Back to results

Temple University. Libraries

Fail Better: The Aesthetics of Contemporary Criticism

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Though literature and literary study have needed defense for most of their respective histories, the current crisis in academic literary study and the humanities more generally has forced scholars into the uncomfortable position of selling their disciplines and simultaneously warning students about the risks involved in earning what the dominant public considers to be "useless" degrees. The paradox, of course, is that dissuading would-be studiers is both ethical and destructive: it is necessary to inform students of the frightful instability of careers in literary study, but doing so renders such careers even more unstable. While some argue that the decline of the discipline is a result of practices within the discipline, I suggest that the root of the problem lies in the dominant discourse, which forces scholars to defend the discipline according to dominant notions of success. Using Frank Lentricchia's "Last Will and Testament of an Ex-Literary Critic" as a hinge between discussions of the value of literary study and elaborations of the antisocial thesis in queer theory, I contend that the discipline is not socially valued for the same reason it is socially valuable: it facilitates the pleasure of experiencing and envisioning new possibilities in and through the circulation of discourse. Since this aim does not (easily) translate into wealth accumulation or employability, it does not read as "success" and therefore the discipline has difficulty being socially valued. Rather than explaining the various benefits of earning a degree in literature, I argue that the discipline should embrace (its) failure as both a challenge to and re-imagining of dominant notions of success.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
Temple University. Libraries
Year dc:date.issued
2014

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Schmid, Erica
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • O'Hara, Daniel T., 1948-
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Singer, Alan, 1948-
  • Levitt, Laura, 1960-
  • Alpert, Rebecca T. (Rebecca Trachtenberg), 1950-

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
890207778
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/3534

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Temple University
Base URL
scholarshare.temple.edu/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Schmid, Erica. Fail Better: The Aesthetics of Contemporary Criticism. Temple University. Libraries, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/3534