{"id":{"repo_id":"sdstate","oai_identifier":"oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-2038"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sdstate/oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-2038","repository":{"repo_id":"sdstate","name":"South Dakota State University","base_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Morphologic and Transcriptomic Response to Weed Pressure in Multiple Maize (Zea mays L.) Selections and Teosinte (Zea mays L. ssp parviglumis) Lines","abstract":"<p>Sweet corn <em>(Zea mays</em> L. convar.<em> saccharata</em> var. <em>rugosa</em>) and modern dent variants (field maize, <em>Zea mays</em> L. <em>indentata</em>) have varying degrees of weed tolerance (ability to maintain yield under weed stress). Maize retains ~30% of its ancestral teosinte’s (<em>Zea mays</em> ssp<em> parviglumis</em>) genetic base. Transcriptomic response to weed pressure in maize and teosinte can lead to manipulation of the maize genome to minimize crop yield loss due to weed presence. In maize and teosinte under weed-free and weedstressed conditions, the objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate transcriptomic responses of 2 teosinte lines; 2) to evaluate transcriptomic response in 5 maize selections in 4 different growing seasons; 3) to determine if mid-season growth parameters (chlorophyll, height, stem diameter, leaf area, or biomass) correlate with crop tolerance; and, 4) to compare and contrast transcriptomic responses among maize and teosinte selections. Four maize selections and 2 teosinte lines suffered grain yield (maize) or harvest biomass (teosinte) loss due to weed stress ranging from 13-44%. Each evaluated selection had a unique response to weeds, with 3 gene ontologies (jasmonic acid response/signaling, UDP-glucosyl and glucuronyltransferases, and quercetin glucosyltransferase) common to all selections evaluated. These common ontologies were not directly related to light depravation or quality, nutrient depravation, nor water stress, which were expected to be the primary mechanisms in weed response. This research suggests individual maize and teosinte selections have distinctive responses to weed stress.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Sweet corn &lt;em&gt;(Zea mays&lt;/em&gt; L. convar.&lt;em&gt; saccharata&lt;/em&gt; var. &lt;em&gt;rugosa&lt;/em&gt;) and modern dent variants (field maize, &lt;em&gt;Zea mays&lt;/em&gt; L. &lt;em&gt;indentata&lt;/em&gt;) have varying degrees of weed tolerance (ability to maintain yield under weed stress). Maize retains ~30% of its ancestral teosinte’s (&lt;em&gt;Zea mays&lt;/em&gt; ssp&lt;em&gt; parviglumis&lt;/em&gt;) genetic base. Transcriptomic response to weed pressure in maize and teosinte can lead to manipulation of the maize genome to minimize crop yield loss due to weed presence. In maize and teosinte under weed-free and weedstressed conditions, the objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate transcriptomic responses of 2 teosinte lines; 2) to evaluate transcriptomic response in 5 maize selections in 4 different growing seasons; 3) to determine if mid-season growth parameters (chlorophyll, height, stem diameter, leaf area, or biomass) correlate with crop tolerance; and, 4) to compare and contrast transcriptomic responses among maize and teosinte selections. Four maize selections and 2 teosinte lines suffered grain yield (maize) or harvest biomass (teosinte) loss due to weed stress ranging from 13-44%. Each evaluated selection had a unique response to weeds, with 3 gene ontologies (jasmonic acid response/signaling, UDP-glucosyl and glucuronyltransferases, and quercetin glucosyltransferase) common to all selections evaluated. These common ontologies were not directly related to light depravation or quality, nutrient depravation, nor water stress, which were expected to be the primary mechanisms in weed response. This research suggests individual maize and teosinte selections have distinctive responses to weed stress.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bruggeman, Stephanie A."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Thesis - Open Access","degree_discipline":"Plant Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sharon Clay"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2016-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:28:30Z","subjects":["maize","response","teosinte","transcriptomic","weed","Plant Sciences","Weed Science"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1038","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sharon Clay"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bruggeman, Stephanie A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-08-16T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Plant Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis - Open Access"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["maize","response","teosinte","transcriptomic","weed","Plant Sciences","Weed Science"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1038"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Sweet corn <em>(Zea mays</em> L. convar.<em> saccharata</em> var. <em>rugosa</em>) and modern dent variants (field maize, <em>Zea mays</em> L. <em>indentata</em>) have varying degrees of weed tolerance (ability to maintain yield under weed stress). Maize retains ~30% of its ancestral teosinte’s (<em>Zea mays</em> ssp<em> parviglumis</em>) genetic base. Transcriptomic response to weed pressure in maize and teosinte can lead to manipulation of the maize genome to minimize crop yield loss due to weed presence. In maize and teosinte under weed-free and weedstressed conditions, the objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate transcriptomic responses of 2 teosinte lines; 2) to evaluate transcriptomic response in 5 maize selections in 4 different growing seasons; 3) to determine if mid-season growth parameters (chlorophyll, height, stem diameter, leaf area, or biomass) correlate with crop tolerance; and, 4) to compare and contrast transcriptomic responses among maize and teosinte selections. Four maize selections and 2 teosinte lines suffered grain yield (maize) or harvest biomass (teosinte) loss due to weed stress ranging from 13-44%. Each evaluated selection had a unique response to weeds, with 3 gene ontologies (jasmonic acid response/signaling, UDP-glucosyl and glucuronyltransferases, and quercetin glucosyltransferase) common to all selections evaluated. These common ontologies were not directly related to light depravation or quality, nutrient depravation, nor water stress, which were expected to be the primary mechanisms in weed response. This research suggests individual maize and teosinte selections have distinctive responses to weed stress.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Morphologic and Transcriptomic Response to Weed Pressure in Multiple Maize (Zea mays L.) Selections and Teosinte (Zea mays L. ssp parviglumis) Lines"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sharon Clay"],"dc:creator":["Bruggeman, Stephanie A."],"dc:date.available":["2017-08-16T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Sweet corn <em>(Zea mays</em> L. convar.<em> saccharata</em> var. <em>rugosa</em>) and modern dent variants (field maize, <em>Zea mays</em> L. <em>indentata</em>) have varying degrees of weed tolerance (ability to maintain yield under weed stress). Maize retains ~30% of its ancestral teosinte’s (<em>Zea mays</em> ssp<em> parviglumis</em>) genetic base. Transcriptomic response to weed pressure in maize and teosinte can lead to manipulation of the maize genome to minimize crop yield loss due to weed presence. In maize and teosinte under weed-free and weedstressed conditions, the objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate transcriptomic responses of 2 teosinte lines; 2) to evaluate transcriptomic response in 5 maize selections in 4 different growing seasons; 3) to determine if mid-season growth parameters (chlorophyll, height, stem diameter, leaf area, or biomass) correlate with crop tolerance; and, 4) to compare and contrast transcriptomic responses among maize and teosinte selections. Four maize selections and 2 teosinte lines suffered grain yield (maize) or harvest biomass (teosinte) loss due to weed stress ranging from 13-44%. Each evaluated selection had a unique response to weeds, with 3 gene ontologies (jasmonic acid response/signaling, UDP-glucosyl and glucuronyltransferases, and quercetin glucosyltransferase) common to all selections evaluated. These common ontologies were not directly related to light depravation or quality, nutrient depravation, nor water stress, which were expected to be the primary mechanisms in weed response. This research suggests individual maize and teosinte selections have distinctive responses to weed stress.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1038"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["maize","response","teosinte","transcriptomic","weed","Plant Sciences","Weed Science"],"dc:title":["Morphologic and Transcriptomic Response to Weed Pressure in Multiple Maize (Zea mays L.) Selections and Teosinte (Zea mays L. ssp parviglumis) Lines"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Plant Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis - Open Access"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:28:30Z"}