The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze the perspectives of Pennsylvania school solicitors in Montgomery and Bucks Counties about how school officials should assess their regulatory authority of off-campus student online expression. With the rise in students online communication, the increasing and changing role of the school administrator, and the lack of a Supreme Court ruling on the matter, guidance and clarity for how school officials should proceed is blurry. Case law used as precedent to guide decision making has been inconsistent, with variations based on geographic region and the trends in that particular Circuit Court of Appeals.
I explore relevant case law, discuss social factors influencing the authority of school officials, analyze relevant scholarly research, and most importantly assess the perspectives of solicitors. Through qualitative interviews, school solicitors offered perspectives on their interpretations of legal trends, which precedents to apply, and what guiding questions to ask when determining the legal and professional responsibility of school officials to regulate off-campus expression.
I found that while there are many complicating factors that raise the level of responsibility for school officials’ involvement, the primary factors determining regulatory authority are the establishment of a nexus at the school and whether the expression results in substantial disruption to the on-campus educational environment.
","abstract_html":"<p>The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze the perspectives of Pennsylvania school solicitors in Montgomery and Bucks Counties about how school officials should assess their regulatory authority of off-campus student online expression. With the rise in students online communication, the increasing and changing role of the school administrator, and the lack of a Supreme Court ruling on the matter, guidance and clarity for how school officials should proceed is blurry. Case law used as precedent to guide decision making has been inconsistent, with variations based on geographic region and the trends in that particular Circuit Court of Appeals.</p> <p>I explore relevant case law, discuss social factors influencing the authority of school officials, analyze relevant scholarly research, and most importantly assess the perspectives of solicitors. Through qualitative interviews, school solicitors offered perspectives on their interpretations of legal trends, which precedents to apply, and what guiding questions to ask when determining the legal and professional responsibility of school officials to regulate off-campus expression.</p> <p>I found that while there are many complicating factors that raise the level of responsibility for school officials’ involvement, the primary factors determining regulatory authority are the establishment of a nexus at the school and whether the expression results in substantial disruption to the on-campus educational environment.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Eveslage, Scott Thomas"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"EdD Education Leadership, Management and Policy","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education Leadership, Management and Policy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Joseph Stetar, Ph.D.","Martin Finkelstein, Ph.D.","Anthony Stevenson, Ed.D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-11-12T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2015-11-12T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:33:15Z","subjects":["School Law","Policy","Student Expression","Cyberbullying","School Solicitors","Student Rights","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2129","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Joseph Stetar, Ph.D.","Martin Finkelstein, Ph.D.","Anthony Stevenson, Ed.D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Eveslage, Scott Thomas"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-01-26T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education Leadership, Management and Policy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["EdD Education Leadership, Management and Policy"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["School Law","Policy","Student Expression","Cyberbullying","School Solicitors","Student Rights","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2129"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze the perspectives of Pennsylvania school solicitors in Montgomery and Bucks Counties about how school officials should assess their regulatory authority of off-campus student online expression. With the rise in students online communication, the increasing and changing role of the school administrator, and the lack of a Supreme Court ruling on the matter, guidance and clarity for how school officials should proceed is blurry. Case law used as precedent to guide decision making has been inconsistent, with variations based on geographic region and the trends in that particular Circuit Court of Appeals.
I explore relevant case law, discuss social factors influencing the authority of school officials, analyze relevant scholarly research, and most importantly assess the perspectives of solicitors. Through qualitative interviews, school solicitors offered perspectives on their interpretations of legal trends, which precedents to apply, and what guiding questions to ask when determining the legal and professional responsibility of school officials to regulate off-campus expression.
I found that while there are many complicating factors that raise the level of responsibility for school officials’ involvement, the primary factors determining regulatory authority are the establishment of a nexus at the school and whether the expression results in substantial disruption to the on-campus educational environment.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Pennsylvania School Solicitors’ Guidance on How School Officials Should Respond when Regulating Off-Campus Student Expression"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Joseph Stetar, Ph.D.","Martin Finkelstein, Ph.D.","Anthony Stevenson, Ed.D."],"dc:creator":["Eveslage, Scott Thomas"],"dc:date.available":["2016-01-26T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze the perspectives of Pennsylvania school solicitors in Montgomery and Bucks Counties about how school officials should assess their regulatory authority of off-campus student online expression. With the rise in students online communication, the increasing and changing role of the school administrator, and the lack of a Supreme Court ruling on the matter, guidance and clarity for how school officials should proceed is blurry. Case law used as precedent to guide decision making has been inconsistent, with variations based on geographic region and the trends in that particular Circuit Court of Appeals.
I explore relevant case law, discuss social factors influencing the authority of school officials, analyze relevant scholarly research, and most importantly assess the perspectives of solicitors. Through qualitative interviews, school solicitors offered perspectives on their interpretations of legal trends, which precedents to apply, and what guiding questions to ask when determining the legal and professional responsibility of school officials to regulate off-campus expression.
I found that while there are many complicating factors that raise the level of responsibility for school officials’ involvement, the primary factors determining regulatory authority are the establishment of a nexus at the school and whether the expression results in substantial disruption to the on-campus educational environment.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2129"],"dc:subject":["School Law","Policy","Student Expression","Cyberbullying","School Solicitors","Student Rights","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership"],"dc:title":["Pennsylvania School Solicitors’ Guidance on How School Officials Should Respond when Regulating Off-Campus Student Expression"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education Leadership, Management and Policy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["EdD Education Leadership, Management and Policy"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:33:15Z"}