{"id":{"repo_id":"sdstate","oai_identifier":"oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-2397"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sdstate/oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-2397","repository":{"repo_id":"sdstate","name":"South Dakota State University","base_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Review of Road User Cost Methods and Methodology","abstract":"<p>This study was designed to review state-of-the-practice road user cost (RUC) calculations, evaluate current SDDOT methodology, propose improvements and implement them in a new analysis worksheet for use by SDDOT. This report includes an extensive literature review and the results of targeted surveys for regional state DOTs with regard to RUC methodologies, a comparison between current SDDOT methodology and proposed measures and resources, a sensitivity analysis of proposed changes, and development of the SD-RUC tool, an Excel spreadsheet-based application. Two RUC modules were developed (project planning and project construction), with methodology comprised of three components. The RUC components include vehicle operating costs (VOC), value of road users’ time (VOT), and accident costs (AC). The evaluation of RUC in these capacities included a sensitivity analysis of incremental changes to unit costs in these components as well as case studies to determine the changes in user costs due to the new methodology.The results of the analysis indicated that the differences between the current methodology and the proposed methodology can be attributed to changes in unit cost, changes to methodology, and the inclusion of AC. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the contributions of RUC components in the project planning and project construction analysis can be ranked differently. The difference is attributed to the selection of unit costs which include both vehicle operating and ownership costs for the project planning purposes and only vehicle operating costs for project construction purposes, resulting in a higher value for planning VOC. The proposed methods address the diversity and complexity of different planning and work zone scenarios, improve the consistency and accuracy of RUC estimation, and are implemented through an Excel based worksheet.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;This study was designed to review state-of-the-practice road user cost (RUC) calculations, evaluate current SDDOT methodology, propose improvements and implement them in a new analysis worksheet for use by SDDOT. This report includes an extensive literature review and the results of targeted surveys for regional state DOTs with regard to RUC methodologies, a comparison between current SDDOT methodology and proposed measures and resources, a sensitivity analysis of proposed changes, and development of the SD-RUC tool, an Excel spreadsheet-based application. Two RUC modules were developed (project planning and project construction), with methodology comprised of three components. The RUC components include vehicle operating costs (VOC), value of road users’ time (VOT), and accident costs (AC). The evaluation of RUC in these capacities included a sensitivity analysis of incremental changes to unit costs in these components as well as case studies to determine the changes in user costs due to the new methodology.The results of the analysis indicated that the differences between the current methodology and the proposed methodology can be attributed to changes in unit cost, changes to methodology, and the inclusion of AC. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the contributions of RUC components in the project planning and project construction analysis can be ranked differently. The difference is attributed to the selection of unit costs which include both vehicle operating and ownership costs for the project planning purposes and only vehicle operating costs for project construction purposes, resulting in a higher value for planning VOC. The proposed methods address the diversity and complexity of different planning and work zone scenarios, improve the consistency and accuracy of RUC estimation, and are implemented through an Excel based worksheet.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cutler, Chase E."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis - University Access Only","degree_discipline":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Xiao Qin"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:29:08Z","subjects":["Transportation Engineering"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["<p>In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted<br /><a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/</a></p>"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1391","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Xiao Qin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cutler, Chase E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-07-31T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis - University Access Only"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Transportation Engineering"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["<p>In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted<br /><a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/</a></p>"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1391"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>This study was designed to review state-of-the-practice road user cost (RUC) calculations, evaluate current SDDOT methodology, propose improvements and implement them in a new analysis worksheet for use by SDDOT. This report includes an extensive literature review and the results of targeted surveys for regional state DOTs with regard to RUC methodologies, a comparison between current SDDOT methodology and proposed measures and resources, a sensitivity analysis of proposed changes, and development of the SD-RUC tool, an Excel spreadsheet-based application. Two RUC modules were developed (project planning and project construction), with methodology comprised of three components. The RUC components include vehicle operating costs (VOC), value of road users’ time (VOT), and accident costs (AC). The evaluation of RUC in these capacities included a sensitivity analysis of incremental changes to unit costs in these components as well as case studies to determine the changes in user costs due to the new methodology.The results of the analysis indicated that the differences between the current methodology and the proposed methodology can be attributed to changes in unit cost, changes to methodology, and the inclusion of AC. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the contributions of RUC components in the project planning and project construction analysis can be ranked differently. The difference is attributed to the selection of unit costs which include both vehicle operating and ownership costs for the project planning purposes and only vehicle operating costs for project construction purposes, resulting in a higher value for planning VOC. The proposed methods address the diversity and complexity of different planning and work zone scenarios, improve the consistency and accuracy of RUC estimation, and are implemented through an Excel based worksheet.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Review of Road User Cost Methods and Methodology"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Xiao Qin"],"dc:creator":["Cutler, Chase E."],"dc:date.available":["2017-07-31T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>This study was designed to review state-of-the-practice road user cost (RUC) calculations, evaluate current SDDOT methodology, propose improvements and implement them in a new analysis worksheet for use by SDDOT. This report includes an extensive literature review and the results of targeted surveys for regional state DOTs with regard to RUC methodologies, a comparison between current SDDOT methodology and proposed measures and resources, a sensitivity analysis of proposed changes, and development of the SD-RUC tool, an Excel spreadsheet-based application. Two RUC modules were developed (project planning and project construction), with methodology comprised of three components. The RUC components include vehicle operating costs (VOC), value of road users’ time (VOT), and accident costs (AC). The evaluation of RUC in these capacities included a sensitivity analysis of incremental changes to unit costs in these components as well as case studies to determine the changes in user costs due to the new methodology.The results of the analysis indicated that the differences between the current methodology and the proposed methodology can be attributed to changes in unit cost, changes to methodology, and the inclusion of AC. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the contributions of RUC components in the project planning and project construction analysis can be ranked differently. The difference is attributed to the selection of unit costs which include both vehicle operating and ownership costs for the project planning purposes and only vehicle operating costs for project construction purposes, resulting in a higher value for planning VOC. The proposed methods address the diversity and complexity of different planning and work zone scenarios, improve the consistency and accuracy of RUC estimation, and are implemented through an Excel based worksheet.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1391"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["<p>In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted<br /><a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/</a></p>"],"dc:subject":["Transportation Engineering"],"dc:title":["A Review of Road User Cost Methods and Methodology"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis - University Access Only"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:29:08Z"}