{"id":{"repo_id":"rowan","oai_identifier":"oai:rdw.rowan.edu:etd-1047"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/rowan/oai:rdw.rowan.edu:etd-1047","repository":{"repo_id":"rowan","name":"Rowan University","base_url":"https://rdw.rowan.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdict: psychiatry versus psychology","abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdicts. We, further, assessed whether there would be a difference in the relative influence of MDs and PhD expert witnesses. Undergraduate and graduate students served as mock jurors and were presented with an insanity case which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and a MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. After analysis of verdicts, an Insanity Defense Attitudes Survey, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated no bias toward MD's, except for the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Implications for other case factors that combine to affect jurors' verdicts are discussed.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdicts. We, further, assessed whether there would be a difference in the relative influence of MDs and PhD expert witnesses. Undergraduate and graduate students served as mock jurors and were presented with an insanity case which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and a MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. After analysis of verdicts, an Insanity Defense Attitudes Survey, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated no bias toward MD's, except for the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Implications for other case factors that combine to affect jurors' verdicts are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gandy-Smith, La Shonine"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Gaer, Eleanor"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-10-28T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-10-28T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:12:49Z","subjects":["Evidence, Expert; Verdicts","Psychiatric and Mental Health"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/48","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Gaer, Eleanor"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gandy-Smith, La Shonine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-03-03T19:58:34Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Evidence, Expert; Verdicts","Psychiatric and Mental Health"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/48"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdicts. We, further, assessed whether there would be a difference in the relative influence of MDs and PhD expert witnesses. Undergraduate and graduate students served as mock jurors and were presented with an insanity case which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and a MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. After analysis of verdicts, an Insanity Defense Attitudes Survey, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated no bias toward MD's, except for the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Implications for other case factors that combine to affect jurors' verdicts are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdict: psychiatry versus psychology"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Gaer, Eleanor"],"dc:creator":["Gandy-Smith, La Shonine"],"dc:date.available":["2020-03-03T19:58:34Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdicts. We, further, assessed whether there would be a difference in the relative influence of MDs and PhD expert witnesses. Undergraduate and graduate students served as mock jurors and were presented with an insanity case which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and a MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. After analysis of verdicts, an Insanity Defense Attitudes Survey, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated no bias toward MD's, except for the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Implications for other case factors that combine to affect jurors' verdicts are discussed."],"dc:identifier":["https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/48"],"dc:subject":["Evidence, Expert; Verdicts","Psychiatric and Mental Health"],"dc:title":["The effects of expert witness testimony on juror verdict: psychiatry versus psychology"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A. Applied Psychology and Professional Mental Health Counseling"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:12:49Z"}