{"id":{"repo_id":"strathclyde","oai_identifier":"oai:strathclyde:9g54xh65x"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/strathclyde/oai:strathclyde:9g54xh65x","repository":{"repo_id":"strathclyde","name":"University of Strathclyde","base_url":"https://stax.strath.ac.uk/catalog/oai"},"display":{"title":"Self-efficacy sources and outcome expectations of researchers for sharing knowledge via social media","abstract":"Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage.","abstract_html":"Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Alshahrani, Hussain"],"institution":"University of Strathclyde","degree_name":"phd","degree_level":"doctoral-pg","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pennington, Diane Rasmussen"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:52:45Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.48730/n88w-7z61"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.48730/n88w-7z61","href":"https://doi.org/10.48730/n88w-7z61","code":true}]},{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["T15260"],"render_values":[{"text":"T15260","href":null,"code":true}]},{"key":"dc:creator.authoridentifier","label":"Author Identifier","values":["2010675598"],"render_values":[{"text":"2010675598","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/9g54xh65x","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pennington, Diane Rasmussen"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Alshahrani, Hussain"]},{"key":"dc:creator.authoridentifier","label":"Author Identifier","values":["2010675598"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Computer and Information Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Strathclyde"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral-pg"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["phd"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["T15260"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.48730/n88w-7z61"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/9g54xh65x"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis was previously held under moratorium from 20th August 2019 to 20th August 2020.","Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Self-efficacy sources and outcome expectations of researchers for sharing knowledge via social media"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pennington, Diane Rasmussen"],"dc:creator":["Alshahrani, Hussain"],"dc:creator.authoridentifier":["2010675598"],"dc:date":["2019"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description":["This thesis was previously held under moratorium from 20th August 2019 to 20th August 2020.","Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage."],"dc:description.abstract":["Although social media is a vital way to communicate and share knowledge, the researchers' use is still less than expected. This may be due to their lack of self-efficacy or lack of knowledge of outcomes from its use. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of researchers and their impact on the use of social media for knowledge sharing. To provide a theoretical framework, this research adopted social cognitive theory, which contains two important concepts are self-efficacy and outcome expectations. It investigated sources of self-efficacy and types of outcome expectations to address the research objectives and questions. This study has employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It started with qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with thirty researchers from University of Strathclyde. The data were analysed by using a qualitative directed content analysis approach. In quantitative approach, online questionnaire was used to substantiate the qualitative findings. The total participants in this questionnaire was 144 researchers also from University of Strathclyde and the data were analysed by using descriptive statistics. This study found that researchers relied on the four sources of self-efficacy for using this media. They lead researchers to use it effectively, although some may discourage its use. It also found that researchers expect social and personal outcomes from its use. Each type has positive and negative forms, which can motivate or prevent researchers from use it. This study develops a theoretical framework by identifying levels of importance of these sources and types of outcomes as applied to a real-life online context. In a practical light, this helps researchers to understand these sources and outcomes and determine how they can develop in order to increase their confidence and use. Finally, institutions can encourage their staff, particularly researchers, to use it for their competitive advantage."],"dc:identifier":["T15260"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.48730/n88w-7z61"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/9g54xh65x"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Computer and Information Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Strathclyde"],"dc:title":["Self-efficacy sources and outcome expectations of researchers for sharing knowledge via social media"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral-pg"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["phd"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:52:45Z"}