{"id":{"repo_id":"temple","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/2982"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/temple/oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/2982","repository":{"repo_id":"temple","name":"Temple University","base_url":"https://scholarshare.temple.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: AN EXAMINATION OF STUDENT OUTCOMES BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTATION","abstract":"The current research study examined one district's journey through Response to Intervention (RtI) implementation. RtI is a program, now written into federal legislation (IDEIA, 2004; NCLB, 2002), that allows school districts to intervene with additional research-based education resources for struggling students. Districts are able to do this as a means of intervention prior to referral to special education in addition to identifying a student as eligible for special education services. The literature guiding districts through the RtI implementation process describes the components of RtI (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2006; Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007) but lacks empirical research to establish the effectiveness of RtI in terms of student achievement. This dissertation seeks to add to the current literature by examining student outcomes before and after implementation of an RtI framework, analyzing the use of assessments to determine student placement into intervention services, and noting the perceptions of teachers during implementation. The results of this study will assist school districts by presenting student data trends that occurred before and after implementation, which may affect district practices and policy. In addition, implications for future research are discussed.","abstract_html":"The current research study examined one district&#x27;s journey through Response to Intervention (RtI) implementation. RtI is a program, now written into federal legislation (IDEIA, 2004; NCLB, 2002), that allows school districts to intervene with additional research-based education resources for struggling students. Districts are able to do this as a means of intervention prior to referral to special education in addition to identifying a student as eligible for special education services. The literature guiding districts through the RtI implementation process describes the components of RtI (Fuchs &amp; Fuchs, 2006; Fuchs &amp; Fuchs, 2007) but lacks empirical research to establish the effectiveness of RtI in terms of student achievement. This dissertation seeks to add to the current literature by examining student outcomes before and after implementation of an RtI framework, analyzing the use of assessments to determine student placement into intervention services, and noting the perceptions of teachers during implementation. The results of this study will assist school districts by presenting student data trends that occurred before and after implementation, which may affect district practices and policy. In addition, implications for future research are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hart, Jonathan"],"institution":"Temple University. Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Booth, Julie L."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["DuCette, Joseph P.","Pendergast, Laura L.","Schifter, Catherine","Thurman, S. Kenneth"],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015","date_published":"2015","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:19:39Z","subjects":["Educational psychology","Educational tests and measurements","Education, Special","Aimsweb","Implementation","Response to intervention"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["931912204"],"render_values":[{"text":"931912204","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2982","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Booth, Julie L."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["DuCette, Joseph P.","Pendergast, Laura L.","Schifter, Catherine","Thurman, S. Kenneth"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hart, Jonathan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-11-04T15:19:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-11-04T15:19:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Temple University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Educational psychology","Educational tests and measurements","Education, Special","Aimsweb","Implementation","Response to intervention"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["931912204"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2982"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The current research study examined one district's journey through Response to Intervention (RtI) implementation. RtI is a program, now written into federal legislation (IDEIA, 2004; NCLB, 2002), that allows school districts to intervene with additional research-based education resources for struggling students. Districts are able to do this as a means of intervention prior to referral to special education in addition to identifying a student as eligible for special education services. The literature guiding districts through the RtI implementation process describes the components of RtI (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2006; Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007) but lacks empirical research to establish the effectiveness of RtI in terms of student achievement. This dissertation seeks to add to the current literature by examining student outcomes before and after implementation of an RtI framework, analyzing the use of assessments to determine student placement into intervention services, and noting the perceptions of teachers during implementation. The results of this study will assist school districts by presenting student data trends that occurred before and after implementation, which may affect district practices and policy. In addition, implications for future research are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: AN EXAMINATION OF STUDENT OUTCOMES BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTATION"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Booth, Julie L."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["DuCette, Joseph P.","Pendergast, Laura L.","Schifter, Catherine","Thurman, S. Kenneth"],"dc:creator":["Hart, Jonathan"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-11-04T15:19:59Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-11-04T15:19:59Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015"],"dc:description.abstract":["The current research study examined one district's journey through Response to Intervention (RtI) implementation. RtI is a program, now written into federal legislation (IDEIA, 2004; NCLB, 2002), that allows school districts to intervene with additional research-based education resources for struggling students. Districts are able to do this as a means of intervention prior to referral to special education in addition to identifying a student as eligible for special education services. The literature guiding districts through the RtI implementation process describes the components of RtI (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2006; Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007) but lacks empirical research to establish the effectiveness of RtI in terms of student achievement. This dissertation seeks to add to the current literature by examining student outcomes before and after implementation of an RtI framework, analyzing the use of assessments to determine student placement into intervention services, and noting the perceptions of teachers during implementation. The results of this study will assist school districts by presenting student data trends that occurred before and after implementation, which may affect district practices and policy. In addition, implications for future research are discussed."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:identifier.other":["931912204"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2982"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Temple University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Educational psychology","Educational tests and measurements","Education, Special","Aimsweb","Implementation","Response to intervention"],"dc:title":["RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: AN EXAMINATION OF STUDENT OUTCOMES BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTATION"],"dc:type":["Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:19:39Z"}