Back to results

University of Southampton

A critical comparison of William James and Søren Kierkegaard on religious belief

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis is a critical comparison of the accounts of religious belief proposed by<br/>William James and Søren Kierkegaard. Both James and Kierkegaard greatly emphasize<br/>the subjective aspects of religious belief. In view of this fact, surprisingly little<br/>comparative work has been done in this area. I contribute to this literature in two ways.<br/>Firstly, I make a brief assessment of what James knew of Kierkegaard’s work.<br/>Secondly, I draw four comparisons between Kierkegaard and James. In Chapter One I<br/>examine the claim that Kierkegaard proposes a pragmatist account of faith of the kind<br/>that James sets out in his essay The Will To Believe. I argue that this claim rests on a<br/>misunderstanding of Kierkegaard’s argument that to have faith is to take a risk. In the<br/>following chapter I discuss James’s and Kierkegaard’s views on formal proofs for the<br/>existence of God. Both philosophers reject the notion that faith can be based on such<br/>proofs. I distinguish between their positions, and argue in favour of Kierkegaard’s. In<br/>the third chapter I compare Kierkegaard’s and James’s accounts of religious experience.<br/>James views religious experiences as a special kind of evidence for the existence of<br/>God. For Kierkegaard it is a mistake to view religious experiences as evidence. Such<br/>experiences should be understood in relation to the concept of religious authority. In the<br/>final chapter I examine Kierkegaard’s conception of faith as a life-view. I argue that for<br/>Kierkegaard a life-view is a fundamental perspective on one’s existence. I compare this<br/>conception with James’s concept of philosophical temperament and in relation to his<br/>discussion of the sick soul.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Ph.D.
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Southampton
Year dc:date.issued
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Chipp, Jonathan
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Schoenbaumsfeld, Genia

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Southampton
Base URL
eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Chipp, Jonathan. A critical comparison of William James and Søren Kierkegaard on religious belief. doctoral thesis, University of Southampton, 2009.