Integration of 2-D high-resolution shallow seismic reflection and refraction, gravity, 2-D electrical resistivity, Ground Penetrating Radar, and borehole data were used to image the shallow subsurface expression of the Camden fault. The preferred model for the fault geometry suggests at least 28 m apparent offset of the Upper Cretaceous unconformity across a high-angle, northwest dipping, 21 m wide, reverse fault zone. The fault is interpreted to separate the Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic basement (Richtex Formation of Carolina terrane) on the northwestern side from the Modoc shear zone (MSZ) on the southeast side (sheared rocks of low-grade Richtex Formation and high-grade Mylonitic orthogneiss, Dreher Shoals terrane). The Camden fault is interpreted to be the brittle fault flanking the Alleghanian MSZ. The latest movement on the fault is constrained to be either late Cretaceous in age by offsets in the base of the Middendorf Formation, or younger, mid-Miocene by disturbances to the Upland Unit.
","abstract_html":"<p>Integration of 2-D high-resolution shallow seismic reflection and refraction, gravity, 2-D electrical resistivity, Ground Penetrating Radar, and borehole data were used to image the shallow subsurface expression of the Camden fault. The preferred model for the fault geometry suggests at least 28 m apparent offset of the Upper Cretaceous unconformity across a high-angle, northwest dipping, 21 m wide, reverse fault zone. The fault is interpreted to separate the Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic basement (Richtex Formation of Carolina terrane) on the northwestern side from the Modoc shear zone (MSZ) on the southeast side (sheared rocks of low-grade Richtex Formation and high-grade Mylonitic orthogneiss, Dreher Shoals terrane). The Camden fault is interpreted to be the brittle fault flanking the Alleghanian MSZ. The latest movement on the fault is constrained to be either late Cretaceous in age by offsets in the base of the Middendorf Formation, or younger, mid-Miocene by disturbances to the Upland Unit.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Nedorub, Olga Igorevna"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Campus Access Thesis","degree_discipline":"Earth and Ocean Sciences","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Camelia C Knapp"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:38:31Z","subjects":["Earth Sciences","Geology","Physical Sciences and Mathematics","Camden fault","Cenozoic reactivation","Eastern North America Margin","Integrated geophysical investigation","Seismic profile","Upland Unit"],"languages":[],"rights":["© 2012, Olga Igorevna Nedorub"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1336","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Camelia C Knapp"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Nedorub, Olga Igorevna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Earth and Ocean Sciences"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Campus Access Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Earth Sciences","Geology","Physical Sciences and Mathematics","Camden fault","Cenozoic reactivation","Eastern North America Margin","Integrated geophysical investigation","Seismic profile","Upland Unit"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2012, Olga Igorevna Nedorub"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1336"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Integration of 2-D high-resolution shallow seismic reflection and refraction, gravity, 2-D electrical resistivity, Ground Penetrating Radar, and borehole data were used to image the shallow subsurface expression of the Camden fault. The preferred model for the fault geometry suggests at least 28 m apparent offset of the Upper Cretaceous unconformity across a high-angle, northwest dipping, 21 m wide, reverse fault zone. The fault is interpreted to separate the Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic basement (Richtex Formation of Carolina terrane) on the northwestern side from the Modoc shear zone (MSZ) on the southeast side (sheared rocks of low-grade Richtex Formation and high-grade Mylonitic orthogneiss, Dreher Shoals terrane). The Camden fault is interpreted to be the brittle fault flanking the Alleghanian MSZ. The latest movement on the fault is constrained to be either late Cretaceous in age by offsets in the base of the Middendorf Formation, or younger, mid-Miocene by disturbances to the Upland Unit.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["New Constraints On the Age and Magnitude of Reactivation of the Camden Fault, South Carolina"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Camelia C Knapp"],"dc:creator":["Nedorub, Olga Igorevna"],"dc:description.abstract":["Integration of 2-D high-resolution shallow seismic reflection and refraction, gravity, 2-D electrical resistivity, Ground Penetrating Radar, and borehole data were used to image the shallow subsurface expression of the Camden fault. The preferred model for the fault geometry suggests at least 28 m apparent offset of the Upper Cretaceous unconformity across a high-angle, northwest dipping, 21 m wide, reverse fault zone. The fault is interpreted to separate the Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic basement (Richtex Formation of Carolina terrane) on the northwestern side from the Modoc shear zone (MSZ) on the southeast side (sheared rocks of low-grade Richtex Formation and high-grade Mylonitic orthogneiss, Dreher Shoals terrane). The Camden fault is interpreted to be the brittle fault flanking the Alleghanian MSZ. The latest movement on the fault is constrained to be either late Cretaceous in age by offsets in the base of the Middendorf Formation, or younger, mid-Miocene by disturbances to the Upland Unit.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1336"],"dc:rights":["© 2012, Olga Igorevna Nedorub"],"dc:subject":["Earth Sciences","Geology","Physical Sciences and Mathematics","Camden fault","Cenozoic reactivation","Eastern North America Margin","Integrated geophysical investigation","Seismic profile","Upland Unit"],"dc:title":["New Constraints On the Age and Magnitude of Reactivation of the Camden Fault, South Carolina"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Earth and Ocean Sciences"],"thesis:degree_level":["Campus Access Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:38:31Z"}