Purdue University
A sociosemantic examination of secondary English teacher written feedback
Abstract
dc:description.abstract<p>The purpose of this study was to provide a functional linguistic based description of teacher writing comments in secondary ELA classrooms. Based within a case study methodology, this study used analytical tools from Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) in order to discover the various meanings that teachers make through their commenting practices. The findings of the study show that teacher comments focus on the content of the student writing, but also, significantly, help teachers to discursively realize various teacher identities. It was also found that teacher comments tended to either be concrete in their reference to a particular error in the text, or abstract in mentioning a particular theoretical understanding about writing, and comments rarely linked the concrete to the abstract. The implication of these findings suggest that teachers and students may benefit from a shared metalanguage that would allow them to explicitly link abstract notions of correctness in writing to particular, concrete places in the student text.</p>
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Curriculum & Instruction
- Year
- 2014
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Angus, Ryan
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Luciana C. de Oliveira
- Janet Alsup
- Tony Silva
- Ruth Harman
Subjects
dc:subject × 3Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/225
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:docs.lib.purdue.edu:open_access_dissertations-1235