This study examined two rural Texas school district crisis teams’ evaluation of their level of preparedness for the event of a crisis. Eight research participants were evaluated using a qualitative exploratory case study design that was employed using a grounded theory while taking a pragmatic theoretical approach. The research questions included the following: (a) To what degree do district crisis team members agree that items on the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 (CCPC-2) are represented in the district crisis plan? (b) How does a school district crisis intervention team utilize the CCPC-2? (c) How does the CCPC-2 facilitate a discussion about the school district crisis intervention plan? (d) How are the results of the CCPC-2 used within the district in relation to the school district crisis intervention plan? It was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would demonstrate a strong level of interrater reliability agreement (.80 to .90). It was also hypothesized that the school district crisis intervention team would utilize the CCPC-2 results to amend inconsistencies amongst raters for a stronger Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) plan. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would foster and encourage communication amongst raters to develop a more thorough intervention plan that makes sense for the district and, at least in theory, would be more likely to be used effectively in the event of a crisis. Lastly, it was hypothesized that the results of the CCPC-2 would be used to create changes or additions in the district’s crisis intervention plan.
","abstract_html":"<p>This study examined two rural Texas school district crisis teams’ evaluation of their level of preparedness for the event of a crisis. Eight research participants were evaluated using a qualitative exploratory case study design that was employed using a grounded theory while taking a pragmatic theoretical approach. The research questions included the following: (a) To what degree do district crisis team members agree that items on the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 (CCPC-2) are represented in the district crisis plan? (b) How does a school district crisis intervention team utilize the CCPC-2? (c) How does the CCPC-2 facilitate a discussion about the school district crisis intervention plan? (d) How are the results of the CCPC-2 used within the district in relation to the school district crisis intervention plan? It was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would demonstrate a strong level of interrater reliability agreement (.80 to .90). It was also hypothesized that the school district crisis intervention team would utilize the CCPC-2 results to amend inconsistencies amongst raters for a stronger Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) plan. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would foster and encourage communication amongst raters to develop a more thorough intervention plan that makes sense for the district and, at least in theory, would be more likely to be used effectively in the event of a crisis. Lastly, it was hypothesized that the results of the CCPC-2 would be used to create changes or additions in the district’s crisis intervention plan.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Allen-Duran, Tiffany"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy - School Psychology","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Human Services","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Luis Aguerrevere, Ph.D.","Daniel McCleary, Ph.D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-08-05T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2023-08-05T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:45Z","subjects":["Texas rural school districts","Emergency Operation Plan","School Crisis Response","School Crisis Prevention","PREPaRE","Global Pandemics","School Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/509","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Luis Aguerrevere, Ph.D.","Daniel McCleary, Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Allen-Duran, Tiffany"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2028-07-27T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Human Services"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy - School Psychology"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Texas rural school districts","Emergency Operation Plan","School Crisis Response","School Crisis Prevention","PREPaRE","Global Pandemics","School Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/509"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study examined two rural Texas school district crisis teams’ evaluation of their level of preparedness for the event of a crisis. Eight research participants were evaluated using a qualitative exploratory case study design that was employed using a grounded theory while taking a pragmatic theoretical approach. The research questions included the following: (a) To what degree do district crisis team members agree that items on the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 (CCPC-2) are represented in the district crisis plan? (b) How does a school district crisis intervention team utilize the CCPC-2? (c) How does the CCPC-2 facilitate a discussion about the school district crisis intervention plan? (d) How are the results of the CCPC-2 used within the district in relation to the school district crisis intervention plan? It was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would demonstrate a strong level of interrater reliability agreement (.80 to .90). It was also hypothesized that the school district crisis intervention team would utilize the CCPC-2 results to amend inconsistencies amongst raters for a stronger Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) plan. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would foster and encourage communication amongst raters to develop a more thorough intervention plan that makes sense for the district and, at least in theory, would be more likely to be used effectively in the event of a crisis. Lastly, it was hypothesized that the results of the CCPC-2 would be used to create changes or additions in the district’s crisis intervention plan.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Impact of the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 on a District Crisis Plan"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Luis Aguerrevere, Ph.D.","Daniel McCleary, Ph.D."],"dc:creator":["Allen-Duran, Tiffany"],"dc:date.available":["2028-07-27T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study examined two rural Texas school district crisis teams’ evaluation of their level of preparedness for the event of a crisis. Eight research participants were evaluated using a qualitative exploratory case study design that was employed using a grounded theory while taking a pragmatic theoretical approach. The research questions included the following: (a) To what degree do district crisis team members agree that items on the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 (CCPC-2) are represented in the district crisis plan? (b) How does a school district crisis intervention team utilize the CCPC-2? (c) How does the CCPC-2 facilitate a discussion about the school district crisis intervention plan? (d) How are the results of the CCPC-2 used within the district in relation to the school district crisis intervention plan? It was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would demonstrate a strong level of interrater reliability agreement (.80 to .90). It was also hypothesized that the school district crisis intervention team would utilize the CCPC-2 results to amend inconsistencies amongst raters for a stronger Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) plan. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the CCPC-2 would foster and encourage communication amongst raters to develop a more thorough intervention plan that makes sense for the district and, at least in theory, would be more likely to be used effectively in the event of a crisis. Lastly, it was hypothesized that the results of the CCPC-2 would be used to create changes or additions in the district’s crisis intervention plan.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/509"],"dc:subject":["Texas rural school districts","Emergency Operation Plan","School Crisis Response","School Crisis Prevention","PREPaRE","Global Pandemics","School Psychology"],"dc:title":["The Impact of the Comprehensive Crisis Plan Checklist-2 on a District Crisis Plan"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Human Services"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy - School Psychology"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:45Z"}