{"id":{"repo_id":"rowan","oai_identifier":"oai:rdw.rowan.edu:etd-1216"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/rowan/oai:rdw.rowan.edu:etd-1216","repository":{"repo_id":"rowan","name":"Rowan University","base_url":"https://rdw.rowan.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A comparison of attention bias paradigms related to insomnia","abstract":"Attentional bias to sleep related stimuli by poor sleepers has been reported as a factor in initiating and maintaining sleep disturbance. In this study, three paradigms (Flicker, Posner, and Stroop) were used in comparison to further investigate the role of attentional biases in Primary Insomnia. Participants (n=117) were split into good sleepers and poor sleepers using a median split with the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS). Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as the covariate, two-way mixed modality ANCOVAs were conducted for each paradigm revealing no significant differences in word type, quality of sleep, or the interaction of these variables. Using only the poor sleepers, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the paradigms to each other revealing no significant difference in how attentional bias is measured by them. There does not seem to be a relationship to sleep distress and attentional bias in the current sample. The findings may suggest a difference in the perception of sleep distress for the college population.","abstract_html":"Attentional bias to sleep related stimuli by poor sleepers has been reported as a factor in initiating and maintaining sleep disturbance. In this study, three paradigms (Flicker, Posner, and Stroop) were used in comparison to further investigate the role of attentional biases in Primary Insomnia. Participants (n=117) were split into good sleepers and poor sleepers using a median split with the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS). Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as the covariate, two-way mixed modality ANCOVAs were conducted for each paradigm revealing no significant differences in word type, quality of sleep, or the interaction of these variables. Using only the poor sleepers, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the paradigms to each other revealing no significant difference in how attentional bias is measured by them. There does not seem to be a relationship to sleep distress and attentional bias in the current sample. The findings may suggest a difference in the perception of sleep distress for the college population.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Maloney, Nathaniel"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Angelone, Bonnie"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-09-18T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-09-18T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:13:03Z","subjects":["Insomnia","Psychiatric and Mental Health"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/217","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Angelone, Bonnie"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Maloney, Nathaniel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-03-03T19:58:49Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Insomnia","Psychiatric and Mental Health"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/217"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Attentional bias to sleep related stimuli by poor sleepers has been reported as a factor in initiating and maintaining sleep disturbance. In this study, three paradigms (Flicker, Posner, and Stroop) were used in comparison to further investigate the role of attentional biases in Primary Insomnia. Participants (n=117) were split into good sleepers and poor sleepers using a median split with the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS). Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as the covariate, two-way mixed modality ANCOVAs were conducted for each paradigm revealing no significant differences in word type, quality of sleep, or the interaction of these variables. Using only the poor sleepers, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the paradigms to each other revealing no significant difference in how attentional bias is measured by them. There does not seem to be a relationship to sleep distress and attentional bias in the current sample. The findings may suggest a difference in the perception of sleep distress for the college population."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A comparison of attention bias paradigms related to insomnia"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Angelone, Bonnie"],"dc:creator":["Maloney, Nathaniel"],"dc:date.available":["2020-03-03T19:58:49Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Attentional bias to sleep related stimuli by poor sleepers has been reported as a factor in initiating and maintaining sleep disturbance. In this study, three paradigms (Flicker, Posner, and Stroop) were used in comparison to further investigate the role of attentional biases in Primary Insomnia. Participants (n=117) were split into good sleepers and poor sleepers using a median split with the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS). Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as the covariate, two-way mixed modality ANCOVAs were conducted for each paradigm revealing no significant differences in word type, quality of sleep, or the interaction of these variables. Using only the poor sleepers, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the paradigms to each other revealing no significant difference in how attentional bias is measured by them. There does not seem to be a relationship to sleep distress and attentional bias in the current sample. The findings may suggest a difference in the perception of sleep distress for the college population."],"dc:identifier":["https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/217"],"dc:subject":["Insomnia","Psychiatric and Mental Health"],"dc:title":["A comparison of attention bias paradigms related to insomnia"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:13:03Z"}