Back to results

South Dakota State University

Avian Nesting Densities and Success in Introduced Cool-Season Grass-Legume Plantings Versus Warm-Season Native Grass Planting in South Dakota 2002-2003

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Agriculture has changed the prairie landscape of the Midwest and Great Plains. As a result populations of many grassland bird species have declined. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) has restored more than 14 million hectares of prairie and idle grassland. Studies indicate that warm-season native grass plantings (WSN) generally provide good winter cover. Recently a trend favoring WSN has emerged, but limited information exists on nesting density and success of cool-season grass-legume plantings (dense nesting cover [DNC]) versus WSN. Fields of DNC and WSN were selected in pairs (< 1-km apart) and 10% of each field’s area was searched for avian nests. Within each pair, field age and size were kept as similar as possible. Precipitation in 2002 was below the 30-year average and in 2003 approached the 30-year average. Early in the season of 2002, ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) nest densities were higher in DNC than WSN, and as the 2002 nesting season progressed, dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) and red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) nest densities were higher in DNC than WSN. In 2003, no differences in nest densities were detected for any species. Passerine nest numbers were insufficient to statistically analyze. Results indicate that avian nesting density in DNC is at least equal to or greater than that in WSN. Nest success was not different between field-types for either year. Other studies noted that monotypic stands of certain grass species were generally of little value to wildlife, and that vegetative species diversity and vegetative lateral cover was probably a key component of avian use during the nesting season. My results indicate that cool-season grasses with a legume component (promoting lateral cover [structural diversity]) may attract nesting birds during dry springs. Therefore, structurally diverse plantings of DNC may be beneficial as nesting cover during dry springs, whereas WSN plantings may be as attractive as DNC to nesting birds during wet springs. Native prairie contains both cool- and warm-season grasses and legumes. Currently it is difficult and expensive to obtain native cool-season grass and legume seed. Making both cover types available on the landscape may be the best strategy, rather than favoring either type for management. A mixture of the two could be planted and evaluated on an experimental basis.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science (MS)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis - University Access Only
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Wildlife and Fisheries Science
Year
2004

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Rohlfing, Mark B.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Daniel E. Hubbard

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright © 2004 Mark B. Rohlfing. All rights reserved.
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/380
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:openprairie.sdstate.edu:etd-1380

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
South Dakota State University
Base URL
openprairie.sdstate.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Rohlfing, Mark B.. Avian Nesting Densities and Success in Introduced Cool-Season Grass-Legume Plantings Versus Warm-Season Native Grass Planting in South Dakota 2002-2003. Thesis - University Access Only thesis, 2004. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/380