Back to results

Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

Darwin, Design, and Dysteleology: A Critical Evaluation of William Dembski and Francisco Ayala on the Problem of Suboptimal Design

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This dissertation is a critical evaluation of two modern thinkers debating the idea of intelligent design (ID), William Dembski and Francisco Ayala. Specifically, it focuses on Ayala's major theological critique of intelligent design, namely, the problem of dysteleology. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the problem of dysteleology as it relates to biology and offers a methodology for evaluating each thinker’s resolution to this problem. Chapter 2 examines Ayala's scientific critique of ID, and chapter 3 looks at Ayala's theological critique of ID. Chapter 4 summarizes Dembski's method for detecting design, and chapter 5 outlines Dembski's critiques of naturalism and materialism as well as his information-theoretic account of reality. Finally, chapter 6 analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of Ayala’s proposal that Darwin is a gift to theology in light of Dembski’s information-theoretic account of reality.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Year dc:date.issued
2017

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Berhow, Michael Caryl
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Cabal, Theodore J.

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10392/5330
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:repository.sbts.edu:10392/5330

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Base URL
repository.sbts.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Berhow, Michael Caryl. Darwin, Design, and Dysteleology: A Critical Evaluation of William Dembski and Francisco Ayala on the Problem of Suboptimal Design. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10392/5330