Back to results

Southern Illinois University

SOCIAL SUPPORT IN RELATION TO PARTNER CONFLICT AND PARTNER VIOLENCE: VIEWPOINTS OF SUPPORT RECIPIENTS AND SUPPORT PROVIDERS

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This investigation included two studies that examined the perspectives of support recipients (Study 1) and support providers (Study 2) regarding the context of social support seeking due to a violent or non-violent conflict with a romantic partner. Study 1 participants (78 female, 78 male) and Study 2 participants (73 female, 89 male) identified predominantly as European-American (48.1% in Study 1 and 50% in Study 2) and African-American (36.5% in Study 1 and 38.9% in Study 2). Social support responses were measured with Ullman's (2010) Social Reactions Questionnaire (SRQ). Results revealed that many of the expected differences in social support reactions by gender, ethnicity, and intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization status were not supported. However, this investigation found a gender difference in the emotional support response, where females provided (F (1, 290) = 13.11, p < .001, partial &#951;2 = .04) and received (F (1, 133) = 15.68, p < .001, partial &#951;2 = .11) higher emotional support more frequently than males. When social support was provided to IPV victims, support providers reacted with egocentric support responses more often (F (1, 122) = 9.53, p < .003, partial &#951;2 = .07) than when providing support for individuals not experiencing IPV. A comparison of Study 1 and Study 2 revealed that support providers (Study 2 participants) provided emotional support (F (1, 290) = 7.79, p < .05, partial &#951;2 = .03), treating differently (F (1, 290) = 9.51, p < .01, partial &#951;2 = .03), distraction (F (1, 290) = 10.09, p < .01, partial &#951;2 = .03), taking control (F (1, 290) = 21.56, p < .001, partial &#951;2 = .07), and tangible aid (F (1, 290) = 9.92, p < .01, partial &#951;2 = .03) more frequently than support recipients (Study 1 participants) received. Regarding helpfulness of support responses, one difference emerged whereby female friends who provided distraction responses were viewed as more helpful than male friends who distracted (F (1, 50) = 9.40, p < .01, partial &#951;2 = .16). This investigation suggests that gender, IPV victimization status, and type of participant (support provider, support recipient) are variables that impact social support during a conflict with a romantic partner. Measurement issues regarding the SRQ limited the ability to determine the helpfulness/harmfulness of social support reactions. Future research is necessary to continue to investigate the types of social support that are considered helpful when disclosing conflict with a partner.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctor of Philosophy
Level thesis:degree_level
Campus Only Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Psychology
Year
2011

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Marin, Kristen Marie
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Gilbert, Brenda

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/393
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:opensiuc.lib.siu.edu:dissertations-1393

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Southern Illinois University
Base URL
opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Marin, Kristen Marie. SOCIAL SUPPORT IN RELATION TO PARTNER CONFLICT AND PARTNER VIOLENCE: VIEWPOINTS OF SUPPORT RECIPIENTS AND SUPPORT PROVIDERS. Campus Only Dissertation thesis, 2011. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/393