{"id":{"repo_id":"sfasu","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.sfasu.edu:etds-1148"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sfasu/oai:scholarworks.sfasu.edu:etds-1148","repository":{"repo_id":"sfasu","name":"Stephen F. Austin State University","base_url":"https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"MONITORING SOFT-MAST PRODUCTION IN PINE WOODLAND RESTORATION AREAS ON THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST","abstract":"<p>The use of prescribed fire is integral to the restoration of open woodland habitats in the southeast, including shortleaf pine (<em>Pinus echinata</em>) woodlands in the Ouachita Mountains. Mature pine habitats maintained with recurrent disturbances have an open understory with a rich floristic diversity that provides quality habitat for many wildlife species, including the endemic and endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (<em>Picoides borealis</em>). Fire has many potential benefits for wildlife; however, the effects of fire on several important woody soft-mast producing species are not fully understood. Soft-mast quantity and quality is a key component in determining year-round habitat quality for several wildlife species such as eastern wild turkeys (<em>Meleagris gallopavo silvestris</em>) and black bears (<em>Ursus americanus</em>). A greater diversity of fruit-producing species provides a range of available fruit throughout the year due to variations in fruiting phenology, which is particularly important for soft-mast dependent wildlife. </p> <p>To better understand the implications of prescribed burning within the restored shortleaf pine woodlands, I examined soft-mast production at various time intervals after dormant season prescribed fire. I also determined the influence of different forest structural characteristics on soft-mast production. I inventoried 32 stands, representing four temporal periods after dormant season prescribed fires: 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons after a dormant season prescribed burn. I sampled stands by systemically establishing 40, 9 m<sup>2</sup> semi-permanent plots along randomly selected transects. To capture the majority of soft-mast producing species, I conducted surveys three times each growing season (June, July, and August). In July (during peak growing season), I visually estimated soft-mast vegetation coverage in 1 m<sup>2</sup> nested subplots (0.004 ha per stand), each placed within the larger soft-mast plots. At all plot locations, I measured forest structure characteristics, such as total basal area, canopy closure, aspect, and the number of previous burns. I quantified the total and individual species of soft-mast production and vegetation cover and compared these results by growing season. Lastly, I identified the plot, stand, and landscape level differences that had the greatest impact on soft-mast production.</p> <p>The number of species producing soft-mast increased with time since burn. Shrub (American beautyberry [<em>Callicarpa americana</em>]) and vine (grapes [<em>Vitis</em> spp.] and bramble [<em>Rubus</em> spp.]) species dominated soft-mast production as these species can establish and produce within 2 to 3 years after disturbance. In total, I detected a total of 14 species producing fruit, of these species 7 produced over 97% of the total production: American beautyberry, blackberry (<em>Rubus</em> spp.), summer grape (<em>V.aestivalis</em>), muscadine grape (<em>V. rotundifolia</em>), dewberry (<em>R.</em><em>flagellaris</em>), greenbrier (<em>Smilax</em> spp.), and sumac (<em>Rhus</em> spp.).I determined similar levels of soft-mast production in the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons post burn with production trends peaking in the 3<sup>rd</sup> season (18.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). Basal area and number of growing seasons since burn had the greatest influences and predictive value of individual species soft-mast production. These results indicate that soft-mast production was not inhibited within the 3 to 5-year dormant season fire return interval. Continuing to burn on this rotation will maximize and prolong soft-mast production and promote species diversity.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;The use of prescribed fire is integral to the restoration of open woodland habitats in the southeast, including shortleaf pine (&lt;em&gt;Pinus echinata&lt;/em&gt;) woodlands in the Ouachita Mountains. Mature pine habitats maintained with recurrent disturbances have an open understory with a rich floristic diversity that provides quality habitat for many wildlife species, including the endemic and endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (&lt;em&gt;Picoides borealis&lt;/em&gt;). Fire has many potential benefits for wildlife; however, the effects of fire on several important woody soft-mast producing species are not fully understood. Soft-mast quantity and quality is a key component in determining year-round habitat quality for several wildlife species such as eastern wild turkeys (&lt;em&gt;Meleagris gallopavo silvestris&lt;/em&gt;) and black bears (&lt;em&gt;Ursus americanus&lt;/em&gt;). A greater diversity of fruit-producing species provides a range of available fruit throughout the year due to variations in fruiting phenology, which is particularly important for soft-mast dependent wildlife. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To better understand the implications of prescribed burning within the restored shortleaf pine woodlands, I examined soft-mast production at various time intervals after dormant season prescribed fire. I also determined the influence of different forest structural characteristics on soft-mast production. I inventoried 32 stands, representing four temporal periods after dormant season prescribed fires: 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;, 2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt;, 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt;, and 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; growing seasons after a dormant season prescribed burn. I sampled stands by systemically establishing 40, 9 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; semi-permanent plots along randomly selected transects. To capture the majority of soft-mast producing species, I conducted surveys three times each growing season (June, July, and August). In July (during peak growing season), I visually estimated soft-mast vegetation coverage in 1 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; nested subplots (0.004 ha per stand), each placed within the larger soft-mast plots. At all plot locations, I measured forest structure characteristics, such as total basal area, canopy closure, aspect, and the number of previous burns. I quantified the total and individual species of soft-mast production and vegetation cover and compared these results by growing season. Lastly, I identified the plot, stand, and landscape level differences that had the greatest impact on soft-mast production.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The number of species producing soft-mast increased with time since burn. Shrub (American beautyberry [&lt;em&gt;Callicarpa americana&lt;/em&gt;]) and vine (grapes [&lt;em&gt;Vitis&lt;/em&gt; spp.] and bramble [&lt;em&gt;Rubus&lt;/em&gt; spp.]) species dominated soft-mast production as these species can establish and produce within 2 to 3 years after disturbance. In total, I detected a total of 14 species producing fruit, of these species 7 produced over 97% of the total production: American beautyberry, blackberry (&lt;em&gt;Rubus&lt;/em&gt; spp.), summer grape (&lt;em&gt;V.aestivalis&lt;/em&gt;), muscadine grape (&lt;em&gt;V. rotundifolia&lt;/em&gt;), dewberry (&lt;em&gt;R.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;flagellaris&lt;/em&gt;), greenbrier (&lt;em&gt;Smilax&lt;/em&gt; spp.), and sumac (&lt;em&gt;Rhus&lt;/em&gt; spp.).I determined similar levels of soft-mast production in the 2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt;, 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt;, and 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; growing seasons post burn with production trends peaking in the 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; season (18.2 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;). Basal area and number of growing seasons since burn had the greatest influences and predictive value of individual species soft-mast production. These results indicate that soft-mast production was not inhibited within the 3 to 5-year dormant season fire return interval. Continuing to burn on this rotation will maximize and prolong soft-mast production and promote species diversity.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wood, Tamara B."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science - Forestry","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Forestry","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Christopher E. Comer","Dr. Roger W. Perry","Dr. Brian P. Oswald"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-12-16T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-12-16T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:15Z","subjects":["prescribed fire","soft-mast production","shortleaf pine restoration","Ouachita National Forest","vegetation cover","soft-mast production after fire","Forest Biology","Forest Management","Plant Biology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/132","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Christopher E. Comer","Dr. Roger W. Perry","Dr. Brian P. Oswald"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wood, Tamara B."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-12-15T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Forestry"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science - Forestry"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["prescribed fire","soft-mast production","shortleaf pine restoration","Ouachita National Forest","vegetation cover","soft-mast production after fire","Forest Biology","Forest Management","Plant Biology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/132"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>The use of prescribed fire is integral to the restoration of open woodland habitats in the southeast, including shortleaf pine (<em>Pinus echinata</em>) woodlands in the Ouachita Mountains. Mature pine habitats maintained with recurrent disturbances have an open understory with a rich floristic diversity that provides quality habitat for many wildlife species, including the endemic and endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (<em>Picoides borealis</em>). Fire has many potential benefits for wildlife; however, the effects of fire on several important woody soft-mast producing species are not fully understood. Soft-mast quantity and quality is a key component in determining year-round habitat quality for several wildlife species such as eastern wild turkeys (<em>Meleagris gallopavo silvestris</em>) and black bears (<em>Ursus americanus</em>). A greater diversity of fruit-producing species provides a range of available fruit throughout the year due to variations in fruiting phenology, which is particularly important for soft-mast dependent wildlife. </p> <p>To better understand the implications of prescribed burning within the restored shortleaf pine woodlands, I examined soft-mast production at various time intervals after dormant season prescribed fire. I also determined the influence of different forest structural characteristics on soft-mast production. I inventoried 32 stands, representing four temporal periods after dormant season prescribed fires: 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons after a dormant season prescribed burn. I sampled stands by systemically establishing 40, 9 m<sup>2</sup> semi-permanent plots along randomly selected transects. To capture the majority of soft-mast producing species, I conducted surveys three times each growing season (June, July, and August). In July (during peak growing season), I visually estimated soft-mast vegetation coverage in 1 m<sup>2</sup> nested subplots (0.004 ha per stand), each placed within the larger soft-mast plots. At all plot locations, I measured forest structure characteristics, such as total basal area, canopy closure, aspect, and the number of previous burns. I quantified the total and individual species of soft-mast production and vegetation cover and compared these results by growing season. Lastly, I identified the plot, stand, and landscape level differences that had the greatest impact on soft-mast production.</p> <p>The number of species producing soft-mast increased with time since burn. Shrub (American beautyberry [<em>Callicarpa americana</em>]) and vine (grapes [<em>Vitis</em> spp.] and bramble [<em>Rubus</em> spp.]) species dominated soft-mast production as these species can establish and produce within 2 to 3 years after disturbance. In total, I detected a total of 14 species producing fruit, of these species 7 produced over 97% of the total production: American beautyberry, blackberry (<em>Rubus</em> spp.), summer grape (<em>V.aestivalis</em>), muscadine grape (<em>V. rotundifolia</em>), dewberry (<em>R.</em><em>flagellaris</em>), greenbrier (<em>Smilax</em> spp.), and sumac (<em>Rhus</em> spp.).I determined similar levels of soft-mast production in the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons post burn with production trends peaking in the 3<sup>rd</sup> season (18.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). Basal area and number of growing seasons since burn had the greatest influences and predictive value of individual species soft-mast production. These results indicate that soft-mast production was not inhibited within the 3 to 5-year dormant season fire return interval. Continuing to burn on this rotation will maximize and prolong soft-mast production and promote species diversity.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["MONITORING SOFT-MAST PRODUCTION IN PINE WOODLAND RESTORATION AREAS ON THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Christopher E. Comer","Dr. Roger W. Perry","Dr. Brian P. Oswald"],"dc:creator":["Wood, Tamara B."],"dc:date.available":["2017-12-15T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>The use of prescribed fire is integral to the restoration of open woodland habitats in the southeast, including shortleaf pine (<em>Pinus echinata</em>) woodlands in the Ouachita Mountains. Mature pine habitats maintained with recurrent disturbances have an open understory with a rich floristic diversity that provides quality habitat for many wildlife species, including the endemic and endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (<em>Picoides borealis</em>). Fire has many potential benefits for wildlife; however, the effects of fire on several important woody soft-mast producing species are not fully understood. Soft-mast quantity and quality is a key component in determining year-round habitat quality for several wildlife species such as eastern wild turkeys (<em>Meleagris gallopavo silvestris</em>) and black bears (<em>Ursus americanus</em>). A greater diversity of fruit-producing species provides a range of available fruit throughout the year due to variations in fruiting phenology, which is particularly important for soft-mast dependent wildlife. </p> <p>To better understand the implications of prescribed burning within the restored shortleaf pine woodlands, I examined soft-mast production at various time intervals after dormant season prescribed fire. I also determined the influence of different forest structural characteristics on soft-mast production. I inventoried 32 stands, representing four temporal periods after dormant season prescribed fires: 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons after a dormant season prescribed burn. I sampled stands by systemically establishing 40, 9 m<sup>2</sup> semi-permanent plots along randomly selected transects. To capture the majority of soft-mast producing species, I conducted surveys three times each growing season (June, July, and August). In July (during peak growing season), I visually estimated soft-mast vegetation coverage in 1 m<sup>2</sup> nested subplots (0.004 ha per stand), each placed within the larger soft-mast plots. At all plot locations, I measured forest structure characteristics, such as total basal area, canopy closure, aspect, and the number of previous burns. I quantified the total and individual species of soft-mast production and vegetation cover and compared these results by growing season. Lastly, I identified the plot, stand, and landscape level differences that had the greatest impact on soft-mast production.</p> <p>The number of species producing soft-mast increased with time since burn. Shrub (American beautyberry [<em>Callicarpa americana</em>]) and vine (grapes [<em>Vitis</em> spp.] and bramble [<em>Rubus</em> spp.]) species dominated soft-mast production as these species can establish and produce within 2 to 3 years after disturbance. In total, I detected a total of 14 species producing fruit, of these species 7 produced over 97% of the total production: American beautyberry, blackberry (<em>Rubus</em> spp.), summer grape (<em>V.aestivalis</em>), muscadine grape (<em>V. rotundifolia</em>), dewberry (<em>R.</em><em>flagellaris</em>), greenbrier (<em>Smilax</em> spp.), and sumac (<em>Rhus</em> spp.).I determined similar levels of soft-mast production in the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup> growing seasons post burn with production trends peaking in the 3<sup>rd</sup> season (18.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). Basal area and number of growing seasons since burn had the greatest influences and predictive value of individual species soft-mast production. These results indicate that soft-mast production was not inhibited within the 3 to 5-year dormant season fire return interval. Continuing to burn on this rotation will maximize and prolong soft-mast production and promote species diversity.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/132"],"dc:subject":["prescribed fire","soft-mast production","shortleaf pine restoration","Ouachita National Forest","vegetation cover","soft-mast production after fire","Forest Biology","Forest Management","Plant Biology"],"dc:title":["MONITORING SOFT-MAST PRODUCTION IN PINE WOODLAND RESTORATION AREAS ON THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Forestry"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science - Forestry"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:30:15Z"}