{"id":{"repo_id":"regina","oai_identifier":"oai:uregina.scholaris.ca:10294/16823"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/regina/oai:uregina.scholaris.ca:10294/16823","repository":{"repo_id":"regina","name":"University of Regina","base_url":"https://uregina.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Exploring professors’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education","abstract":"The invention and widespread adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has begun to disrupt the field of education, as leading scholars debate its potential to enhance or hinder learning. GenAI models such as ChatGPT demonstrate remarkable capabilities, evidenced by its success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam and Uniform Bar Exam, for example. With over one billion current users and more than one million users within five days of launching, ChatGPT remains one of the most rapidly adopted consumer applications. ChatGPT’s ability to amass users at a significantly greater rate than other popular platforms such as Facebook and Instagram exemplify its widespread adoption, with some of its users inevitably being students. Many authors claim that GenAI can augment the learning process by acting as a personalized tutor or improving the quality of students’ work. However, certain authors support the notion that GenAI may undermine the learning process and pose risks to academic integrity. By using semi-structured interviews, this study seeks to investigate university professors’ perspectives on GenAI and the implications for policymakers. Specifically, this study focused on perceptions of GenAI use and academic misconduct, and the underlying assumptions professor’s hold regarding whether GenAI undermines or augments the learning process.","abstract_html":"The invention and widespread adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has begun to disrupt the field of education, as leading scholars debate its potential to enhance or hinder learning. GenAI models such as ChatGPT demonstrate remarkable capabilities, evidenced by its success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam and Uniform Bar Exam, for example. With over one billion current users and more than one million users within five days of launching, ChatGPT remains one of the most rapidly adopted consumer applications. ChatGPT’s ability to amass users at a significantly greater rate than other popular platforms such as Facebook and Instagram exemplify its widespread adoption, with some of its users inevitably being students. Many authors claim that GenAI can augment the learning process by acting as a personalized tutor or improving the quality of students’ work. However, certain authors support the notion that GenAI may undermine the learning process and pose risks to academic integrity. By using semi-structured interviews, this study seeks to investigate university professors’ perspectives on GenAI and the implications for policymakers. Specifically, this study focused on perceptions of GenAI use and academic misconduct, and the underlying assumptions professor’s hold regarding whether GenAI undermines or augments the learning process.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Matthews, Avery Thomas"],"institution":"Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina","degree_name":"Master of Education (MEd)","degree_level":"Master's","degree_discipline":"Education Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Thompson, S. Anthony"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Lugt, Jenn de","Couros, Alec"],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-02","date_published":"2025-02","updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:03:27Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.82465/3820"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.82465/3820","href":"https://doi.org/10.82465/3820","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10294/16823","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Thompson, S. Anthony"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Lugt, Jenn de","Couros, Alec"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Matthews, Avery Thomas"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-07-11T16:28:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-07-11T16:28:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-02"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["master thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master's"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Education (MEd)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Regina"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.82465/3820"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10294/16823"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in Educational Psychology, University of Regina. vi, 102 p."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The invention and widespread adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has begun to disrupt the field of education, as leading scholars debate its potential to enhance or hinder learning. GenAI models such as ChatGPT demonstrate remarkable capabilities, evidenced by its success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam and Uniform Bar Exam, for example. With over one billion current users and more than one million users within five days of launching, ChatGPT remains one of the most rapidly adopted consumer applications. ChatGPT’s ability to amass users at a significantly greater rate than other popular platforms such as Facebook and Instagram exemplify its widespread adoption, with some of its users inevitably being students. Many authors claim that GenAI can augment the learning process by acting as a personalized tutor or improving the quality of students’ work. However, certain authors support the notion that GenAI may undermine the learning process and pose risks to academic integrity. By using semi-structured interviews, this study seeks to investigate university professors’ perspectives on GenAI and the implications for policymakers. Specifically, this study focused on perceptions of GenAI use and academic misconduct, and the underlying assumptions professor’s hold regarding whether GenAI undermines or augments the learning process."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Exploring professors’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Thompson, S. Anthony"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Lugt, Jenn de","Couros, Alec"],"dc:creator":["Matthews, Avery Thomas"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-07-11T16:28:09Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-07-11T16:28:09Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-02"],"dc:description":["A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in Educational Psychology, University of Regina. vi, 102 p."],"dc:description.abstract":["The invention and widespread adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has begun to disrupt the field of education, as leading scholars debate its potential to enhance or hinder learning. GenAI models such as ChatGPT demonstrate remarkable capabilities, evidenced by its success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam and Uniform Bar Exam, for example. With over one billion current users and more than one million users within five days of launching, ChatGPT remains one of the most rapidly adopted consumer applications. ChatGPT’s ability to amass users at a significantly greater rate than other popular platforms such as Facebook and Instagram exemplify its widespread adoption, with some of its users inevitably being students. Many authors claim that GenAI can augment the learning process by acting as a personalized tutor or improving the quality of students’ work. However, certain authors support the notion that GenAI may undermine the learning process and pose risks to academic integrity. By using semi-structured interviews, this study seeks to investigate university professors’ perspectives on GenAI and the implications for policymakers. Specifically, this study focused on perceptions of GenAI use and academic misconduct, and the underlying assumptions professor’s hold regarding whether GenAI undermines or augments the learning process."],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.82465/3820"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10294/16823"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina"],"dc:title":["Exploring professors’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education"],"dc:type":["master thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master's"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Education (MEd)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Regina"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T04:03:27Z"}