{"id":{"repo_id":"sask","oai_identifier":"oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/ETD-2015-02-1980"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sask/oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/ETD-2015-02-1980","repository":{"repo_id":"sask","name":"University of Saskatchewan","base_url":"https://harvest.usask.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE & COMPLEX SOVEREIGNTY: USING THE PATHWAYS FRAMEWORK TO EXPLAIN DOMESTIC POLICY OUTCOMES","abstract":"The precautionary principle has emerged as one of the most contentious international norms within international environmental law. Yet, despite the vexing conceptual uncertainties confronting the precautionary principle, it is repeatedly invoked by policy makers and incorporated within international and domestic environmental law and agreements. This thesis explores how the international norm of precaution comes to be translated from the international sphere to domestic public policy. The research utilizes the pathways framework, which suggests that there are three additional pathways in additional to the direct implementation of international rules in national law and policy - international norms and discourse, markets and direct access - through which actors, institutions and interests can influence domestic and firm-level policy change. The findings propose an explanation of why Canada came to adopt a particular version of the precautionary principle, also revealing the complex nature of norm transfer, the significance of multiple causal pathways of influence and the interactions arising along these pathways.","abstract_html":"The precautionary principle has emerged as one of the most contentious international norms within international environmental law. Yet, despite the vexing conceptual uncertainties confronting the precautionary principle, it is repeatedly invoked by policy makers and incorporated within international and domestic environmental law and agreements. This thesis explores how the international norm of precaution comes to be translated from the international sphere to domestic public policy. The research utilizes the pathways framework, which suggests that there are three additional pathways in additional to the direct implementation of international rules in national law and policy - international norms and discourse, markets and direct access - through which actors, institutions and interests can influence domestic and firm-level policy change. The findings propose an explanation of why Canada came to adopt a particular version of the precautionary principle, also revealing the complex nature of norm transfer, the significance of multiple causal pathways of influence and the interactions arising along these pathways.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Noble, Wainewright"],"institution":"University of Saskatchewan","degree_name":"Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Public Policy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Rayner, Professor Jeremy"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Phillips, Distinguished Professor Peter","Phillipson, Professor Martin","Fulton, Professor Murray"],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-05-01","date_published":"2015-05-01","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:26:59Z","subjects":["Precautionary Principle","Biotechnology","Pathways Framework","Domestic Politics","Causal Pathways of Influence"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2015-02-1980","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Rayner, Professor Jeremy"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Phillips, Distinguished Professor Peter","Phillipson, Professor Martin","Fulton, Professor Murray"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Noble, Wainewright"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-05-02T12:00:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-05-02T12:00:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015-05-01"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Public Policy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Saskatchewan"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Precautionary Principle","Biotechnology","Pathways Framework","Domestic Politics","Causal Pathways of Influence"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2015-02-1980"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The precautionary principle has emerged as one of the most contentious international norms within international environmental law. Yet, despite the vexing conceptual uncertainties confronting the precautionary principle, it is repeatedly invoked by policy makers and incorporated within international and domestic environmental law and agreements. This thesis explores how the international norm of precaution comes to be translated from the international sphere to domestic public policy. The research utilizes the pathways framework, which suggests that there are three additional pathways in additional to the direct implementation of international rules in national law and policy - international norms and discourse, markets and direct access - through which actors, institutions and interests can influence domestic and firm-level policy change. The findings propose an explanation of why Canada came to adopt a particular version of the precautionary principle, also revealing the complex nature of norm transfer, the significance of multiple causal pathways of influence and the interactions arising along these pathways."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE & COMPLEX SOVEREIGNTY: USING THE PATHWAYS FRAMEWORK TO EXPLAIN DOMESTIC POLICY OUTCOMES"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Rayner, Professor Jeremy"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Phillips, Distinguished Professor Peter","Phillipson, Professor Martin","Fulton, Professor Murray"],"dc:creator":["Noble, Wainewright"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-05-02T12:00:16Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-05-02T12:00:16Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015-05-01"],"dc:description.abstract":["The precautionary principle has emerged as one of the most contentious international norms within international environmental law. Yet, despite the vexing conceptual uncertainties confronting the precautionary principle, it is repeatedly invoked by policy makers and incorporated within international and domestic environmental law and agreements. This thesis explores how the international norm of precaution comes to be translated from the international sphere to domestic public policy. The research utilizes the pathways framework, which suggests that there are three additional pathways in additional to the direct implementation of international rules in national law and policy - international norms and discourse, markets and direct access - through which actors, institutions and interests can influence domestic and firm-level policy change. The findings propose an explanation of why Canada came to adopt a particular version of the precautionary principle, also revealing the complex nature of norm transfer, the significance of multiple causal pathways of influence and the interactions arising along these pathways."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2015-02-1980"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Precautionary Principle","Biotechnology","Pathways Framework","Domestic Politics","Causal Pathways of Influence"],"dc:title":["THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE & COMPLEX SOVEREIGNTY: USING THE PATHWAYS FRAMEWORK TO EXPLAIN DOMESTIC POLICY OUTCOMES"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Public Policy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Saskatchewan"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:26:59Z"}