Back to results

Rockefeller

Paying the Penalty: The Role of Punishment in Theories of Justified Civil Disobedience

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>The problem of civil disobedience and its justification has received a great deal of attention in the past decade, and it seems safe to say that a consensus of sorts has been reached with respect to the basic questions of (i) whether such dissent can be morally justified in a legitimate constitutional democracy; and, if it can be justified, (ii) roughly what the conditions are under which this is the case. The received view among liberal political theorists, as I understand it, is that civil disobedience can be morally justified, under certain conditions, even in a more or less just democratic society. What's more, there is a remarkable degree of agreement among contemporary thinkers as to roughly what the conditions are under which civil disobedience is justified.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Year
1974

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Farrell, Daniel Michael
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Joel Feinberg

Subjects

dc:subject × 7

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu:student_theses_and_dissertations-1503

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Rockefeller
Base URL
digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Farrell, Daniel Michael. Paying the Penalty: The Role of Punishment in Theories of Justified Civil Disobedience. Thesis thesis, 1974. https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/student_theses_and_dissertations/495