{"id":{"repo_id":"southwales","oai_identifier":"oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/southwales/oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c","repository":{"repo_id":"southwales","name":"University of South Wales","base_url":"https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/ws/oai"},"display":{"title":"Rethinking Intelligence: Critical Perspectives on Security, Ethics and Institutional Practice","abstract":"This thesis reexamines intelligence as both practice and object of inquiry in contemporary security frameworks. Grounded in Critical Intelligence Studies (CIS), it challenges state-centric, positivist assumptions, and argues that intelligence is a socially embedded, ethically charged process. Methodologically, the critical overview adopts a reflexive, concept-led mapping of three interrelated projects onto the micro, meso, and macro dimensions of the Intelligence-Security Tension and deploys that vertical schema to organise the chapters.<br/><br/>Project 1 analyses crowdsourced crisis-mapping in Libya, showing that ostensibly “open” data still demand rigorous source-protection norms at the micro (ethical) level. Project 2 investigates the cultural and bureaucratic disconnect between intelligence analysis and security policy in a diplomatic security context, highlighting meso-level institutional barriers. Project 3 tests the assumption that larger intelligence capacity inevitably yields better security, employing partial least-squares structural-equation modelling to expose macro-level contradictions when effectiveness is measured through a human security lens.<br/><br/>Considered together, the three studies demonstrate how intelligence can simultaneously enable and undermine security objectives. Synthesizing their insights, this thesis proposes a vertically integrated model linking information stewardship, institutional receptivity, and human security impact. Practical recommendations follow for source-protection protocols, intelligence-policy integration, and the metrics by which success is judged. The work therefore calls for an accountable, people-centred, and critically engaged intelligence paradigm suited to twenty-first-century security challenges.","abstract_html":"This thesis reexamines intelligence as both practice and object of inquiry in contemporary security frameworks. Grounded in Critical Intelligence Studies (CIS), it challenges state-centric, positivist assumptions, and argues that intelligence is a socially embedded, ethically charged process. Methodologically, the critical overview adopts a reflexive, concept-led mapping of three interrelated projects onto the micro, meso, and macro dimensions of the Intelligence-Security Tension and deploys that vertical schema to organise the chapters.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Project 1 analyses crowdsourced crisis-mapping in Libya, showing that ostensibly “open” data still demand rigorous source-protection norms at the micro (ethical) level. Project 2 investigates the cultural and bureaucratic disconnect between intelligence analysis and security policy in a diplomatic security context, highlighting meso-level institutional barriers. Project 3 tests the assumption that larger intelligence capacity inevitably yields better security, employing partial least-squares structural-equation modelling to expose macro-level contradictions when effectiveness is measured through a human security lens.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Considered together, the three studies demonstrate how intelligence can simultaneously enable and undermine security objectives. Synthesizing their insights, this thesis proposes a vertically integrated model linking information stewardship, institutional receptivity, and human security impact. Practical recommendations follow for source-protection protocols, intelligence-policy integration, and the metrics by which success is judged. The work therefore calls for an accountable, people-centred, and critically engaged intelligence paradigm suited to twenty-first-century security challenges.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Stottlemyre, Steven"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctoral Thesis","degree_level":"Student thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kaunert, Christian","Leonard, Sarah","Wertman, Or"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026","date_published":"2026","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:40:03Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"],"render_values":[{"text":"oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kaunert, Christian","Leonard, Sarah","Wertman, Or"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Stottlemyre, Steven"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2026"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2026"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Student thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctoral Thesis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c","https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/files/37305430/Stottlemyre_-_Amended_Thesis_Main_Text.pdf","https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/files/37305431/Stottlemyre_-_Amended_Thesis_Appendices.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis reexamines intelligence as both practice and object of inquiry in contemporary security frameworks. Grounded in Critical Intelligence Studies (CIS), it challenges state-centric, positivist assumptions, and argues that intelligence is a socially embedded, ethically charged process. Methodologically, the critical overview adopts a reflexive, concept-led mapping of three interrelated projects onto the micro, meso, and macro dimensions of the Intelligence-Security Tension and deploys that vertical schema to organise the chapters.<br/><br/>Project 1 analyses crowdsourced crisis-mapping in Libya, showing that ostensibly “open” data still demand rigorous source-protection norms at the micro (ethical) level. Project 2 investigates the cultural and bureaucratic disconnect between intelligence analysis and security policy in a diplomatic security context, highlighting meso-level institutional barriers. Project 3 tests the assumption that larger intelligence capacity inevitably yields better security, employing partial least-squares structural-equation modelling to expose macro-level contradictions when effectiveness is measured through a human security lens.<br/><br/>Considered together, the three studies demonstrate how intelligence can simultaneously enable and undermine security objectives. Synthesizing their insights, this thesis proposes a vertically integrated model linking information stewardship, institutional receptivity, and human security impact. Practical recommendations follow for source-protection protocols, intelligence-policy integration, and the metrics by which success is judged. The work therefore calls for an accountable, people-centred, and critically engaged intelligence paradigm suited to twenty-first-century security challenges."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Rethinking Intelligence: Critical Perspectives on Security, Ethics and Institutional Practice"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kaunert, Christian","Leonard, Sarah","Wertman, Or"],"dc:creator":["Stottlemyre, Steven"],"dc:date":["2026"],"dc:date.issued":["2026"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis reexamines intelligence as both practice and object of inquiry in contemporary security frameworks. Grounded in Critical Intelligence Studies (CIS), it challenges state-centric, positivist assumptions, and argues that intelligence is a socially embedded, ethically charged process. Methodologically, the critical overview adopts a reflexive, concept-led mapping of three interrelated projects onto the micro, meso, and macro dimensions of the Intelligence-Security Tension and deploys that vertical schema to organise the chapters.<br/><br/>Project 1 analyses crowdsourced crisis-mapping in Libya, showing that ostensibly “open” data still demand rigorous source-protection norms at the micro (ethical) level. Project 2 investigates the cultural and bureaucratic disconnect between intelligence analysis and security policy in a diplomatic security context, highlighting meso-level institutional barriers. Project 3 tests the assumption that larger intelligence capacity inevitably yields better security, employing partial least-squares structural-equation modelling to expose macro-level contradictions when effectiveness is measured through a human security lens.<br/><br/>Considered together, the three studies demonstrate how intelligence can simultaneously enable and undermine security objectives. Synthesizing their insights, this thesis proposes a vertically integrated model linking information stewardship, institutional receptivity, and human security impact. Practical recommendations follow for source-protection protocols, intelligence-policy integration, and the metrics by which success is judged. The work therefore calls for an accountable, people-centred, and critically engaged intelligence paradigm suited to twenty-first-century security challenges."],"dc:identifier":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c","https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/files/37305430/Stottlemyre_-_Amended_Thesis_Main_Text.pdf","https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/files/37305431/Stottlemyre_-_Amended_Thesis_Appendices.pdf"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://pure.southwales.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/e3408fe6-6eee-45f2-ae22-dc40454dba7c"],"dc:title":["Rethinking Intelligence: Critical Perspectives on Security, Ethics and Institutional Practice"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Student thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctoral Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:40:03Z"}