Southern Illinois University
An Evaluation of Resistance to Change with Unconditioned and Conditioned Reinforcers
Abstract
dc:description.abstractSeveral variables have been shown to influence resistance to change including rate, magnitude, and delay to reinforcement (Nevin, 1974). One variable that has not been studied with humans concerns the evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers. In Experiment 1 (Resistance to Extinction Assessment), 5 participants' behaviors were reinforced during a baseline phase on a mult VI 30 s VI 30 s schedule with either a conditioned (i.e., token) or unconditioned reinforcer (i.e., food). Following equal reinforcement rates across components, extinction was introduced as a disruptor. All participants showed greater resistance to extinction in the component associated with conditioned reinforcers than unconditioned reinforcers. In Experiment 2 (Varied Distractors Assessment), 4 participants experienced a baseline phase the same as Experiment 1 (i.e., mult VI 30 s VI 30 s). Each participant was then exposed to prefeeding and distraction as disruptors in separate analyses. Results showed that behaviors were more resistant to distraction with conditioned than unconditioned reinforcers, similar to Experiment 1. However, when prefeeding disrupted responding, greater resistance to change was observed with unconditioned reinforcers than conditioned reinforcers. Implications of the results are discussed.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Campus Only Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Rehabilitation
- Year
- 2013
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Vargo, Kristina K.
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Ringdahl, Joel
Subjects
dc:subject × 5Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/746
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:opensiuc.lib.siu.edu:dissertations-1749