Back to results

Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina

Restorative Justice, Apology, Restitution, and Forgiveness

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Operating from a retributive approach, the current criminal justice system (CJS) often does not appear to value the well-being of victims. As an alternative approach, restorative justice values the well-being of victims and provides opportunities that can foster forgiveness compared to a retributive approach. London (2011) has linked the importance of forgiveness to the emotional and psychological well-being of victims. Using London’s (2006; 2011), this research aims to provide insight into what factors affect an individual’s willingness to forgive an offender. In doing so, this may improve and expand on how the Canadian CJS is able to serve the needs of victims and improve their well-being. University of Regina students were surveyed regarding factors that may increase their willingness to forgive an offender following two separate hypothetical crime scenarios. Data were collected on the demographics, participants’ support for either a retributive or restorative paradigm, and whether participants were victim- or offender-focused. The demographic variables of ethnicity, gender, and religiousness did not indicate any positive relationships with participants’ willingness to forgive. When analyzing paradigmatic support, participants indicated uncertainty as they supported both restorative and retributive values. However, no relationship was identified between restorative- and retributive-focused and participants’ willingness to forgive. Victim- or offender-focused also showed no relationship with participants’ willingness to forgive. In conclusion, a lack of factors associated with a victim’s willingness to forgive were identified, suggesting that future research is needed to better understand what increases a victim’s willingness to forgive an offender. An unanticipated outcome was the lack of definitiveness regarding restorative and retributive perspectives on the CJS. This may suggest the beginning of a paradigmatic shift – from retributive to restorative – in how individuals approach justice, but warrants further research. Restorative justice is not a new approach, but the results of this study indicated that the ideologies and elements that support restorative justice may be becoming more mainstream.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Arts (MA)
Level thesis:degree_level
Master's
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Justice Studies
Grantor dc:publisher
Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina
Year dc:date.issued
2021

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Holmes, Amber Rae
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Jones, Nicholas
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Asadullah, Muhammad
  • Keown, Leslie-Anne

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:uregina.scholaris.ca:10294/14989

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Regina
Base URL
uregina.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Holmes, Amber Rae. Restorative Justice, Apology, Restitution, and Forgiveness. Master's thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina, 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/10294/14989