{"id":{"repo_id":"rosario","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18896"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/rosario/oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18896","repository":{"repo_id":"rosario","name":"Universidad del Rosario","base_url":"https://repository.urosario.edu.co/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Comparación de las medidas y proporciones faciales con cánones neoclásicos, en estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario","abstract":"Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de un grupo de 287 estudiantes (hombres y mujeres) de la Universidad del Rosario, con edades entre los 18 y 30 años. Se tomaron fotografías frontal, lateral izquierdo, derecho y de la base nasal con un método estandarizado, con el fin de describir las proporciones faciales perfilométricas en contraste con los cánones neoclásicos. Se tomaron como referencia puntos perfilométricos anatómicos faciales que permitieron comparar las medidas con los derivados de las proporciones faciales ideales. Las medidas se realizaron con el Software “Golden Ratio”. Resultados: Se obtuvo al tercio facial inferior como el de mayor tamaño tanto en la vista frontal como en las laterales, siendo esta característica una constante en hombres y mujeres, también se encontró que los hombres presentan caras de mayor longitud con respecto a las mujeres. La longitud de la oreja es superior a la longitud nasal tanto en hombres como en mujeres; la distancia intercantal es mayor al ancho de la base nasal con una razón aproximada de 1.2cm. Con respecto a los ángulos, se encontrò gran variabilidad con respecto a los estandarizado en el triàngulo de Powell, y en la parte auricular, un ángulo de protrusión auricular mayor al valor estándar. Conclusión: Estos resultados nos permiten facilitar los análisis perfilométricos prequirúrgicos en especialidades afines a la otorrinolaringología y cirugía plástica facial en la población Colombiana, aportando además rangos de medidas propias o autóctonas al análisis forense y ciencias relacionadas.","abstract_html":"Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de un grupo de 287 estudiantes (hombres y mujeres) de la Universidad del Rosario, con edades entre los 18 y 30 años. Se tomaron fotografías frontal, lateral izquierdo, derecho y de la base nasal con un método estandarizado, con el fin de describir las proporciones faciales perfilométricas en contraste con los cánones neoclásicos. Se tomaron como referencia puntos perfilométricos anatómicos faciales que permitieron comparar las medidas con los derivados de las proporciones faciales ideales. Las medidas se realizaron con el Software “Golden Ratio”. Resultados: Se obtuvo al tercio facial inferior como el de mayor tamaño tanto en la vista frontal como en las laterales, siendo esta característica una constante en hombres y mujeres, también se encontró que los hombres presentan caras de mayor longitud con respecto a las mujeres. La longitud de la oreja es superior a la longitud nasal tanto en hombres como en mujeres; la distancia intercantal es mayor al ancho de la base nasal con una razón aproximada de 1.2cm. Con respecto a los ángulos, se encontrò gran variabilidad con respecto a los estandarizado en el triàngulo de Powell, y en la parte auricular, un ángulo de protrusión auricular mayor al valor estándar. Conclusión: Estos resultados nos permiten facilitar los análisis perfilométricos prequirúrgicos en especialidades afines a la otorrinolaringología y cirugía plástica facial en la población Colombiana, aportando además rangos de medidas propias o autóctonas al análisis forense y ciencias relacionadas.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Posada Alvarez, Mary Eugenia","Corredor Zuluaga, Diego Andrés","Buitrago Medina, Daniel Alejandro"],"institution":"Universidad del Rosario","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-01-16","date_published":"2019-01-16","updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:46:59Z","subjects":["Estético","Asimetría facial","Cosmética","Cirugía plástica","Antropometría","Belleza","Antropología física","Esthetics","Facial asymmetry","Cosmetics","Surgery","Plastic","Anthropometry","Beauty","Fisonomía","Cara"],"languages":["spa"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"rights_urls":["http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896","href":"http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18896","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Posada Alvarez, Mary Eugenia","Corredor Zuluaga, Diego Andrés","Buitrago Medina, Daniel Alejandro"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-01-16","2019-01-21T17:53:58Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universidad del Rosario","Facultad de medicina","Especialización en Otorrinolaringología"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Estético","Asimetría facial","Cosmética","Cirugía plástica","Antropometría","Belleza","Antropología física","Esthetics","Facial asymmetry","Cosmetics","Surgery","Plastic","Anthropometry","Beauty","Fisonomía","Cara"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["spa"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18896","http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de un grupo de 287 estudiantes (hombres y mujeres) de la Universidad del Rosario, con edades entre los 18 y 30 años. Se tomaron fotografías frontal, lateral izquierdo, derecho y de la base nasal con un método estandarizado, con el fin de describir las proporciones faciales perfilométricas en contraste con los cánones neoclásicos. Se tomaron como referencia puntos perfilométricos anatómicos faciales que permitieron comparar las medidas con los derivados de las proporciones faciales ideales. Las medidas se realizaron con el Software “Golden Ratio”. Resultados: Se obtuvo al tercio facial inferior como el de mayor tamaño tanto en la vista frontal como en las laterales, siendo esta característica una constante en hombres y mujeres, también se encontró que los hombres presentan caras de mayor longitud con respecto a las mujeres. La longitud de la oreja es superior a la longitud nasal tanto en hombres como en mujeres; la distancia intercantal es mayor al ancho de la base nasal con una razón aproximada de 1.2cm. Con respecto a los ángulos, se encontrò gran variabilidad con respecto a los estandarizado en el triàngulo de Powell, y en la parte auricular, un ángulo de protrusión auricular mayor al valor estándar. Conclusión: Estos resultados nos permiten facilitar los análisis perfilométricos prequirúrgicos en especialidades afines a la otorrinolaringología y cirugía plástica facial en la población Colombiana, aportando además rangos de medidas propias o autóctonas al análisis forense y ciencias relacionadas.","Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of a group of 287 students (men and women) of the Universidad del Rosario, aged between 18 and 30 years. Frontal, left lateral, right and nasal base photographs were taken with a standardized method, in order to describe the profileometric proportions in contrast to the neoclassical canons. Facial anatomic profileometric points were taken as a reference that allowed to compare the measurements with those derived from the ideal facial proportions. The measurements were made with the Golden Ratio Software. Results: The lower facial third was obtained as the largest size in both the frontal and lateral views, this characteristic being a constant in men and women, it was also found that men have longer faces with respect to women. The length of the ear is greater than the nasal length in both men and women; the intercanthal distance is greater than the width of the nasal base with an approximate ratio of 1. 2cm. With respect to the angles, great variability was found with respect to the standardized ones in the Powell triangle, and in the atrial part, an angle of atrial protrusion greater than the standard value. Conclusion: These results allow us to facilitate pre-surgical pprofileometric analysis in specialties related to otorhinolaryngology and facial plastic surgery in the Colombian population, also providing ranges of own or autochthonous measures to forensic analysis and related sciences.","2021-01-22 01:01:02: Script de automatizacion de embargos. info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-01-21","lunes 21/01/2019 2:10 p. m. Hemos realizado la publicación de su documento, el cual puede consultar en el siguiente enlace: http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896Usted escogió la opción “Bloqueado (Texto referencial)”, por lo que el documento ha quedado con acceso bloqueado temporalmente hasta el 21 de enero de 2021 en concordancia con las Políticas de Acceso Abierto de la Universidad. Si usted desea al finalizar este tiempo puede volver a solicitar el embargo por otro nuevo periodo.Tenga en cuenta que los documentos en acceso abierto propician una mayor visibilidad de su producción académica."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["1. Dayan S. What is beauty, and why do we care so much about it? Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;1(13):66–7.","2. Dhir K. Zonal Analysis of Facial Asymmetry and Its Clinical Significance in Facial Plastic Surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;15(2):110.","3. Fang F, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):874–81.","4. Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina-Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J, et al. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman’s face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Nov;63(11):1825–31.","5. Bashour M. History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3):741–56.","6. Meneghini F. Clinical Facial Analysis. Heidelberg GS, editor. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005.","7. Naini F. Leonardo da Vinci’s Aesthetic Analysis of Nasal Tip Prominence. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(6):463–4.","8. Navarro C, Villanueva J. Proporciones del equilibrio facial. El acondicionamiento seguro y sencillo de supraestructuras de implante. Quitessence técnica. 2011;22(2):1–95.","9. Johnston VS, Solomon CJ, Gibson SJ, Pallares-bejarano A. Human . Current theories and MethodologiesFacial Beauty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2013;5:371–7.","10. Biller JA, Kim DW. A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):91–7.","11. Gautam G, Shashikalakumari V, Garg G. Facial attractiveness influenced by lower face vertical proportions and mandibular prominence. Orthod Waves. 2013;72(1):30–5.","12. Mahajan AY, Shafiei M, Marcus BC. Analysis of patient-determined preoperative computer imaging. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):290–5.","13. Loveday OE, Hakeem FB, Lekara DT, Harcourt P. A Software Tool for Facial Analysis. J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4(6):551–6.","14. Abdelkader M, Leong S, White PS. Aesthetic proportions of the nasal aperture in 3 different racial groups of men. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):111–3.","15. Green RD, Macdorman KF, Ho C-C, Vasudevan S. Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. 2008 [cited 2018 Dec 16]; Available from: www.sciencedirect.com","16. Zimbler M, Ham J. Aesthetic facial analysis. In: CUMMINGS OTOLARYNGOLOGY–HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. Fifth Edit. Philadelphia; 2010. p. 269–80.","17. Prokopakis EP, Vlastos IM, Picavet V, Nolst G, Thomas R, Cingi C, et al. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Int Rhinol Soc. 2013;51(4):18–22.","18. Naini FB, Moss JP, Gill DS. The enigma of facial beauty: Esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(3):277–82.","19. Cedeño JB. La Cara , sus Proporciones Estéticas. :1–11.","20. Fan J, Chau KP, Wan X, Zhai L, Lau E. Prediction of facial attractiveness from facial proportions. Pattern Recognit [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Dec 16];45:2326–34. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/pr","21. Vegter F, Hage JJ, Ph D. Clinical Anthropometry and Canons of the Face in Historical Perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1090–6.","22. Zacharopoulos GV, Manios A, De Bree E, Kau CH, Petousis M, Zacharopoulou I, et al. Neoclassical facial canons in young adults. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1693–8.","23. Zimbler M. Aesthetic facial analysis. Fifth Edit. … Otolaryngology Head & …. Copyright © 2010, 2005, 1998, 1993, 1986 by Mosby, Inc. All Rights Reserved; 2005.","24. Leong PL. Aging Changes in the Male Face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008;16(3):277–9.","25. Poore SO, Shama L, Marcus B. Facial Resur facing of the Male Patient. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008;16:357–69.","26. Lam SM. A new paradigm for the aging face. Textb Aging Ski [Internet]. 2010;18(1):1139–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.11.001","27. Murillo M. Análisis de la Variabilidad Morfológica facial en una Muestra de Personas con Ancestros Cundiboyacenses. 2010;1–103.","28. Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Oguz Ö. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(3):212–9.","29. Broer PN, Buonocore S, Morillas A, Liu J, Tanna N, Walker M, et al. Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):843e–850e.","30. Kyle S. Choe, Anthony P. Sclafani, Jason A. Litner, Guo-Pei Yu TRI. The Korean American Woman’s Face. Anthropometric Measurements and Quantitative Analysis of Facial Aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:244–52.","31. Naini FB. The Frankfort plane and head positioning in facial aesthetic analysis-The perpetuation of a myth. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):333–4.","32. Mirta H. Reksodiputro, Trimartani Koento, Boedhihartono APS. Facial anthropometric analysis of the Javanese Female. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):347–9.","33. Purkait R, Singh P. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: A study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(4):372–9.","34. Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, Gupta SC. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: A three-dimensional analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg [Internet]. 2010;63(12):2032–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.12.015","35. Vezzetti E, Calignano F, Moos S. Computer-aided morphological analysis for maxillo-facial diagnostic: a preliminary study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg [Internet]. 2010;63(2):218–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.09.031","36. Kühnel T, Wolf S. Mirror system for photodocumentation in plastic and aesthetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(6):830–2.","37. Lee S. Three-dimensional photography and its application to facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(6):410–4.","38. Henderson JL, Larrabee WF, Krieger BD. Photographic Standards for Facial Plastic Surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2015;7:331–3.","39. Riml S, Piontke a, Larcher L, Kompatscher P. Quantification of faults resulting from disregard of standardised facial photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jul;64(7):898–901.","40. Packiriswamy V, Kumar P, Bashour M. Photogrammetric analysis of eyebrow and upper eyelid dimensions in South Indians and Malaysian South Indians. Aesthetic Surg J. 2013;33(7):975–82.","41. Choi JY, Park JH, Javidnia H, Sykes JM. Effect of Various Facial Angles and Measurements on the Ideal Position of the Nasal Tip in the Asian Patient Population. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;","42. Ozdemir ST, Sigirli D, Ercan I, Cankur NS. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of Healthy Turkish young adults: Anthropometric measurements. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(2):175–84.","43. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(6):692–8.","44. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(1):64–9.","45. Farkas L, Katic M, Forrest C. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(4):615–46.","instname:Universidad del Rosario","reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparación de las medidas y proporciones faciales con cánones neoclásicos, en estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Posada Alvarez, Mary Eugenia","Corredor Zuluaga, Diego Andrés","Buitrago Medina, Daniel Alejandro"],"dc:date":["2019-01-16","2019-01-21T17:53:58Z"],"dc:description":["Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de un grupo de 287 estudiantes (hombres y mujeres) de la Universidad del Rosario, con edades entre los 18 y 30 años. Se tomaron fotografías frontal, lateral izquierdo, derecho y de la base nasal con un método estandarizado, con el fin de describir las proporciones faciales perfilométricas en contraste con los cánones neoclásicos. Se tomaron como referencia puntos perfilométricos anatómicos faciales que permitieron comparar las medidas con los derivados de las proporciones faciales ideales. Las medidas se realizaron con el Software “Golden Ratio”. Resultados: Se obtuvo al tercio facial inferior como el de mayor tamaño tanto en la vista frontal como en las laterales, siendo esta característica una constante en hombres y mujeres, también se encontró que los hombres presentan caras de mayor longitud con respecto a las mujeres. La longitud de la oreja es superior a la longitud nasal tanto en hombres como en mujeres; la distancia intercantal es mayor al ancho de la base nasal con una razón aproximada de 1.2cm. Con respecto a los ángulos, se encontrò gran variabilidad con respecto a los estandarizado en el triàngulo de Powell, y en la parte auricular, un ángulo de protrusión auricular mayor al valor estándar. Conclusión: Estos resultados nos permiten facilitar los análisis perfilométricos prequirúrgicos en especialidades afines a la otorrinolaringología y cirugía plástica facial en la población Colombiana, aportando además rangos de medidas propias o autóctonas al análisis forense y ciencias relacionadas.","Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of a group of 287 students (men and women) of the Universidad del Rosario, aged between 18 and 30 years. Frontal, left lateral, right and nasal base photographs were taken with a standardized method, in order to describe the profileometric proportions in contrast to the neoclassical canons. Facial anatomic profileometric points were taken as a reference that allowed to compare the measurements with those derived from the ideal facial proportions. The measurements were made with the Golden Ratio Software. Results: The lower facial third was obtained as the largest size in both the frontal and lateral views, this characteristic being a constant in men and women, it was also found that men have longer faces with respect to women. The length of the ear is greater than the nasal length in both men and women; the intercanthal distance is greater than the width of the nasal base with an approximate ratio of 1. 2cm. With respect to the angles, great variability was found with respect to the standardized ones in the Powell triangle, and in the atrial part, an angle of atrial protrusion greater than the standard value. Conclusion: These results allow us to facilitate pre-surgical pprofileometric analysis in specialties related to otorhinolaryngology and facial plastic surgery in the Colombian population, also providing ranges of own or autochthonous measures to forensic analysis and related sciences.","2021-01-22 01:01:02: Script de automatizacion de embargos. info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-01-21","lunes 21/01/2019 2:10 p. m. Hemos realizado la publicación de su documento, el cual puede consultar en el siguiente enlace: http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896Usted escogió la opción “Bloqueado (Texto referencial)”, por lo que el documento ha quedado con acceso bloqueado temporalmente hasta el 21 de enero de 2021 en concordancia con las Políticas de Acceso Abierto de la Universidad. Si usted desea al finalizar este tiempo puede volver a solicitar el embargo por otro nuevo periodo.Tenga en cuenta que los documentos en acceso abierto propician una mayor visibilidad de su producción académica."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18896","http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18896"],"dc:language":["spa"],"dc:publisher":["Universidad del Rosario","Facultad de medicina","Especialización en Otorrinolaringología"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/"],"dc:source":["1. Dayan S. What is beauty, and why do we care so much about it? Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;1(13):66–7.","2. Dhir K. Zonal Analysis of Facial Asymmetry and Its Clinical Significance in Facial Plastic Surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;15(2):110.","3. Fang F, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):874–81.","4. Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina-Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J, et al. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman’s face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Nov;63(11):1825–31.","5. Bashour M. History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3):741–56.","6. Meneghini F. Clinical Facial Analysis. Heidelberg GS, editor. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005.","7. Naini F. Leonardo da Vinci’s Aesthetic Analysis of Nasal Tip Prominence. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(6):463–4.","8. Navarro C, Villanueva J. Proporciones del equilibrio facial. El acondicionamiento seguro y sencillo de supraestructuras de implante. Quitessence técnica. 2011;22(2):1–95.","9. Johnston VS, Solomon CJ, Gibson SJ, Pallares-bejarano A. Human . Current theories and MethodologiesFacial Beauty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2013;5:371–7.","10. Biller JA, Kim DW. A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):91–7.","11. Gautam G, Shashikalakumari V, Garg G. Facial attractiveness influenced by lower face vertical proportions and mandibular prominence. Orthod Waves. 2013;72(1):30–5.","12. Mahajan AY, Shafiei M, Marcus BC. Analysis of patient-determined preoperative computer imaging. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):290–5.","13. Loveday OE, Hakeem FB, Lekara DT, Harcourt P. A Software Tool for Facial Analysis. J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4(6):551–6.","14. Abdelkader M, Leong S, White PS. Aesthetic proportions of the nasal aperture in 3 different racial groups of men. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):111–3.","15. Green RD, Macdorman KF, Ho C-C, Vasudevan S. Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. 2008 [cited 2018 Dec 16]; Available from: www.sciencedirect.com","16. Zimbler M, Ham J. Aesthetic facial analysis. In: CUMMINGS OTOLARYNGOLOGY–HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. Fifth Edit. Philadelphia; 2010. p. 269–80.","17. Prokopakis EP, Vlastos IM, Picavet V, Nolst G, Thomas R, Cingi C, et al. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Int Rhinol Soc. 2013;51(4):18–22.","18. Naini FB, Moss JP, Gill DS. The enigma of facial beauty: Esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(3):277–82.","19. Cedeño JB. La Cara , sus Proporciones Estéticas. :1–11.","20. Fan J, Chau KP, Wan X, Zhai L, Lau E. Prediction of facial attractiveness from facial proportions. Pattern Recognit [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Dec 16];45:2326–34. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/pr","21. Vegter F, Hage JJ, Ph D. Clinical Anthropometry and Canons of the Face in Historical Perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1090–6.","22. Zacharopoulos GV, Manios A, De Bree E, Kau CH, Petousis M, Zacharopoulou I, et al. Neoclassical facial canons in young adults. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1693–8.","23. Zimbler M. Aesthetic facial analysis. Fifth Edit. … Otolaryngology Head & …. Copyright © 2010, 2005, 1998, 1993, 1986 by Mosby, Inc. All Rights Reserved; 2005.","24. Leong PL. Aging Changes in the Male Face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008;16(3):277–9.","25. Poore SO, Shama L, Marcus B. Facial Resur facing of the Male Patient. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008;16:357–69.","26. Lam SM. A new paradigm for the aging face. Textb Aging Ski [Internet]. 2010;18(1):1139–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.11.001","27. Murillo M. Análisis de la Variabilidad Morfológica facial en una Muestra de Personas con Ancestros Cundiboyacenses. 2010;1–103.","28. Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Oguz Ö. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(3):212–9.","29. Broer PN, Buonocore S, Morillas A, Liu J, Tanna N, Walker M, et al. Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):843e–850e.","30. Kyle S. Choe, Anthony P. Sclafani, Jason A. Litner, Guo-Pei Yu TRI. The Korean American Woman’s Face. Anthropometric Measurements and Quantitative Analysis of Facial Aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:244–52.","31. Naini FB. The Frankfort plane and head positioning in facial aesthetic analysis-The perpetuation of a myth. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):333–4.","32. Mirta H. Reksodiputro, Trimartani Koento, Boedhihartono APS. Facial anthropometric analysis of the Javanese Female. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(5):347–9.","33. Purkait R, Singh P. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: A study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(4):372–9.","34. Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, Gupta SC. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: A three-dimensional analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg [Internet]. 2010;63(12):2032–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.12.015","35. Vezzetti E, Calignano F, Moos S. Computer-aided morphological analysis for maxillo-facial diagnostic: a preliminary study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg [Internet]. 2010;63(2):218–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.09.031","36. Kühnel T, Wolf S. Mirror system for photodocumentation in plastic and aesthetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(6):830–2.","37. Lee S. Three-dimensional photography and its application to facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(6):410–4.","38. Henderson JL, Larrabee WF, Krieger BD. Photographic Standards for Facial Plastic Surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2015;7:331–3.","39. Riml S, Piontke a, Larcher L, Kompatscher P. Quantification of faults resulting from disregard of standardised facial photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jul;64(7):898–901.","40. Packiriswamy V, Kumar P, Bashour M. Photogrammetric analysis of eyebrow and upper eyelid dimensions in South Indians and Malaysian South Indians. Aesthetic Surg J. 2013;33(7):975–82.","41. Choi JY, Park JH, Javidnia H, Sykes JM. Effect of Various Facial Angles and Measurements on the Ideal Position of the Nasal Tip in the Asian Patient Population. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;","42. Ozdemir ST, Sigirli D, Ercan I, Cankur NS. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of Healthy Turkish young adults: Anthropometric measurements. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(2):175–84.","43. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(6):692–8.","44. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(1):64–9.","45. Farkas L, Katic M, Forrest C. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(4):615–46.","instname:Universidad del Rosario","reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR"],"dc:subject":["Estético","Asimetría facial","Cosmética","Cirugía plástica","Antropometría","Belleza","Antropología física","Esthetics","Facial asymmetry","Cosmetics","Surgery","Plastic","Anthropometry","Beauty","Fisonomía","Cara"],"dc:title":["Comparación de las medidas y proporciones faciales con cánones neoclásicos, en estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:46:59Z"}