{"id":{"repo_id":"qu-belfast","oai_identifier":"oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/qu-belfast/oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b","repository":{"repo_id":"qu-belfast","name":"Queen's University Belfast","base_url":"https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/oai"},"display":{"title":"Risk transfer in operational public private partnerships in the education sector","abstract":"Despite risk transfer being deemed a key driver in attaining value for money in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), plus the substantial resources already committed to PPPs globally, prior studies have tended to focus on PPP procurement, projects in their early stages or on the accounting treatment of PPPs, with limited research being conducted on risk transfer in operational PPPs. There is also a dearth of comparative investigations into risk allocation in PPP and traditionally procured (TP) projects. <br/><br/>Drawing on Principal Agent Theory, Lonsdale’s modified Transaction Cost Economics framework, relational contracting and the relational theory of risk this research sought to address this gap by examining whether risks have been transferred as intended. Planned levels of risk allocation were identified by analysing the procurement documents for a sample of operational PPP and TP schools in NI and ROI. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key public and private sector stakeholders to capture their experiences and perceptions of risk allocation at the operational stage of PPP and TP school projects. <br/><br/>As anticipated, risks largely remained with the public sector for the TP schools examined. However, as interviewees’ responses regarding risk allocation in PPP schools differed somewhat from the analysis of the procurement documentation and the findings from prior studies, the results of this research challenge the technicist view of risk which contends that it can be transferred and priced. Variation between expected versus actual risk allocation appears to be as a consequence of contract subjectivity and flexibility, which is associated with relational contracting, together with disparities in contract knowledge, one of Lonsdale’s factors. Examples of good practice, recommendations for policy makers and suggested areas for future research were also identified.","abstract_html":"Despite risk transfer being deemed a key driver in attaining value for money in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), plus the substantial resources already committed to PPPs globally, prior studies have tended to focus on PPP procurement, projects in their early stages or on the accounting treatment of PPPs, with limited research being conducted on risk transfer in operational PPPs. There is also a dearth of comparative investigations into risk allocation in PPP and traditionally procured (TP) projects. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Drawing on Principal Agent Theory, Lonsdale’s modified Transaction Cost Economics framework, relational contracting and the relational theory of risk this research sought to address this gap by examining whether risks have been transferred as intended. Planned levels of risk allocation were identified by analysing the procurement documents for a sample of operational PPP and TP schools in NI and ROI. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key public and private sector stakeholders to capture their experiences and perceptions of risk allocation at the operational stage of PPP and TP school projects. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As anticipated, risks largely remained with the public sector for the TP schools examined. However, as interviewees’ responses regarding risk allocation in PPP schools differed somewhat from the analysis of the procurement documentation and the findings from prior studies, the results of this research challenge the technicist view of risk which contends that it can be transferred and priced. Variation between expected versus actual risk allocation appears to be as a consequence of contract subjectivity and flexibility, which is associated with relational contracting, together with disparities in contract knowledge, one of Lonsdale’s factors. Examples of good practice, recommendations for policy makers and suggested areas for future research were also identified.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Flynn, Caroline"],"institution":"Queen's University Belfast","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-12","date_published":"2020-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:55:25Z","subjects":["Public Private Partnership (PPP)","Private Finance Initiative (PFI)","Traditionally Procured (TP)","operational","risk allocation","risk transfer","Transaction Cost Economics (TCE)","relational contracting","Education"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"],"render_values":[{"text":"oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["Technological University Dublin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Flynn, Caroline"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-12"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Queen's Business School"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["Queen's University Belfast"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Public Private Partnership (PPP)","Private Finance Initiative (PFI)","Traditionally Procured (TP)","operational","risk allocation","risk transfer","Transaction Cost Economics (TCE)","relational contracting","Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b","https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://pure.qub.ac.uk/files/219260294/Risk_Transfer_in_Operational_Public_Private_Partnerships_in_the_Education_Sector.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Despite risk transfer being deemed a key driver in attaining value for money in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), plus the substantial resources already committed to PPPs globally, prior studies have tended to focus on PPP procurement, projects in their early stages or on the accounting treatment of PPPs, with limited research being conducted on risk transfer in operational PPPs. There is also a dearth of comparative investigations into risk allocation in PPP and traditionally procured (TP) projects. <br/><br/>Drawing on Principal Agent Theory, Lonsdale’s modified Transaction Cost Economics framework, relational contracting and the relational theory of risk this research sought to address this gap by examining whether risks have been transferred as intended. Planned levels of risk allocation were identified by analysing the procurement documents for a sample of operational PPP and TP schools in NI and ROI. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key public and private sector stakeholders to capture their experiences and perceptions of risk allocation at the operational stage of PPP and TP school projects. <br/><br/>As anticipated, risks largely remained with the public sector for the TP schools examined. However, as interviewees’ responses regarding risk allocation in PPP schools differed somewhat from the analysis of the procurement documentation and the findings from prior studies, the results of this research challenge the technicist view of risk which contends that it can be transferred and priced. Variation between expected versus actual risk allocation appears to be as a consequence of contract subjectivity and flexibility, which is associated with relational contracting, together with disparities in contract knowledge, one of Lonsdale’s factors. Examples of good practice, recommendations for policy makers and suggested areas for future research were also identified."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Risk transfer in operational public private partnerships in the education sector"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["Technological University Dublin"],"dc:creator":["Flynn, Caroline"],"dc:date":["2020-12"],"dc:date.issued":["2020-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["Despite risk transfer being deemed a key driver in attaining value for money in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), plus the substantial resources already committed to PPPs globally, prior studies have tended to focus on PPP procurement, projects in their early stages or on the accounting treatment of PPPs, with limited research being conducted on risk transfer in operational PPPs. There is also a dearth of comparative investigations into risk allocation in PPP and traditionally procured (TP) projects. <br/><br/>Drawing on Principal Agent Theory, Lonsdale’s modified Transaction Cost Economics framework, relational contracting and the relational theory of risk this research sought to address this gap by examining whether risks have been transferred as intended. Planned levels of risk allocation were identified by analysing the procurement documents for a sample of operational PPP and TP schools in NI and ROI. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key public and private sector stakeholders to capture their experiences and perceptions of risk allocation at the operational stage of PPP and TP school projects. <br/><br/>As anticipated, risks largely remained with the public sector for the TP schools examined. However, as interviewees’ responses regarding risk allocation in PPP schools differed somewhat from the analysis of the procurement documentation and the findings from prior studies, the results of this research challenge the technicist view of risk which contends that it can be transferred and priced. Variation between expected versus actual risk allocation appears to be as a consequence of contract subjectivity and flexibility, which is associated with relational contracting, together with disparities in contract knowledge, one of Lonsdale’s factors. Examples of good practice, recommendations for policy makers and suggested areas for future research were also identified."],"dc:identifier":["oai:pure.qub.ac.uk/portal:studenttheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b","https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://pure.qub.ac.uk/files/219260294/Risk_Transfer_in_Operational_Public_Private_Partnerships_in_the_Education_Sector.pdf"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Queen's Business School"],"dc:publisher.institution":["Queen's University Belfast"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/11012e32-f254-4020-8f39-bf43f9f64e2b"],"dc:subject":["Public Private Partnership (PPP)","Private Finance Initiative (PFI)","Traditionally Procured (TP)","operational","risk allocation","risk transfer","Transaction Cost Economics (TCE)","relational contracting","Education"],"dc:title":["Risk transfer in operational public private partnerships in the education sector"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:55:25Z"}