{"id":{"repo_id":"potsdam-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:kobv.de-opus4-uni-potsdam:40618"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/potsdam-thes/oai:kobv.de-opus4-uni-potsdam:40618","repository":{"repo_id":"potsdam-thes","name":"Universität Potsdam - Thes","base_url":"https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/oai"},"display":{"title":"Institutional interplay in global environmental governance","abstract":"The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions’ treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.","abstract_html":"The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions’ treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Elsässer, Joshua Philipp"],"institution":"Universität Potsdam","degree_name":null,"degree_level":"master","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hickmann, Thomas","Fuhr, Harald"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-07","date_published":"2017-09-07","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:52:09Z","subjects":["Global Environmental Governance","institutional interplay","institutional complexity","international institutions","institutionelle Komplexität","internationale Institutionen"],"languages":[],"rights":["Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/40618","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"source_url"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hickmann, Thomas","Fuhr, Harald"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Elsässer, Joshua Philipp"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universität Potsdam"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["masterThesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["master"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Universität Potsdam"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Global Environmental Governance","institutional interplay","institutional complexity","international institutions","institutionelle Komplexität","internationale Institutionen"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions’ treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.","Die Rio-Konventionen stehen im Mittelpunkt internationaler Kooperation im Bezug auf den Governance-Bereich Klimawandel, Biodiversität und Desertifikation. Aufgrund von substantiellen ökologischen und politischen Verknüpfungen herrschen Wechselwirkungen zwischen den drei Regelungswerken. Die vorliegende Arbeit unternimmt den Versuch, die aus den institutionellen Interaktionen resultierende Relation zwischen der Klimarahmenkonvention der Vereinten Nationen, der Biodiversitätskonvention und dem Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen zur Bekämpfung der Wüstenbildung über einen Zeitraum von deren Entstehung 1992 bis heute zu analysieren und zu beurteilen. Diese Forschungsarbeit untersucht die interinstitutionellen Beziehungen zwischen den drei Konventionen und identifiziert dabei konfliktträchtige, kooperative und synergetische Aspekte. Während in einer empirische Analyse insgesamt nur schwache Indikatoren für einen konfliktträchtigen Beziehungstyp gefunden wurden, kann in der Gesamtbetrachtung konstatiert werden, dass die bisherigen interinstitutionellen Interaktionen zu einer kooperativen Beziehung zwischen den Rio-Konventionen geführt haben. Darüberhinaus weisen die zunehmende Koordinierung und Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Sekretariaten der Konventionen Charakteristika einer synergetischen Beziehung auf. Das intensive Zusammenwirken dieser Akteure könnte sich in der Zukunft als Gelegenheit herausstellen, institutionelles Management aktiver zu gestalten und voranzubringen. In einem Fazit spielt die Arbeit das Szenario der Entstehung einer allumfassenden Umweltorganisation durch, die sich als Folgewirkung aus der gemeinsamen Steuerung des institutionellen Komplexes Klimawandel, Biodiversität und Desertifikation entwickeln könnte."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Institutional interplay in global environmental governance","Institutionelles Zusammenspiel im Bereich Global Environmental Governance"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hickmann, Thomas","Fuhr, Harald"],"dc:creator":["Elsässer, Joshua Philipp"],"dc:description.abstract":["The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions’ treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.","Die Rio-Konventionen stehen im Mittelpunkt internationaler Kooperation im Bezug auf den Governance-Bereich Klimawandel, Biodiversität und Desertifikation. Aufgrund von substantiellen ökologischen und politischen Verknüpfungen herrschen Wechselwirkungen zwischen den drei Regelungswerken. Die vorliegende Arbeit unternimmt den Versuch, die aus den institutionellen Interaktionen resultierende Relation zwischen der Klimarahmenkonvention der Vereinten Nationen, der Biodiversitätskonvention und dem Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen zur Bekämpfung der Wüstenbildung über einen Zeitraum von deren Entstehung 1992 bis heute zu analysieren und zu beurteilen. Diese Forschungsarbeit untersucht die interinstitutionellen Beziehungen zwischen den drei Konventionen und identifiziert dabei konfliktträchtige, kooperative und synergetische Aspekte. Während in einer empirische Analyse insgesamt nur schwache Indikatoren für einen konfliktträchtigen Beziehungstyp gefunden wurden, kann in der Gesamtbetrachtung konstatiert werden, dass die bisherigen interinstitutionellen Interaktionen zu einer kooperativen Beziehung zwischen den Rio-Konventionen geführt haben. Darüberhinaus weisen die zunehmende Koordinierung und Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Sekretariaten der Konventionen Charakteristika einer synergetischen Beziehung auf. Das intensive Zusammenwirken dieser Akteure könnte sich in der Zukunft als Gelegenheit herausstellen, institutionelles Management aktiver zu gestalten und voranzubringen. In einem Fazit spielt die Arbeit das Szenario der Entstehung einer allumfassenden Umweltorganisation durch, die sich als Folgewirkung aus der gemeinsamen Steuerung des institutionellen Komplexes Klimawandel, Biodiversität und Desertifikation entwickeln könnte."],"dc:format.medium":["application/pdf"],"dc:publisher":["Universität Potsdam"],"dc:rights":["Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz"],"dc:subject":["Global Environmental Governance","institutional interplay","institutional complexity","international institutions","institutionelle Komplexität","internationale Institutionen"],"dc:title":["Institutional interplay in global environmental governance","Institutionelles Zusammenspiel im Bereich Global Environmental Governance"],"dc:type":["masterThesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["master"],"thesis:institution_name":["Universität Potsdam"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:52:09Z"}