{"id":{"repo_id":"soton","oai_identifier":"oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:142803"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/soton/oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:142803","repository":{"repo_id":"soton","name":"University of Southampton","base_url":"https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Performance analysis of a reduced cost manufacturing process for composite aircraft secondary structure","abstract":"In the current, environmentally-aware, climate aircraft designers are under increasing pressure to<br/>produce fuel efficient vehicles. Weight reduction is an important method for increasing fuel<br/>efficiency. Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are known to offer weight savings over<br/>traditional metallic components, due to their excellent stiffness and strength to weight ratios.<br/>However, the major limiting factor for the use of aerospace quality composites is the<br/>manufacturing cost. The costs incurred in the conventional process of prepreg cured in an<br/>autoclave are well documented. The research in this thesis is concerned with reducing the cost of<br/>manufacturing aircraft standard carbon fibre composite sandwich panels, whilst maintaining<br/>mechanical performance.<br/><br/>The overall aim of the EngD is to provide a unified approach for assessing the performance of<br/>carbon fibre sandwich secondary structure that are manufactured using several different<br/>techniques. Cost and performance criteria are defined so that an optimal panel can be produced.<br/>The work has been motivated by the industrial sponsor, GE Aviation Systems. Five combinations<br/>of raw material and processing techniques, manufacturing options (MOs) were considered in<br/>incremental steps from the baseline of unidirectional prepreg cured in an autoclave to the noncrimp<br/>fabric (NCF) infiltrated using resin film infusion (RFI) and cured in a conventional oven.<br/>For cost and performance analysis a generic panel has been designed that is representative of<br/>secondary wing structure on commercial passenger aircraft. The cost was estimated by monitoring<br/>the manufacture of generic panels using each MO, whilst the performance was measured by both<br/>mechanical characterisation tests and by full scale tests on a custom designed rig. The rig applies a<br/>pressure load using a water cushion and allows optical access to the surface of the panel enabling<br/>the use of optical techniques, i.e. thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) and digital image correlation<br/>(DIC). Feasibility tests on TSA and DIC demonstrated their use on the materials considered in<br/>this thesis, and were used to validate finite element (FE) models.<br/><br/>The RFI out-of-autoclave process was found to reduce generic panel manufacture time by almost<br/>30%, and the material cost was reduced by almost 40%. The mechanical characterisation tests<br/>suggested the ‘new’ process could produce laminates with a similar fibre volume fraction to that of<br/>the original process and similar in and out-of-plane mechanical properties. The in-plane stiffness<br/>was slightly reduced by 7 %, but the strength showed an increase of 12%. Full scale tests on the<br/>generic panels using point out-of-plane deflection measurements and full field TSA demonstrated<br/>the panel produced using the ‘new’ process has adequate performance. Moreover the full-field<br/>tests indicated an improvement in performance. Further work is required to optimise the design of<br/>the panel for weight, in particular the weight of the raw material, and investigating methods for<br/>modelling the NCF for certification.","abstract_html":"In the current, environmentally-aware, climate aircraft designers are under increasing pressure to&lt;br/&gt;produce fuel efficient vehicles. Weight reduction is an important method for increasing fuel&lt;br/&gt;efficiency. Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are known to offer weight savings over&lt;br/&gt;traditional metallic components, due to their excellent stiffness and strength to weight ratios.&lt;br/&gt;However, the major limiting factor for the use of aerospace quality composites is the&lt;br/&gt;manufacturing cost. The costs incurred in the conventional process of prepreg cured in an&lt;br/&gt;autoclave are well documented. The research in this thesis is concerned with reducing the cost of&lt;br/&gt;manufacturing aircraft standard carbon fibre composite sandwich panels, whilst maintaining&lt;br/&gt;mechanical performance.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The overall aim of the EngD is to provide a unified approach for assessing the performance of&lt;br/&gt;carbon fibre sandwich secondary structure that are manufactured using several different&lt;br/&gt;techniques. Cost and performance criteria are defined so that an optimal panel can be produced.&lt;br/&gt;The work has been motivated by the industrial sponsor, GE Aviation Systems. Five combinations&lt;br/&gt;of raw material and processing techniques, manufacturing options (MOs) were considered in&lt;br/&gt;incremental steps from the baseline of unidirectional prepreg cured in an autoclave to the noncrimp&lt;br/&gt;fabric (NCF) infiltrated using resin film infusion (RFI) and cured in a conventional oven.&lt;br/&gt;For cost and performance analysis a generic panel has been designed that is representative of&lt;br/&gt;secondary wing structure on commercial passenger aircraft. The cost was estimated by monitoring&lt;br/&gt;the manufacture of generic panels using each MO, whilst the performance was measured by both&lt;br/&gt;mechanical characterisation tests and by full scale tests on a custom designed rig. The rig applies a&lt;br/&gt;pressure load using a water cushion and allows optical access to the surface of the panel enabling&lt;br/&gt;the use of optical techniques, i.e. thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) and digital image correlation&lt;br/&gt;(DIC). Feasibility tests on TSA and DIC demonstrated their use on the materials considered in&lt;br/&gt;this thesis, and were used to validate finite element (FE) models.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The RFI out-of-autoclave process was found to reduce generic panel manufacture time by almost&lt;br/&gt;30%, and the material cost was reduced by almost 40%. The mechanical characterisation tests&lt;br/&gt;suggested the ‘new’ process could produce laminates with a similar fibre volume fraction to that of&lt;br/&gt;the original process and similar in and out-of-plane mechanical properties. The in-plane stiffness&lt;br/&gt;was slightly reduced by 7 %, but the strength showed an increase of 12%. Full scale tests on the&lt;br/&gt;generic panels using point out-of-plane deflection measurements and full field TSA demonstrated&lt;br/&gt;the panel produced using the ‘new’ process has adequate performance. Moreover the full-field&lt;br/&gt;tests indicated an improvement in performance. Further work is required to optimise the design of&lt;br/&gt;the panel for weight, in particular the weight of the raw material, and investigating methods for&lt;br/&gt;modelling the NCF for certification.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Crump, Duncan Andrew"],"institution":"University of Southampton","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Barton, Janice"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-04","date_published":"2009-04","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:36:14Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Barton, Janice"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Crump, Duncan Andrew"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2009-04"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2009-04"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Institute of Sound & Vibration Research (pre 2011 reorg)","School of Engineering Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Southampton"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/142803/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Ph.D."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/142803/1/EngDthesis_crump2009_FSI.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In the current, environmentally-aware, climate aircraft designers are under increasing pressure to<br/>produce fuel efficient vehicles. Weight reduction is an important method for increasing fuel<br/>efficiency. Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are known to offer weight savings over<br/>traditional metallic components, due to their excellent stiffness and strength to weight ratios.<br/>However, the major limiting factor for the use of aerospace quality composites is the<br/>manufacturing cost. The costs incurred in the conventional process of prepreg cured in an<br/>autoclave are well documented. The research in this thesis is concerned with reducing the cost of<br/>manufacturing aircraft standard carbon fibre composite sandwich panels, whilst maintaining<br/>mechanical performance.<br/><br/>The overall aim of the EngD is to provide a unified approach for assessing the performance of<br/>carbon fibre sandwich secondary structure that are manufactured using several different<br/>techniques. Cost and performance criteria are defined so that an optimal panel can be produced.<br/>The work has been motivated by the industrial sponsor, GE Aviation Systems. Five combinations<br/>of raw material and processing techniques, manufacturing options (MOs) were considered in<br/>incremental steps from the baseline of unidirectional prepreg cured in an autoclave to the noncrimp<br/>fabric (NCF) infiltrated using resin film infusion (RFI) and cured in a conventional oven.<br/>For cost and performance analysis a generic panel has been designed that is representative of<br/>secondary wing structure on commercial passenger aircraft. The cost was estimated by monitoring<br/>the manufacture of generic panels using each MO, whilst the performance was measured by both<br/>mechanical characterisation tests and by full scale tests on a custom designed rig. The rig applies a<br/>pressure load using a water cushion and allows optical access to the surface of the panel enabling<br/>the use of optical techniques, i.e. thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) and digital image correlation<br/>(DIC). Feasibility tests on TSA and DIC demonstrated their use on the materials considered in<br/>this thesis, and were used to validate finite element (FE) models.<br/><br/>The RFI out-of-autoclave process was found to reduce generic panel manufacture time by almost<br/>30%, and the material cost was reduced by almost 40%. The mechanical characterisation tests<br/>suggested the ‘new’ process could produce laminates with a similar fibre volume fraction to that of<br/>the original process and similar in and out-of-plane mechanical properties. The in-plane stiffness<br/>was slightly reduced by 7 %, but the strength showed an increase of 12%. Full scale tests on the<br/>generic panels using point out-of-plane deflection measurements and full field TSA demonstrated<br/>the panel produced using the ‘new’ process has adequate performance. Moreover the full-field<br/>tests indicated an improvement in performance. Further work is required to optimise the design of<br/>the panel for weight, in particular the weight of the raw material, and investigating methods for<br/>modelling the NCF for certification."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Performance analysis of a reduced cost manufacturing process for composite aircraft secondary structure"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Barton, Janice"],"dc:creator":["Crump, Duncan Andrew"],"dc:date":["2009-04"],"dc:date.issued":["2009-04"],"dc:description.abstract":["In the current, environmentally-aware, climate aircraft designers are under increasing pressure to<br/>produce fuel efficient vehicles. Weight reduction is an important method for increasing fuel<br/>efficiency. Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are known to offer weight savings over<br/>traditional metallic components, due to their excellent stiffness and strength to weight ratios.<br/>However, the major limiting factor for the use of aerospace quality composites is the<br/>manufacturing cost. The costs incurred in the conventional process of prepreg cured in an<br/>autoclave are well documented. The research in this thesis is concerned with reducing the cost of<br/>manufacturing aircraft standard carbon fibre composite sandwich panels, whilst maintaining<br/>mechanical performance.<br/><br/>The overall aim of the EngD is to provide a unified approach for assessing the performance of<br/>carbon fibre sandwich secondary structure that are manufactured using several different<br/>techniques. Cost and performance criteria are defined so that an optimal panel can be produced.<br/>The work has been motivated by the industrial sponsor, GE Aviation Systems. Five combinations<br/>of raw material and processing techniques, manufacturing options (MOs) were considered in<br/>incremental steps from the baseline of unidirectional prepreg cured in an autoclave to the noncrimp<br/>fabric (NCF) infiltrated using resin film infusion (RFI) and cured in a conventional oven.<br/>For cost and performance analysis a generic panel has been designed that is representative of<br/>secondary wing structure on commercial passenger aircraft. The cost was estimated by monitoring<br/>the manufacture of generic panels using each MO, whilst the performance was measured by both<br/>mechanical characterisation tests and by full scale tests on a custom designed rig. The rig applies a<br/>pressure load using a water cushion and allows optical access to the surface of the panel enabling<br/>the use of optical techniques, i.e. thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) and digital image correlation<br/>(DIC). Feasibility tests on TSA and DIC demonstrated their use on the materials considered in<br/>this thesis, and were used to validate finite element (FE) models.<br/><br/>The RFI out-of-autoclave process was found to reduce generic panel manufacture time by almost<br/>30%, and the material cost was reduced by almost 40%. The mechanical characterisation tests<br/>suggested the ‘new’ process could produce laminates with a similar fibre volume fraction to that of<br/>the original process and similar in and out-of-plane mechanical properties. The in-plane stiffness<br/>was slightly reduced by 7 %, but the strength showed an increase of 12%. Full scale tests on the<br/>generic panels using point out-of-plane deflection measurements and full field TSA demonstrated<br/>the panel produced using the ‘new’ process has adequate performance. Moreover the full-field<br/>tests indicated an improvement in performance. Further work is required to optimise the design of<br/>the panel for weight, in particular the weight of the raw material, and investigating methods for<br/>modelling the NCF for certification."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/142803/1/EngDthesis_crump2009_FSI.pdf"],"dc:publisher.department":["Institute of Sound & Vibration Research (pre 2011 reorg)","School of Engineering Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Southampton"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/142803/"],"dc:title":["Performance analysis of a reduced cost manufacturing process for composite aircraft secondary structure"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Ph.D."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:36:14Z"}