{"id":{"repo_id":"sfasu","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.sfasu.edu:etds-1496"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sfasu/oai:scholarworks.sfasu.edu:etds-1496","repository":{"repo_id":"sfasu","name":"Stephen F. Austin State University","base_url":"https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Mock Jurors' Recommended Sentences for Perpetrators who have Traumatic Experiences","abstract":"<p>Experiencing trauma can result in neurological and biological changes, precipitating long-term damage to the brain and body. A considerable proportion of incarcerated persons have reported that they have experienced some type of trauma (Stensrud, Gilbride, & Bruinekool, 2018). Using scenarios of hypothetical crimes of varying degrees of seriousness, this study explores whether disclosure of the perpetrator’s traumatic childhood experiences has an influence on the severity of the sentence that mock jurors would recommend for that perpetrator. The mock jurors’ trait empathy, Belief in a Just World, and their own traumatic experiences were assessed to determine whether these characteristics could account for the variation in recommended sentences. No significant differences were found between the recommended sentences of perpetrators who experienced trauma and perpetrators who did not. However, participants’ optional, digitally written explanations of their rationale provided more insight into these dynamics and inspires opportunities for future research.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Experiencing trauma can result in neurological and biological changes, precipitating long-term damage to the brain and body. A considerable proportion of incarcerated persons have reported that they have experienced some type of trauma (Stensrud, Gilbride, &amp; Bruinekool, 2018). Using scenarios of hypothetical crimes of varying degrees of seriousness, this study explores whether disclosure of the perpetrator’s traumatic childhood experiences has an influence on the severity of the sentence that mock jurors would recommend for that perpetrator. The mock jurors’ trait empathy, Belief in a Just World, and their own traumatic experiences were assessed to determine whether these characteristics could account for the variation in recommended sentences. No significant differences were found between the recommended sentences of perpetrators who experienced trauma and perpetrators who did not. However, participants’ optional, digitally written explanations of their rationale provided more insight into these dynamics and inspires opportunities for future research.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["West, Katherine"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts - Psychology","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sylvia Middlebrook, Ph.D.","James Schaeffer, Ph.D.","Scott Drury, Ph.D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2022-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:37Z","subjects":["Mock jurors","Sentencing","Perceptions of Trauma","Criminology and Criminal Justice","Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/467","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sylvia Middlebrook, Ph.D.","James Schaeffer, Ph.D.","Scott Drury, Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["West, Katherine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-08-05T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts - Psychology"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Mock jurors","Sentencing","Perceptions of Trauma","Criminology and Criminal Justice","Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/467"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Experiencing trauma can result in neurological and biological changes, precipitating long-term damage to the brain and body. A considerable proportion of incarcerated persons have reported that they have experienced some type of trauma (Stensrud, Gilbride, & Bruinekool, 2018). Using scenarios of hypothetical crimes of varying degrees of seriousness, this study explores whether disclosure of the perpetrator’s traumatic childhood experiences has an influence on the severity of the sentence that mock jurors would recommend for that perpetrator. The mock jurors’ trait empathy, Belief in a Just World, and their own traumatic experiences were assessed to determine whether these characteristics could account for the variation in recommended sentences. No significant differences were found between the recommended sentences of perpetrators who experienced trauma and perpetrators who did not. However, participants’ optional, digitally written explanations of their rationale provided more insight into these dynamics and inspires opportunities for future research.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Mock Jurors' Recommended Sentences for Perpetrators who have Traumatic Experiences"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sylvia Middlebrook, Ph.D.","James Schaeffer, Ph.D.","Scott Drury, Ph.D."],"dc:creator":["West, Katherine"],"dc:date.available":["2022-08-05T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Experiencing trauma can result in neurological and biological changes, precipitating long-term damage to the brain and body. A considerable proportion of incarcerated persons have reported that they have experienced some type of trauma (Stensrud, Gilbride, & Bruinekool, 2018). Using scenarios of hypothetical crimes of varying degrees of seriousness, this study explores whether disclosure of the perpetrator’s traumatic childhood experiences has an influence on the severity of the sentence that mock jurors would recommend for that perpetrator. The mock jurors’ trait empathy, Belief in a Just World, and their own traumatic experiences were assessed to determine whether these characteristics could account for the variation in recommended sentences. No significant differences were found between the recommended sentences of perpetrators who experienced trauma and perpetrators who did not. However, participants’ optional, digitally written explanations of their rationale provided more insight into these dynamics and inspires opportunities for future research.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/467"],"dc:subject":["Mock jurors","Sentencing","Perceptions of Trauma","Criminology and Criminal Justice","Psychology"],"dc:title":["Mock Jurors' Recommended Sentences for Perpetrators who have Traumatic Experiences"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts - Psychology"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:37Z"}