{"id":{"repo_id":"purdue-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:open_access_dissertations-2269"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/purdue-thes/oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:open_access_dissertations-2269","repository":{"repo_id":"purdue-thes","name":"Purdue University","base_url":"https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Dynamic analysis of dynamic cone penetration test for subgrade compaction assessment","abstract":"<p>In practice, soil compaction quality assessment relies on the determination of the in-place compacted dry unit weight, which is then compared with the maximum dry unit weight obtained from a laboratory compaction test. Most DOTs typically require that the in-place dry unit weight for compacted soil be over 95% of the laboratory maximum dry unit weight obtained from Standard Proctor compaction test results. Nuclear gauges may be used to determine the in-place dry unit weight, however, they are potentially hazardous and require safety precautions. Other tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT), can be used for soil compaction quality assessment.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In practice, soil compaction quality assessment relies on the determination of the in-place compacted dry unit weight, which is then compared with the maximum dry unit weight obtained from a laboratory compaction test. Most DOTs typically require that the in-place dry unit weight for compacted soil be over 95% of the laboratory maximum dry unit weight obtained from Standard Proctor compaction test results. Nuclear gauges may be used to determine the in-place dry unit weight, however, they are potentially hazardous and require safety precautions. Other tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT), can be used for soil compaction quality assessment.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kim, Hobi"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Civil Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Monica Prezzi","Rodrigo Salgado","Ayhan Irfanoglu","Arun Prakash"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2014-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:54:17Z","subjects":["dynamic analysis","dynamic cone penetration test","quality control","soil compaction","unsaturated soil"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1053","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Monica Prezzi","Rodrigo Salgado","Ayhan Irfanoglu","Arun Prakash"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kim, Hobi"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["dynamic analysis","dynamic cone penetration test","quality control","soil compaction","unsaturated soil"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1053"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In practice, soil compaction quality assessment relies on the determination of the in-place compacted dry unit weight, which is then compared with the maximum dry unit weight obtained from a laboratory compaction test. Most DOTs typically require that the in-place dry unit weight for compacted soil be over 95% of the laboratory maximum dry unit weight obtained from Standard Proctor compaction test results. Nuclear gauges may be used to determine the in-place dry unit weight, however, they are potentially hazardous and require safety precautions. Other tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT), can be used for soil compaction quality assessment.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Dynamic analysis of dynamic cone penetration test for subgrade compaction assessment"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Monica Prezzi","Rodrigo Salgado","Ayhan Irfanoglu","Arun Prakash"],"dc:creator":["Kim, Hobi"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In practice, soil compaction quality assessment relies on the determination of the in-place compacted dry unit weight, which is then compared with the maximum dry unit weight obtained from a laboratory compaction test. Most DOTs typically require that the in-place dry unit weight for compacted soil be over 95% of the laboratory maximum dry unit weight obtained from Standard Proctor compaction test results. Nuclear gauges may be used to determine the in-place dry unit weight, however, they are potentially hazardous and require safety precautions. Other tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT), can be used for soil compaction quality assessment.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1053"],"dc:subject":["dynamic analysis","dynamic cone penetration test","quality control","soil compaction","unsaturated soil"],"dc:title":["Dynamic analysis of dynamic cone penetration test for subgrade compaction assessment"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:54:17Z"}