{"id":{"repo_id":"temple","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/11532"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/temple/oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/11532","repository":{"repo_id":"temple","name":"Temple University","base_url":"https://scholarshare.temple.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The neural correlates of social and non-social decision-making in resolving complex, dynamic uncertainty","abstract":"Understanding how people form appraisals under uncertainty is a foundational challenge for social cognition research. Naturalistic stimuli are a powerful tool for modeling these processes, but the cognitive and neural dynamics that govern real-time appraisal during complex narratives remain underexplored. Across three studies, this dissertation investigated how individuals dynamically appraise social and non-social ambiguity using a 45-minute episode of a murder mystery drama. In the first fMRI study, participants continuously rated their certainty regarding a primary character’s guilt. Neural synchrony during this appraisal task was examined via inter-subject correlation and sliding window approaches, revealing temporally dynamic, content-sensitive neural alignment in social-cognitive networks. The second study extended this design behaviorally, examining the structure and variability of hypothesis generation across individuals. The third study manipulated appraisals directly, instructing participants to assess the informativeness of scenes in relation to a guilt hypothesis. Integrating these findings, the dissertation demonstrates that stimulus complexity and interpretive framing jointly modulate appraisal synchrony, and that these processes are supported by distributed regions in the default mode, salience, and attentional networks. These findings advance our understanding of how people resolve social ambiguity in real time and highlight the value of continuous self-report and dynamic brain-behavior alignment in naturalistic settings. Implications for social inference and real-world decision-making are discussed.","abstract_html":"Understanding how people form appraisals under uncertainty is a foundational challenge for social cognition research. Naturalistic stimuli are a powerful tool for modeling these processes, but the cognitive and neural dynamics that govern real-time appraisal during complex narratives remain underexplored. Across three studies, this dissertation investigated how individuals dynamically appraise social and non-social ambiguity using a 45-minute episode of a murder mystery drama. In the first fMRI study, participants continuously rated their certainty regarding a primary character’s guilt. Neural synchrony during this appraisal task was examined via inter-subject correlation and sliding window approaches, revealing temporally dynamic, content-sensitive neural alignment in social-cognitive networks. The second study extended this design behaviorally, examining the structure and variability of hypothesis generation across individuals. The third study manipulated appraisals directly, instructing participants to assess the informativeness of scenes in relation to a guilt hypothesis. Integrating these findings, the dissertation demonstrates that stimulus complexity and interpretive framing jointly modulate appraisal synchrony, and that these processes are supported by distributed regions in the default mode, salience, and attentional networks. These findings advance our understanding of how people resolve social ambiguity in real time and highlight the value of continuous self-report and dynamic brain-behavior alignment in naturalistic settings. Implications for social inference and real-world decision-making are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mitchell, William"],"institution":"Temple University. Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Helion, Chelsea"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Chein, Jason M.","Smith, David V.","Murty, Vishnu P.","Olino, Thomas"],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-12","date_published":"2025-12","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:19:51Z","subjects":["Neurosciences","Social psychology","Experimental psychology","Ambiguity","Decision-making","Entropy","Heuristics","Naturalistic","Social cognition","Psychology"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarshare.temple.edu/handle/20.500.12613/11532","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Helion, Chelsea"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Chein, Jason M.","Smith, David V.","Murty, Vishnu P.","Olino, Thomas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mitchell, William"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-03-04T02:25:45Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-03-04T02:25:45Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Temple University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Neurosciences","Social psychology","Experimental psychology","Ambiguity","Decision-making","Entropy","Heuristics","Naturalistic","Social cognition","Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://scholarshare.temple.edu/handle/20.500.12613/11532"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Understanding how people form appraisals under uncertainty is a foundational challenge for social cognition research. Naturalistic stimuli are a powerful tool for modeling these processes, but the cognitive and neural dynamics that govern real-time appraisal during complex narratives remain underexplored. Across three studies, this dissertation investigated how individuals dynamically appraise social and non-social ambiguity using a 45-minute episode of a murder mystery drama. In the first fMRI study, participants continuously rated their certainty regarding a primary character’s guilt. Neural synchrony during this appraisal task was examined via inter-subject correlation and sliding window approaches, revealing temporally dynamic, content-sensitive neural alignment in social-cognitive networks. The second study extended this design behaviorally, examining the structure and variability of hypothesis generation across individuals. The third study manipulated appraisals directly, instructing participants to assess the informativeness of scenes in relation to a guilt hypothesis. Integrating these findings, the dissertation demonstrates that stimulus complexity and interpretive framing jointly modulate appraisal synchrony, and that these processes are supported by distributed regions in the default mode, salience, and attentional networks. These findings advance our understanding of how people resolve social ambiguity in real time and highlight the value of continuous self-report and dynamic brain-behavior alignment in naturalistic settings. Implications for social inference and real-world decision-making are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The neural correlates of social and non-social decision-making in resolving complex, dynamic uncertainty"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Helion, Chelsea"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Chein, Jason M.","Smith, David V.","Murty, Vishnu P.","Olino, Thomas"],"dc:creator":["Mitchell, William"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-03-04T02:25:45Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-03-04T02:25:45Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["Understanding how people form appraisals under uncertainty is a foundational challenge for social cognition research. Naturalistic stimuli are a powerful tool for modeling these processes, but the cognitive and neural dynamics that govern real-time appraisal during complex narratives remain underexplored. Across three studies, this dissertation investigated how individuals dynamically appraise social and non-social ambiguity using a 45-minute episode of a murder mystery drama. In the first fMRI study, participants continuously rated their certainty regarding a primary character’s guilt. Neural synchrony during this appraisal task was examined via inter-subject correlation and sliding window approaches, revealing temporally dynamic, content-sensitive neural alignment in social-cognitive networks. The second study extended this design behaviorally, examining the structure and variability of hypothesis generation across individuals. The third study manipulated appraisals directly, instructing participants to assess the informativeness of scenes in relation to a guilt hypothesis. Integrating these findings, the dissertation demonstrates that stimulus complexity and interpretive framing jointly modulate appraisal synchrony, and that these processes are supported by distributed regions in the default mode, salience, and attentional networks. These findings advance our understanding of how people resolve social ambiguity in real time and highlight the value of continuous self-report and dynamic brain-behavior alignment in naturalistic settings. Implications for social inference and real-world decision-making are discussed."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://scholarshare.temple.edu/handle/20.500.12613/11532"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Temple University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Neurosciences","Social psychology","Experimental psychology","Ambiguity","Decision-making","Entropy","Heuristics","Naturalistic","Social cognition","Psychology"],"dc:title":["The neural correlates of social and non-social decision-making in resolving complex, dynamic uncertainty"],"dc:type":["Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:19:51Z"}