis, it argues that fraternity identity is now inherited but constructed through communicative choices that either reproduce or disrupt traditional stereotypes. The founding process reveals how men collectively negotiate and institutionalize models of manhood within higher education and amongst themselves.","abstract_html":"This thesis analyzes the rhetoric of fraternity through an observational participant-observer study of founding the Lambda Phi chapter of Lambda Chi Alpha at Texas State University. It examines how fraternity operates as a communicative system shaped through recruitment, ritual, governance, and everyday interaction around men from diverse backgrounds. Tracing the chapter’s development from inception to institutional structure, the study identifies how dominant scripts of fraternity masculinity—emotional restraint, hierarchy, competitiveness, and performative toughness—were introduced, challenged, and revised through conflict and deliberation. Using narrative inquiry and rhetorical analysis, it argues that fraternity identity is now inherited but constructed through communicative choices that either reproduce or disrupt traditional stereotypes. The founding process reveals how men collectively negotiate and institutionalize models of manhood within higher education and amongst themselves.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dao, Johnny Nguyen"],"institution":"Texas State University","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Technical Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Dayley, Christopher"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Ponce, Timothy","Poston, Bill","Dudolski, Bob"],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-05","date_published":"2026-05","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:22:53Z","subjects":["fraternity","brotherhood","belonging","identity formation","masculinity"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10877/24711","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Dayley, Christopher"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Ponce, Timothy","Poston, Bill","Dudolski, Bob"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dao, Johnny Nguyen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-05-06T15:09:34Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2026-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Technical Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Texas State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["fraternity","brotherhood","belonging","identity formation","masculinity"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10877/24711"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis analyzes the rhetoric of fraternity through an observational participant-observer study of founding the Lambda Phi chapter of Lambda Chi Alpha at Texas State University. It examines how fraternity operates as a communicative system shaped through recruitment, ritual, governance, and everyday interaction around men from diverse backgrounds. Tracing the chapter’s development from inception to institutional structure, the study identifies how dominant scripts of fraternity masculinity—emotional restraint, hierarchy, competitiveness, and performative toughness—were introduced, challenged, and revised through conflict and deliberation. Using narrative inquiry and rhetorical analysis, it argues that fraternity identity is now inherited but constructed through communicative choices that either reproduce or disrupt traditional stereotypes. The founding process reveals how men collectively negotiate and institutionalize models of manhood within higher education and amongst themselves."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["1 file (.pdf)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Fraternity Re-Founded: A 'Pedagogues'"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Dayley, Christopher"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Ponce, Timothy","Poston, Bill","Dudolski, Bob"],"dc:creator":["Dao, Johnny Nguyen"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-05-06T15:09:34Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2026-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis analyzes the rhetoric of fraternity through an observational participant-observer study of founding the Lambda Phi chapter of Lambda Chi Alpha at Texas State University. It examines how fraternity operates as a communicative system shaped through recruitment, ritual, governance, and everyday interaction around men from diverse backgrounds. Tracing the chapter’s development from inception to institutional structure, the study identifies how dominant scripts of fraternity masculinity—emotional restraint, hierarchy, competitiveness, and performative toughness—were introduced, challenged, and revised through conflict and deliberation. Using narrative inquiry and rhetorical analysis, it argues that fraternity identity is now inherited but constructed through communicative choices that either reproduce or disrupt traditional stereotypes. The founding process reveals how men collectively negotiate and institutionalize models of manhood within higher education and amongst themselves."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:format.medium":["1 file (.pdf)"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10877/24711"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:subject":["fraternity","brotherhood","belonging","identity formation","masculinity"],"dc:title":["Fraternity Re-Founded: A 'Pedagogues'"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Technical Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["Texas State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:22:53Z"}