This study examines how leaders of transnational NGOs (TNGOs) across the United States understand transnational activism and the roles their organizations play in world affairs. Three roles are identified: alleviation, realization and environmentalism. Analysis suggests that scholarship in international relations focuses disproportionately on the least common and least resourceful types of TNGOs and routinely mischaracterizes a small number of highly visible organizations as exemplary. Leaders' perspectives on organizational mission, activities, autonomy, collaboration, effectiveness and obstacles reveal that the most numerous and resourceful TNGOs are technocratic agencies favoring a materialistic, ameliorative approach to transnational activism. Moreover, to the extent that TNGOs exercise ideational power to achieve sociopolitical change, this power more closely resembles technocratic managerialism than overt political contention. Insights are derived from a mixed-method analysis of over 200 hours of in-depth interviews with top leaders from a diverse sample of 152 TNGOs registered in the United States.
","abstract_html":"<p>This study examines how leaders of transnational NGOs (TNGOs) across the United States understand transnational activism and the roles their organizations play in world affairs. Three roles are identified: alleviation, realization and environmentalism. Analysis suggests that scholarship in international relations focuses disproportionately on the least common and least resourceful types of TNGOs and routinely mischaracterizes a small number of highly visible organizations as exemplary. Leaders' perspectives on organizational mission, activities, autonomy, collaboration, effectiveness and obstacles reveal that the most numerous and resourceful TNGOs are technocratic agencies favoring a materialistic, ameliorative approach to transnational activism. Moreover, to the extent that TNGOs exercise ideational power to achieve sociopolitical change, this power more closely resembles technocratic managerialism than overt political contention. Insights are derived from a mixed-method analysis of over 200 hours of in-depth interviews with top leaders from a diverse sample of 152 TNGOs registered in the United States.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mitchell, George E."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hans Peter Schmitz"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:54:02Z","subjects":["elite interviews","finite mixture modeling","mixed-method","socially distributed conceptualizations","transnational activism","transnational NGOs","Political Science"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/98","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hans Peter Schmitz"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mitchell, George E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["elite interviews","finite mixture modeling","mixed-method","socially distributed conceptualizations","transnational activism","transnational NGOs","Political Science"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/98"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study examines how leaders of transnational NGOs (TNGOs) across the United States understand transnational activism and the roles their organizations play in world affairs. Three roles are identified: alleviation, realization and environmentalism. Analysis suggests that scholarship in international relations focuses disproportionately on the least common and least resourceful types of TNGOs and routinely mischaracterizes a small number of highly visible organizations as exemplary. Leaders' perspectives on organizational mission, activities, autonomy, collaboration, effectiveness and obstacles reveal that the most numerous and resourceful TNGOs are technocratic agencies favoring a materialistic, ameliorative approach to transnational activism. Moreover, to the extent that TNGOs exercise ideational power to achieve sociopolitical change, this power more closely resembles technocratic managerialism than overt political contention. Insights are derived from a mixed-method analysis of over 200 hours of in-depth interviews with top leaders from a diverse sample of 152 TNGOs registered in the United States.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Transnational NGOs: A US Perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hans Peter Schmitz"],"dc:creator":["Mitchell, George E."],"dc:description.abstract":["This study examines how leaders of transnational NGOs (TNGOs) across the United States understand transnational activism and the roles their organizations play in world affairs. Three roles are identified: alleviation, realization and environmentalism. Analysis suggests that scholarship in international relations focuses disproportionately on the least common and least resourceful types of TNGOs and routinely mischaracterizes a small number of highly visible organizations as exemplary. Leaders' perspectives on organizational mission, activities, autonomy, collaboration, effectiveness and obstacles reveal that the most numerous and resourceful TNGOs are technocratic agencies favoring a materialistic, ameliorative approach to transnational activism. Moreover, to the extent that TNGOs exercise ideational power to achieve sociopolitical change, this power more closely resembles technocratic managerialism than overt political contention. Insights are derived from a mixed-method analysis of over 200 hours of in-depth interviews with top leaders from a diverse sample of 152 TNGOs registered in the United States.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/98"],"dc:subject":["elite interviews","finite mixture modeling","mixed-method","socially distributed conceptualizations","transnational activism","transnational NGOs","Political Science"],"dc:title":["Transnational NGOs: A US Perspective"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:54:02Z"}