{"id":{"repo_id":"sask","oai_identifier":"oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/etd-09222010-095647"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sask/oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/etd-09222010-095647","repository":{"repo_id":"sask","name":"University of Saskatchewan","base_url":"https://harvest.usask.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Identity and modality","abstract":"In 1970, Saul Kripke gave the watershed lectures that is Naming and Necessity. One of his claims, which had far reaching implications, was that all identities are necessary. Despite his wide influence, many worries remained. This essay explores two of the most popular worries with Kripke&apos;s project: Quine&apos;s objection of referential opacity and the problems of transworld identification. I hope to show that both of these worries are merely worries, and the air of serious objection they both carry can be dispelled.","abstract_html":"In 1970, Saul Kripke gave the watershed lectures that is Naming and Necessity. One of his claims, which had far reaching implications, was that all identities are necessary. Despite his wide influence, many worries remained. This essay explores two of the most popular worries with Kripke&amp;apos;s project: Quine&amp;apos;s objection of referential opacity and the problems of transworld identification. I hope to show that both of these worries are merely worries, and the air of serious objection they both carry can be dispelled.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Chung, Kenneth Kin Hung"],"institution":"University of Saskatchewan","degree_name":"Master of Arts (M.A.)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pfeifer, Karl"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2002,"date_issued":"2002","date_published":"2002","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:27:04Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-09222010-095647","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pfeifer, Karl"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Chung, Kenneth Kin Hung"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2010-09-22T09:56:47Z","2013-01-04T04:59:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-09-27T08:00:00Z","2013-01-04T04:59:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2002"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Saskatchewan"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-09222010-095647"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In 1970, Saul Kripke gave the watershed lectures that is Naming and Necessity. One of his claims, which had far reaching implications, was that all identities are necessary. Despite his wide influence, many worries remained. This essay explores two of the most popular worries with Kripke&apos;s project: Quine&apos;s objection of referential opacity and the problems of transworld identification. I hope to show that both of these worries are merely worries, and the air of serious objection they both carry can be dispelled."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Identity and modality"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pfeifer, Karl"],"dc:creator":["Chung, Kenneth Kin Hung"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2010-09-22T09:56:47Z","2013-01-04T04:59:43Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-09-27T08:00:00Z","2013-01-04T04:59:43Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2002"],"dc:description.abstract":["In 1970, Saul Kripke gave the watershed lectures that is Naming and Necessity. One of his claims, which had far reaching implications, was that all identities are necessary. Despite his wide influence, many worries remained. This essay explores two of the most popular worries with Kripke&apos;s project: Quine&apos;s objection of referential opacity and the problems of transworld identification. I hope to show that both of these worries are merely worries, and the air of serious objection they both carry can be dispelled."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-09222010-095647"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:title":["Identity and modality"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Saskatchewan"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:27:04Z"}