{"id":{"repo_id":"sask","oai_identifier":"oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/18244"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/sask/oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/18244","repository":{"repo_id":"sask","name":"University of Saskatchewan","base_url":"https://harvest.usask.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"AN EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SUCCESS IN COURT ANNEXED MEDIATION IN SASKATCHEWAN","abstract":"This thesis proposes an evaluation of court annexed mediation in Saskatchewan through Canada’s evolving access to justice framework, arguing that traditional measures such as settlement rates, user satisfaction, and docket efficiency provide an incomplete picture of mediation’s justice impact. Drawing on the Access to Justice Measurement Framework (A2JMF), the research proposes a people centred evaluative approach that prioritizes population level access, user experience, and long term outcomes. The analysis traces the historical and legislative development of mediation in Saskatchewan, revealing a strong institutional foundation but limited mechanisms for systematic, equity oriented evaluation. Empirical research demonstrates broad acceptance of mediation among litigants, lawyers, and judges, yet also highlights persistent concerns regarding power imbalances, inconsistent data collection, and the absence of oversight regarding the fairness and durability of mediated agreements. The thesis concludes that Saskatchewan’s mediation system, while well established, requires rigorous, access to justice-based evaluation to ensure that it functions not merely as an efficiency tool but as a genuinely equitable and responsive component of the province’s civil justice system.","abstract_html":"This thesis proposes an evaluation of court annexed mediation in Saskatchewan through Canada’s evolving access to justice framework, arguing that traditional measures such as settlement rates, user satisfaction, and docket efficiency provide an incomplete picture of mediation’s justice impact. Drawing on the Access to Justice Measurement Framework (A2JMF), the research proposes a people centred evaluative approach that prioritizes population level access, user experience, and long term outcomes. The analysis traces the historical and legislative development of mediation in Saskatchewan, revealing a strong institutional foundation but limited mechanisms for systematic, equity oriented evaluation. Empirical research demonstrates broad acceptance of mediation among litigants, lawyers, and judges, yet also highlights persistent concerns regarding power imbalances, inconsistent data collection, and the absence of oversight regarding the fairness and durability of mediated agreements. The thesis concludes that Saskatchewan’s mediation system, while well established, requires rigorous, access to justice-based evaluation to ensure that it functions not merely as an efficiency tool but as a genuinely equitable and responsive component of the province’s civil justice system.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ole Ibiam, Oledi"],"institution":"University of Saskatchewan","degree_name":"Master of Laws (LL.M.)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Law","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Michaela, Keet","Heavin, Heather"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Surtees, Doug","Buer, Sarah"],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-04-14","date_published":"2026-04-14","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:26:49Z","subjects":["Court-annexed mediation, Saskatchewan, Evaluative Framework, success of court annexed mediation, mediation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10388/18244","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Michaela, Keet","Heavin, Heather"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Surtees, Doug","Buer, Sarah"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ole Ibiam, Oledi"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-04-14T18:19:03Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-04-14T18:19:03Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2026-04-14"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Law"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Laws (LL.M.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Saskatchewan"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Court-annexed mediation, Saskatchewan, Evaluative Framework, success of court annexed mediation, mediation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/18244"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis proposes an evaluation of court annexed mediation in Saskatchewan through Canada’s evolving access to justice framework, arguing that traditional measures such as settlement rates, user satisfaction, and docket efficiency provide an incomplete picture of mediation’s justice impact. Drawing on the Access to Justice Measurement Framework (A2JMF), the research proposes a people centred evaluative approach that prioritizes population level access, user experience, and long term outcomes. The analysis traces the historical and legislative development of mediation in Saskatchewan, revealing a strong institutional foundation but limited mechanisms for systematic, equity oriented evaluation. Empirical research demonstrates broad acceptance of mediation among litigants, lawyers, and judges, yet also highlights persistent concerns regarding power imbalances, inconsistent data collection, and the absence of oversight regarding the fairness and durability of mediated agreements. The thesis concludes that Saskatchewan’s mediation system, while well established, requires rigorous, access to justice-based evaluation to ensure that it functions not merely as an efficiency tool but as a genuinely equitable and responsive component of the province’s civil justice system."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["AN EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SUCCESS IN COURT ANNEXED MEDIATION IN SASKATCHEWAN"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Michaela, Keet","Heavin, Heather"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Surtees, Doug","Buer, Sarah"],"dc:creator":["Ole Ibiam, Oledi"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-04-14T18:19:03Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-04-14T18:19:03Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2026-04-14"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis proposes an evaluation of court annexed mediation in Saskatchewan through Canada’s evolving access to justice framework, arguing that traditional measures such as settlement rates, user satisfaction, and docket efficiency provide an incomplete picture of mediation’s justice impact. Drawing on the Access to Justice Measurement Framework (A2JMF), the research proposes a people centred evaluative approach that prioritizes population level access, user experience, and long term outcomes. The analysis traces the historical and legislative development of mediation in Saskatchewan, revealing a strong institutional foundation but limited mechanisms for systematic, equity oriented evaluation. Empirical research demonstrates broad acceptance of mediation among litigants, lawyers, and judges, yet also highlights persistent concerns regarding power imbalances, inconsistent data collection, and the absence of oversight regarding the fairness and durability of mediated agreements. The thesis concludes that Saskatchewan’s mediation system, while well established, requires rigorous, access to justice-based evaluation to ensure that it functions not merely as an efficiency tool but as a genuinely equitable and responsive component of the province’s civil justice system."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10388/18244"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:subject":["Court-annexed mediation, Saskatchewan, Evaluative Framework, success of court annexed mediation, mediation"],"dc:title":["AN EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SUCCESS IN COURT ANNEXED MEDIATION IN SASKATCHEWAN"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Law"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Laws (LL.M.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Saskatchewan"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:26:49Z"}