{"id":{"repo_id":"sbts","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.sbts.edu:10392/3823"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sbts/oai:repository.sbts.edu:10392/3823","repository":{"repo_id":"sbts","name":"Southern Baptist Theological Seminary","base_url":"https://repository.sbts.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A Case for the Traditional Translation and Interpretation of Genesis 1:1 Based upon a Multi-Leveled Linguistic Analysis","abstract":"This dissertation examines the linguistic issues related to the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. Chapter 1 introduces the necessity for this study, explaining the theological implications that pertain to the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. Chapter 2 offers a history of the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. It covers most of the major historical eras, beginning with the period of the Old Testament and ending with the period of the Reformation. Chapter 3 analyzes the three linguistic levels related to the translation of Genesis 1: 1 : the lexical, grammatical, and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether the word n~t.;i~'J:;l is in the absolute or construct state. Chapter 4 analyzes the two linguistic levels related to the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1: the lexical (O:~~/rj~ and ij1n/ij1:l) and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether or not there is semantic continuity between Genesis 1: 1 and 1:2. Chapter 5 summarizes the linguistic data related to both the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1, explaining again the implications for creatio ex nihilo. This dissertation contends that the traditional translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1 are the most faithful to the principles of Classical-Hebrew linguistics.","abstract_html":"This dissertation examines the linguistic issues related to the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. Chapter 1 introduces the necessity for this study, explaining the theological implications that pertain to the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. Chapter 2 offers a history of the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. It covers most of the major historical eras, beginning with the period of the Old Testament and ending with the period of the Reformation. Chapter 3 analyzes the three linguistic levels related to the translation of Genesis 1: 1 : the lexical, grammatical, and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether the word n~t.;i~'J:;l is in the absolute or construct state. Chapter 4 analyzes the two linguistic levels related to the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1: the lexical (O:~~/rj~ and ij1n/ij1:l) and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether or not there is semantic continuity between Genesis 1: 1 and 1:2. Chapter 5 summarizes the linguistic data related to both the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1, explaining again the implications for creatio ex nihilo. This dissertation contends that the traditional translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1 are the most faithful to the principles of Classical-Hebrew linguistics.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wilson, Joshua"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Fuller, Russell T."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-12","date_published":"2010-12","updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10392/3823","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://repository.sbts.edu/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Arepository.sbts.edu%3A10392%2F3823","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Fuller, Russell T."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wilson, Joshua"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2012-02-06T16:19:53Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2012-02-06T16:19:53Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010-12"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10392/3823"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation examines the linguistic issues related to the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. Chapter 1 introduces the necessity for this study, explaining the theological implications that pertain to the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. Chapter 2 offers a history of the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. It covers most of the major historical eras, beginning with the period of the Old Testament and ending with the period of the Reformation. Chapter 3 analyzes the three linguistic levels related to the translation of Genesis 1: 1 : the lexical, grammatical, and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether the word n~t.;i~'J:;l is in the absolute or construct state. Chapter 4 analyzes the two linguistic levels related to the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1: the lexical (O:~~/rj~ and ij1n/ij1:l) and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether or not there is semantic continuity between Genesis 1: 1 and 1:2. Chapter 5 summarizes the linguistic data related to both the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1, explaining again the implications for creatio ex nihilo. This dissertation contends that the traditional translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1 are the most faithful to the principles of Classical-Hebrew linguistics."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Case for the Traditional Translation and Interpretation of Genesis 1:1 Based upon a Multi-Leveled Linguistic Analysis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Fuller, Russell T."],"dc:creator":["Wilson, Joshua"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2012-02-06T16:19:53Z"],"dc:date.available":["2012-02-06T16:19:53Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation examines the linguistic issues related to the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. Chapter 1 introduces the necessity for this study, explaining the theological implications that pertain to the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. Chapter 2 offers a history of the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1. It covers most of the major historical eras, beginning with the period of the Old Testament and ending with the period of the Reformation. Chapter 3 analyzes the three linguistic levels related to the translation of Genesis 1: 1 : the lexical, grammatical, and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether the word n~t.;i~'J:;l is in the absolute or construct state. Chapter 4 analyzes the two linguistic levels related to the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1: the lexical (O:~~/rj~ and ij1n/ij1:l) and syntactical levels. The central issue of this chapter is whether or not there is semantic continuity between Genesis 1: 1 and 1:2. Chapter 5 summarizes the linguistic data related to both the translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1, explaining again the implications for creatio ex nihilo. This dissertation contends that the traditional translation and interpretation of Genesis 1: 1 are the most faithful to the principles of Classical-Hebrew linguistics."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10392/3823"],"dc:title":["A Case for the Traditional Translation and Interpretation of Genesis 1:1 Based upon a Multi-Leveled Linguistic Analysis"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z"}