The Impact of Open Theism on C. Peter Wagner's Philosophy of Discipleship
type: CreativeWork
description: This dissertation demonstrates that Wagner’s philosophy of discipleship emerged from a theological basis established in open theism, affirming God’s limited foreknowledge and omnipotence while denying his immutability. Moreover, an underlying consequentialist ethic drove Wagner’s understanding and praxes of the Great Commission. Wagner’s telos sought to create disciples by any means necessary so that God could instill his will upon the earth. This research introduces three new terms to articulate Wagner’s theological convictions and praxes: divine interventional mutability, cooperationism, and commissional pragmatic consequentialism. The present chapter introduces the need for the research. Chapter 2 serves as an excursus on the history and culture of American evangelicalism (1900–1930) and the early developmental years (1930–1952) of C. Peter Wagner. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 articulate Wagner’s primary theological dispositions concerning the doctrine of God throughout his career (1952–2016). Chapter 6 provides the research conclusions and articulates the implications of Wagnerian theology on discipleship praxes and ethics. Wagner’s early theological writings demonstrated minimal parity with open theism, though some functional similarities existed. His early philosophy of discipleship emphasized individual means by the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit through theological education. As Wagner progressed through life and no longer held to the traditional primary tenets of American fundamentalism, his theological writings aligned with open theism. Wagner’s theological basis evolved into a pragmatic means of discipleship, affirming God’s dependency upon the prayers of humanity. In 2001, Wagner formally adopted open theism and articulated a revised means of discipleship through Dominion theology, marginalizing theological education and doctrine. In conclusion, within the context of Wagner’s scriptural narrative, his philosophy of discipleship manifests as a means to impleme…
abstract: This dissertation demonstrates that Wagner’s philosophy of discipleship emerged from a theological basis established in open theism, affirming God’s limited foreknowledge and omnipotence while denying his immutability. Moreover, an underlying consequentialist ethic drove Wagner’s understanding and praxes of the Great Commission. Wagner’s telos sought to create disciples by any means necessary so that God could instill his will upon the earth. This research introduces three new terms to articulate Wagner’s theological convictions and praxes: divine interventional mutability, cooperationism, and commissional pragmatic consequentialism. The present chapter introduces the need for the research. Chapter 2 serves as an excursus on the history and culture of American evangelicalism (1900–1930) and the early developmental years (1930–1952) of C. Peter Wagner. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 articulate Wagner’s primary theological dispositions concerning the doctrine of God throughout his career (1952–2016). Chapter 6 provides the research conclusions and articulates the implications of Wagnerian theology on discipleship praxes and ethics. Wagner’s early theological writings demonstrated minimal parity with open theism, though some functional similarities existed. His early philosophy of discipleship emphasized individual means by the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit through theological education. As Wagner progressed through life and no longer held to the traditional primary tenets of American fundamentalism, his theological writings aligned with open theism. Wagner’s theological basis evolved into a pragmatic means of discipleship, affirming God’s dependency upon the prayers of humanity. In 2001, Wagner formally adopted open theism and articulated a revised means of discipleship through Dominion theology, marginalizing theological education and doctrine. In conclusion, within the context of Wagner’s scriptural narrative, his philosophy of discipleship manifests as a means to impleme…
author: Pietsch, Evan Phillip
language: en_US
date published: 2023-12
date modified: 2026-07-27T21:06:20Z
provider: Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

PropertyValue
property ID: Handle
value: https://hdl.handle.net/10392/7219