{"id":{"repo_id":"purdue-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:open_access_dissertations-2713"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/purdue-thes/oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:open_access_dissertations-2713","repository":{"repo_id":"purdue-thes","name":"Purdue University","base_url":"https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Comparison of Item Parameters across Item Types","abstract":"Seven item formats from a professional licensure examination program (n=4,706) were evaluated to determine whether there are significant differences in item parameter estimates based on item formats. The item formats were standard multiple choice, multiple choice with a graphic or exhibit attached, multiple choice where the examinee was asked to choose the best of four possible correct solutions, multiple choice where examinees were directed to choose the exception, calculations, ordered response and multiple response. Analysis showed similar item parameters for all multiple-choice type items, but better item fit and significantly longer response times for calculation items. Multiple response items were found to produce similar item parameters as multiple-choice items with the exception of increased item difficulty, which is likely due to dichotomous scoring. Ordered response items tended to have longer response times, and are generally more difficult than multiple-choice items. Calculation items were found to be the most discriminating, while ordered response items were the least discriminating.","abstract_html":"Seven item formats from a professional licensure examination program (n=4,706) were evaluated to determine whether there are significant differences in item parameter estimates based on item formats. The item formats were standard multiple choice, multiple choice with a graphic or exhibit attached, multiple choice where the examinee was asked to choose the best of four possible correct solutions, multiple choice where examinees were directed to choose the exception, calculations, ordered response and multiple response. Analysis showed similar item parameters for all multiple-choice type items, but better item fit and significantly longer response times for calculation items. Multiple response items were found to produce similar item parameters as multiple-choice items with the exception of increased item difficulty, which is likely due to dichotomous scoring. Ordered response items tended to have longer response times, and are generally more difficult than multiple-choice items. Calculation items were found to be the most discriminating, while ordered response items were the least discriminating.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Applegate, Gregory M."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Deborah Bennett","Jerry L Gorham","April Ginther","Ala Samarapungavan"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:54:44Z","subjects":["item format","item parameters","Rasch"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1497","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Deborah Bennett","Jerry L Gorham","April Ginther","Ala Samarapungavan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Applegate, Gregory M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["item format","item parameters","Rasch"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1497"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Seven item formats from a professional licensure examination program (n=4,706) were evaluated to determine whether there are significant differences in item parameter estimates based on item formats. The item formats were standard multiple choice, multiple choice with a graphic or exhibit attached, multiple choice where the examinee was asked to choose the best of four possible correct solutions, multiple choice where examinees were directed to choose the exception, calculations, ordered response and multiple response. Analysis showed similar item parameters for all multiple-choice type items, but better item fit and significantly longer response times for calculation items. Multiple response items were found to produce similar item parameters as multiple-choice items with the exception of increased item difficulty, which is likely due to dichotomous scoring. Ordered response items tended to have longer response times, and are generally more difficult than multiple-choice items. Calculation items were found to be the most discriminating, while ordered response items were the least discriminating."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Comparison of Item Parameters across Item Types"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Deborah Bennett","Jerry L Gorham","April Ginther","Ala Samarapungavan"],"dc:creator":["Applegate, Gregory M."],"dc:description.abstract":["Seven item formats from a professional licensure examination program (n=4,706) were evaluated to determine whether there are significant differences in item parameter estimates based on item formats. The item formats were standard multiple choice, multiple choice with a graphic or exhibit attached, multiple choice where the examinee was asked to choose the best of four possible correct solutions, multiple choice where examinees were directed to choose the exception, calculations, ordered response and multiple response. Analysis showed similar item parameters for all multiple-choice type items, but better item fit and significantly longer response times for calculation items. Multiple response items were found to produce similar item parameters as multiple-choice items with the exception of increased item difficulty, which is likely due to dichotomous scoring. Ordered response items tended to have longer response times, and are generally more difficult than multiple-choice items. Calculation items were found to be the most discriminating, while ordered response items were the least discriminating."],"dc:identifier":["https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1497"],"dc:subject":["item format","item parameters","Rasch"],"dc:title":["A Comparison of Item Parameters across Item Types"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:54:44Z"}