{"id":{"repo_id":"texas-state","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.library.txst.edu:10877/11831"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/texas-state/oai:digital.library.txst.edu:10877/11831","repository":{"repo_id":"texas-state","name":"Texas State University","base_url":"https://digital.library.txst.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Closed Borders: A Comparative Analysis Between the Immigration Detention Policies of the United States and Australia","abstract":"The United States and Australia are often regarded as being tough on immigration though the immigration concerns of the two countries are vastly different. This paper compares the mandatory detention policies in these two countries in terms of their motivation and authorization, immigration target, and facilities used to detain migrants. This comparison ensures the immigration policies most appropriately address the needs of their country. The results revealed many similarities between the United States and Australia’s mandatory detention policies. These results raise concerns about current deterrence-motivated immigration practices in the United States and Australia and can be used to influence public opinion as well as provide support for sensible immigration reform.","abstract_html":"The United States and Australia are often regarded as being tough on immigration though the immigration concerns of the two countries are vastly different. This paper compares the mandatory detention policies in these two countries in terms of their motivation and authorization, immigration target, and facilities used to detain migrants. This comparison ensures the immigration policies most appropriately address the needs of their country. The results revealed many similarities between the United States and Australia’s mandatory detention policies. These results raise concerns about current deterrence-motivated immigration practices in the United States and Australia and can be used to influence public opinion as well as provide support for sensible immigration reform.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gold, Caitlin"],"institution":"Texas State University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Criminal Justice","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Arnio, Ashley N."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-05","date_published":"2019-05","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:22:32Z","subjects":["asylum","United States","Australia","comparison","immigration policies","immigration"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10877/11831","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Arnio, Ashley N."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gold, Caitlin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-06-16T19:01:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-06-16T19:01:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Criminal Justice"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Texas State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["asylum","United States","Australia","comparison","immigration policies","immigration"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10877/11831"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The United States and Australia are often regarded as being tough on immigration though the immigration concerns of the two countries are vastly different. This paper compares the mandatory detention policies in these two countries in terms of their motivation and authorization, immigration target, and facilities used to detain migrants. This comparison ensures the immigration policies most appropriately address the needs of their country. The results revealed many similarities between the United States and Australia’s mandatory detention policies. These results raise concerns about current deterrence-motivated immigration practices in the United States and Australia and can be used to influence public opinion as well as provide support for sensible immigration reform."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["1 file (.pdf)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Closed Borders: A Comparative Analysis Between the Immigration Detention Policies of the United States and Australia"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Arnio, Ashley N."],"dc:creator":["Gold, Caitlin"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-06-16T19:01:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-06-16T19:01:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["The United States and Australia are often regarded as being tough on immigration though the immigration concerns of the two countries are vastly different. This paper compares the mandatory detention policies in these two countries in terms of their motivation and authorization, immigration target, and facilities used to detain migrants. This comparison ensures the immigration policies most appropriately address the needs of their country. The results revealed many similarities between the United States and Australia’s mandatory detention policies. These results raise concerns about current deterrence-motivated immigration practices in the United States and Australia and can be used to influence public opinion as well as provide support for sensible immigration reform."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:format.medium":["1 file (.pdf)"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10877/11831"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:subject":["asylum","United States","Australia","comparison","immigration policies","immigration"],"dc:title":["Closed Borders: A Comparative Analysis Between the Immigration Detention Policies of the United States and Australia"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Criminal Justice"],"thesis:institution_name":["Texas State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:22:32Z"}