Back to results

Queen's University Belfast

Mini-Publics and the Maxi-Public: Investigating the Perceived Legitimacy of Citizens’ Assemblies in a Deeply Divided Place

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Across the world, democratic deficits arise from a growing gap between citizens’ expectations and the way they perceive political systems to operate in practice. Deliberative theory offers a potential solution by advocating the direct involvement of ordinary citizens in structured decision-making. This approach has been increasingly applied to real-world decision-making through mini-public initiatives. This thesis investigates the largely neglected relationship between citizens’ assemblies, as one established form of mini-public, and their perceived legitimacy from the perspective of the maxi-public. Compared to other modes of decision-making, to what extent do people regard citizens’ assemblies as legitimate? And are there design features of citizens’ assemblies that strengthen or weaken perceptions of their legitimacy?<br/><br/> These questions are applied to the deeply divided case of Northern Ireland, where it can be particularly challenging to design democratic institutions that command popular legitimacy. Cross-sectional survey data reveal largely favourable attitudes towards citizens’ assemblies, especially compared to some more familiar modes of decision-making. The results of a series of complementary online experiments find that specific design features of citizens’ assemblies have no direct effect on perceived legitimacy. However, there is some variation at the individual level, suggesting that the design features of a citizens’ assembly should reflect its purpose and the broader context. Overall, the findings suggest that the establishment of citizens’ assemblies alongside existing institutions can make a positive contribution to the democratic performance of a political system, even in a deeply divided place.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral Thesis
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Queen's University Belfast
Year dc:date.issued
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Pow, James Timothy
Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
  • Garry, John
  • Turner, Rhiannon

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/298978ae-19fb-4a48-86e8-db986b8bb39a
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/298978ae-19fb-4a48-86e8-db986b8bb39a

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Queen's University Belfast
Base URL
pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/oai
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Pow, James Timothy. Mini-Publics and the Maxi-Public: Investigating the Perceived Legitimacy of Citizens’ Assemblies in a Deeply Divided Place. Doctoral Thesis thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2019. https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/298978ae-19fb-4a48-86e8-db986b8bb39a