{"id":{"repo_id":"sdstate","oai_identifier":"oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-1575"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sdstate/oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-1575","repository":{"repo_id":"sdstate","name":"South Dakota State University","base_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Use of Natural Vegetative Barriers to Limit Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Town Expansion in Western South Dakota","abstract":"Prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control has historically consisted of lethal methods to maintain, reduce, or eliminate populations. Non-lethal methods of control for prairie dogs are desired to meet changing management objectives. Use of naturally occurring buffer strips as vegetative barriers may be effective in limiting prairie dog town expansion. Objectives of this study were to evaluate effective width of vegetative barriers in limiting prairie dog town expansion, document characteristics of natural vegetation that affect expansion of prairie dog towns, and examine vegetation characteristics associated with prairie dog towns in western South Dakota. Five study sites were established in western South Dakota on rangelands containing prairie dog towns of adequate size (! 10 ha). Electric fences were constructed to exclude cattle and create buffer strips of naturally occurring grasses and shrubs. Buffer strips were 100 m long and 10, 25, and 40 m wide. Zero meter controls were included on all study sites. Prairie dogs were poisoned to create prairie dog free buffer zones within control areas. Grazing was allowed on both sides of buffer strips. When grazing pressure was not sufficient, mowing was used to simulate grazing. To quantify vegetation characteristics, quadrats (25) were randomly distributed throughout buffer strips. Evaluation of study sites included visual obstruction (VOR), vegetation cover (%), vegetation frequency, vegetation height, and vegetation identification. Burrow density adjacent to buffers was quantified as an index to prairie dog population. Barrier penetration was evaluated by presence of new active burrows behind vegetative barriers (Breakthrough). Breakthrough was minimized with 40-cm vegetation height and 10-cm VOR. The predictive model for vegetation height and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.410-0.004*Veg Height-0.036*Buffer Width). The predictive model for VOR and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.48-0.048*VOR-0.031*Buffer Width). Percent grass cover, percent forb cover, percent bare ground, percent litter cover, and burrow density did not add significantly to the model. Models were used to predict buffer width needed to prevent breakthroughs. Estimated buffer width to minimize breakthroughs ranged from 85.1 – 103.1 m. Vegetation characteristics indicated that visual obstruction was greater on buffers than on controls. Vegetation height was higher on treatment than control plots, and higher on eastern sites than western sites. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) was greater on eastern than western site. Bare ground was significantly greater on control areas compared to buffer areas. Vegetation characteristics associated with relative percent grass cover, forb cover, and litter indicated minor or no differences between controls and buffer, and eastern sites and western sites. Plant species richness was not different from control to buffer area, but was greater on eastern sites than western sites.","abstract_html":"Prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control has historically consisted of lethal methods to maintain, reduce, or eliminate populations. Non-lethal methods of control for prairie dogs are desired to meet changing management objectives. Use of naturally occurring buffer strips as vegetative barriers may be effective in limiting prairie dog town expansion. Objectives of this study were to evaluate effective width of vegetative barriers in limiting prairie dog town expansion, document characteristics of natural vegetation that affect expansion of prairie dog towns, and examine vegetation characteristics associated with prairie dog towns in western South Dakota. Five study sites were established in western South Dakota on rangelands containing prairie dog towns of adequate size (! 10 ha). Electric fences were constructed to exclude cattle and create buffer strips of naturally occurring grasses and shrubs. Buffer strips were 100 m long and 10, 25, and 40 m wide. Zero meter controls were included on all study sites. Prairie dogs were poisoned to create prairie dog free buffer zones within control areas. Grazing was allowed on both sides of buffer strips. When grazing pressure was not sufficient, mowing was used to simulate grazing. To quantify vegetation characteristics, quadrats (25) were randomly distributed throughout buffer strips. Evaluation of study sites included visual obstruction (VOR), vegetation cover (%), vegetation frequency, vegetation height, and vegetation identification. Burrow density adjacent to buffers was quantified as an index to prairie dog population. Barrier penetration was evaluated by presence of new active burrows behind vegetative barriers (Breakthrough). Breakthrough was minimized with 40-cm vegetation height and 10-cm VOR. The predictive model for vegetation height and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.410-0.004*Veg Height-0.036*Buffer Width). The predictive model for VOR and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.48-0.048*VOR-0.031*Buffer Width). Percent grass cover, percent forb cover, percent bare ground, percent litter cover, and burrow density did not add significantly to the model. Models were used to predict buffer width needed to prevent breakthroughs. Estimated buffer width to minimize breakthroughs ranged from 85.1 – 103.1 m. Vegetation characteristics indicated that visual obstruction was greater on buffers than on controls. Vegetation height was higher on treatment than control plots, and higher on eastern sites than western sites. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) was greater on eastern than western site. Bare ground was significantly greater on control areas compared to buffer areas. Vegetation characteristics associated with relative percent grass cover, forb cover, and litter indicated minor or no differences between controls and buffer, and eastern sites and western sites. Plant species richness was not different from control to buffer area, but was greater on eastern sites than western sites.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Terrall, David F."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis - University Access Only","degree_discipline":"Wildlife and Fisheries Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Jonathan A. Jenks"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2006,"date_issued":"2006-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2006-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:28:04Z","subjects":["Natural Resources and Conservation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright © 2006 David F. Terrall. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/575","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Jonathan A. Jenks"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Terrall, David F."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Wildlife and Fisheries Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis - University Access Only"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Natural Resources and Conservation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright © 2006 David F. Terrall. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/575"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control has historically consisted of lethal methods to maintain, reduce, or eliminate populations. Non-lethal methods of control for prairie dogs are desired to meet changing management objectives. Use of naturally occurring buffer strips as vegetative barriers may be effective in limiting prairie dog town expansion. Objectives of this study were to evaluate effective width of vegetative barriers in limiting prairie dog town expansion, document characteristics of natural vegetation that affect expansion of prairie dog towns, and examine vegetation characteristics associated with prairie dog towns in western South Dakota. Five study sites were established in western South Dakota on rangelands containing prairie dog towns of adequate size (! 10 ha). Electric fences were constructed to exclude cattle and create buffer strips of naturally occurring grasses and shrubs. Buffer strips were 100 m long and 10, 25, and 40 m wide. Zero meter controls were included on all study sites. Prairie dogs were poisoned to create prairie dog free buffer zones within control areas. Grazing was allowed on both sides of buffer strips. When grazing pressure was not sufficient, mowing was used to simulate grazing. To quantify vegetation characteristics, quadrats (25) were randomly distributed throughout buffer strips. Evaluation of study sites included visual obstruction (VOR), vegetation cover (%), vegetation frequency, vegetation height, and vegetation identification. Burrow density adjacent to buffers was quantified as an index to prairie dog population. Barrier penetration was evaluated by presence of new active burrows behind vegetative barriers (Breakthrough). Breakthrough was minimized with 40-cm vegetation height and 10-cm VOR. The predictive model for vegetation height and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.410-0.004*Veg Height-0.036*Buffer Width). The predictive model for VOR and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.48-0.048*VOR-0.031*Buffer Width). Percent grass cover, percent forb cover, percent bare ground, percent litter cover, and burrow density did not add significantly to the model. Models were used to predict buffer width needed to prevent breakthroughs. Estimated buffer width to minimize breakthroughs ranged from 85.1 – 103.1 m. Vegetation characteristics indicated that visual obstruction was greater on buffers than on controls. Vegetation height was higher on treatment than control plots, and higher on eastern sites than western sites. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) was greater on eastern than western site. Bare ground was significantly greater on control areas compared to buffer areas. Vegetation characteristics associated with relative percent grass cover, forb cover, and litter indicated minor or no differences between controls and buffer, and eastern sites and western sites. Plant species richness was not different from control to buffer area, but was greater on eastern sites than western sites."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Use of Natural Vegetative Barriers to Limit Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Town Expansion in Western South Dakota"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Jonathan A. Jenks"],"dc:creator":["Terrall, David F."],"dc:description.abstract":["Prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control has historically consisted of lethal methods to maintain, reduce, or eliminate populations. Non-lethal methods of control for prairie dogs are desired to meet changing management objectives. Use of naturally occurring buffer strips as vegetative barriers may be effective in limiting prairie dog town expansion. Objectives of this study were to evaluate effective width of vegetative barriers in limiting prairie dog town expansion, document characteristics of natural vegetation that affect expansion of prairie dog towns, and examine vegetation characteristics associated with prairie dog towns in western South Dakota. Five study sites were established in western South Dakota on rangelands containing prairie dog towns of adequate size (! 10 ha). Electric fences were constructed to exclude cattle and create buffer strips of naturally occurring grasses and shrubs. Buffer strips were 100 m long and 10, 25, and 40 m wide. Zero meter controls were included on all study sites. Prairie dogs were poisoned to create prairie dog free buffer zones within control areas. Grazing was allowed on both sides of buffer strips. When grazing pressure was not sufficient, mowing was used to simulate grazing. To quantify vegetation characteristics, quadrats (25) were randomly distributed throughout buffer strips. Evaluation of study sites included visual obstruction (VOR), vegetation cover (%), vegetation frequency, vegetation height, and vegetation identification. Burrow density adjacent to buffers was quantified as an index to prairie dog population. Barrier penetration was evaluated by presence of new active burrows behind vegetative barriers (Breakthrough). Breakthrough was minimized with 40-cm vegetation height and 10-cm VOR. The predictive model for vegetation height and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.410-0.004*Veg Height-0.036*Buffer Width). The predictive model for VOR and buffer width was Breakthrough=exp (2.48-0.048*VOR-0.031*Buffer Width). Percent grass cover, percent forb cover, percent bare ground, percent litter cover, and burrow density did not add significantly to the model. Models were used to predict buffer width needed to prevent breakthroughs. Estimated buffer width to minimize breakthroughs ranged from 85.1 – 103.1 m. Vegetation characteristics indicated that visual obstruction was greater on buffers than on controls. Vegetation height was higher on treatment than control plots, and higher on eastern sites than western sites. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) was greater on eastern than western site. Bare ground was significantly greater on control areas compared to buffer areas. Vegetation characteristics associated with relative percent grass cover, forb cover, and litter indicated minor or no differences between controls and buffer, and eastern sites and western sites. Plant species richness was not different from control to buffer area, but was greater on eastern sites than western sites."],"dc:identifier":["https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/575"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright © 2006 David F. Terrall. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Natural Resources and Conservation"],"dc:title":["Use of Natural Vegetative Barriers to Limit Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Town Expansion in Western South Dakota"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Wildlife and Fisheries Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis - University Access Only"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:28:04Z"}